An Analysis on Private School Teachers Being Scapegoated For Organizational Problems

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the views of private school teachers regarding the organizational problems they encounter. This research employs a phenomenological design, which is a qualitative research model. The participants of the study include 20 teachers working in private schools in Ankara in the year 2023. The selection of participants, determined on a voluntary basis, was carried out using the criterion and snowball sampling methods which are the purposive sampling techniques. Data for the research were collected through a semi-structured interview form. In line with the themes identified based on the relevant literature for the purpose of the study, the collected data were analyzed using content analysis method. According to the research findings, the organizational problems reported by teachers include job insecurity and temporary contracts, inadequate salaries, excessive workloads, role ambiguity, workplace mobbing, limited or no participation in decision-making, administrative pressure, and poor physical working conditions. The study also revealed that, during in-service training sessions at their schools, teachers reported receiving explicit and/or implicit messages suggesting that these problems were their own fault and that they were solely responsible for self-improvement. In addition, teachers reported that they were not involved in the decision-making process regarding these training sessions. These findings highlight how teachers felt unfairly held responsible for challenges largely beyond their control, with little attention given to addressing the root causes of these problems. The research also concluded that teachers felt scapegoated as they are unfairly blamed, experienced occupational alienation and a sense of occupational burnout. Accordingly, it is recommended that organizational problems beyond teachers’ control be addressed and resolved first in order to empower education rather than holding teachers responsible for these problems.

Keywords

• Teaching profession
• private school
• holding teachers responsible
• scapegoating

References

1. Akar Erbil, Ç. (2022). Beyaz mantolu adam öyküsünde ötekileştirmenin görünümleri: Görünümler analizi. Edebî Eleştiri Dergisi, 6(2), 133-141.
2. Apple, M. W. (1987). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315862774
3. Aydın, İ. (2008). İş yaşamında stres (3rd ed.). Pegem Yayınları.
4. Başaran, O., Özen, H., & Yeten, S. (2024). The teacher precariat: Implications and policies in the Turkish educational landscape. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2425365
5. Buyruk, H. (2015). Öğretmen emeğinin dönüşümü. İletişim Yayınları.
6. Campbell, C. (2012). Scapegoat: A history of blaming others. Abrams Press.
7. Cerev, G., & Çoşkun, S. (2020). Özel okul öğretmenlerinin çalışma sorunları üzerine nitel bir araştırma: Elazığ ili örneği. Fırat Üniversitesi Harput Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(13), 125-142.
8. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Sage.
11. Davis, K. (1984). İşletmelerde insan davranışı (K. Tosun, Trans.). İ.Ü. Yayınevi.
12. Demirler, H. (2020). Özel okul öğretmenlerinin çalışma koşulları ve güvencesizlik deneyimleri: Bursa örneği. Çalışma Ortamı Dergisi. https://calismaortami.fisek.org.tr/icerik/ozel-okul-ogretmenlerinin-calisma-kosullari-ve-guvencesizlik-deneyimleri-bursa-ornegi/
13. Ergen, H., & Çokkeser, F. (2022). Türkiye'de özel okullar: Öğretmenlerinin yaşadığı sorunlar. Uluslararası İnovatif Eğitim Araştırmacısı, 2(1), 111-136.
14. Ertürk, S. H. (1972). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Yelkentepe Yayınları.
15. Farber, B. A., & Miller, J. A. (1981). Teacher burnout: A psycho-educational perspective. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 83, 235-243.
16. Frazer, J. G. (2019). Günah Keçisi (Ed.: İsmail Hakkı Yılmaz). Pinhan Yayıncılık.
17. Freeman, M. (2015). Neoliberal policies and human rights. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 141-164.
18. Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.; 30th anniversary ed.). Continuum Press.
19. Giroux, H. A. (2010). Rethinking education as the practice of freedom: Paulo Freire and the promise of critical pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(6), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.715
20. Giroux, H. (2013). Neoliberalism's war against teachers in dark times. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies, 13(6), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613503769
21. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(105), 163-194.
22. Harvey, D. (2021). Neoliberalizmin kısa tarihi. Sel Yayıncılık.
23. Hastings, M. (2019). Neoliberalism and education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
24. Hill, D., & Kumar, R. (Eds.). (2008). Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891858
25. Ingersoll, R. (2007). Short on power, long on responsibility. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/129 Karadavut, T. (2022). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. In H. Tabak, B. Aksu Dünya, & F. Şahin (Eds.), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri (pp. 215-236). Pegem Akademi.
26. Keskin Demirer, D. (2012). Eğitimde piyasalaşma ve öğretmen emeğinde dönüşüm. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1(32), 167-186.
27. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.
28. Kumar, R. (Ed.). (2015). Neoliberalism, critical pedagogy and education (1st ed.). Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659817
29. Kumashiro, K. K. (2012). Bad teacher! How blaming teachers distorts the bigger picture. Teachers College Press.
30. Limberg, L. B. (2008). Phenomenography. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 611-614). Sage.
31. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.
32. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Rand McNally.
33. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
34. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups as qualitative research (Vol. 16). Sage.
35. Orçin, G. (2022). Politik söylemde günah keçisi (scapegoat) motifinin inşası: Orman yangınlarının internet gazetelerine yansımaları. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, 37, 108-135. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.1163064
36. Paşa, M. (2007). Stresin bireysel performans üzerindeki etkisi ve bir uygulama [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Uludağ Üniversitesi.
37. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
38. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
39. Robbins, A. (2023, May). Teachers aren't burnt out. They are being set up to fail. EdWeek. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-teachers-arent-burnt-out-they-are-being-set-up-to-fail/2023/05
40. Sabuncuoğlu, Z., & Tüz, M. (2005). Örgütsel stres kaynakları. Alfa Aktüel Basım.
41. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 783-791.
42. Sever, Y. (2018). Mesleki ve teknik ortaöğretim yönetici ve öğretmenlerinin mesleki eğitimde özelleştirmeye ilişkin görüşleri [Master's thesis, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
43. Standing, G. (2014). The precariat. Bloomsbury Publishing.
44. Şentürk, İ. (2010). Pierre Bourdieu'nun neoliberalizm eleştirisi bağlamında eğitim yönetimini yeniden düşünmek. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 73-98.
45. Thomas, P. (2019, June). Educational accountability and the science of scapegoating the powerless. Medium. https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/educational-accountability-and-the-science-of-scapegoating-the-powerless-1b187a091962
46. Türker, E. (2009). Örgütsel stres faktörleri ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki ve lise öğretmenleri üzerinde bir uygulama [Master's thesis, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
47. Ural, A. (2010). A research on burnout level of teachers. Management and Education, 6(3), 19-24.
48. Ural, A. (2017). Being a teacher in Turkey: Formation, shift, disintegration, and resistance. In F. Mızıkacı & G. Senese (Eds.), A language of freedom and teacher's authority: Case comparisons from Turkey and the United States (pp. 29-40). Lexington.
49. Ural, A. (2022). Türkiye'de yeni liberal dönemdeki eğitimsel eşitsizlikler üzerine. In A. Yıldız (Ed.), Cumhuriyet ve çağdaş eğitim (1st ed., pp. 259-269). Cumhuriyet Kitapları.
50. Ünal, L. I. (2005). Öğretmen imgesinde neoliberal dönüşüm. Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 3(11), 4-15.
51. Vatansever, A., & Gezici Yalçın, M. (2015). "Ne ders olsa veririz" akademisyenin vasıfsız işçiye dönüşümü. İletişim Yayınları.
52. Wang, Y. (2024). Factors affecting employees’ job satisfaction: Organizational and individual levels. SHS Web of Conferences, 181, 10.1051/shsconf/202418101037.
53. Yıldız, A. (2014). Türkiye'de öğretmenlik mesleğinin dönüşümü: İdealist öğretmenden sınava hazırlayıcı teknisyen öğretmene. In Türkiye'de öğretmenlik mesleğinin dönüşümü (pp. 13-26). Kalkedon.
54. Yıldız, A., Ünlü, D., Alica, Z., & Sarpkaya, D. (2014). Neo-liberal bir çağda Mahmut Hoca'yı anımsamak: "Ben tüccar değil, öğretmenim". Eleştirel Pedagoji Dergisi, 25, 5-18.
55. Yıldız, N. (2008). Neoliberal küreselleşme ve eğitim. D.Ü. Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13-32.