Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards

Nuh Yavuzalp; Duygu Kartal İncebacak

doi:10.30828/real.1631148

Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards

Abstract

In educational institutions, school administrators play an important leadership role in the effective and efficient implementation of technology integration. The standards developed by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) provide a comprehensive framework to guide administrators in this area. This study aims to assess technological leadership characteristics of 33 public secondary school administrators in the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey based on ISTE standards. The data collected through a semi-structured interview form were analyzed using a case study approach. The findings, presented in a narrative synthesis under four main themes (technological structure, technological competencies, technological leadership and technological resources), were discussed within the framework of ISTE standards, revealing the factors that shape the leadership roles of school administrators. The results indicate significant tensions between the centrally provided technological infrastructure and its practical implementation, as well as a notable gap between strategic planning and on-the-ground application. Furthermore, teachers' varying competencies and the need for differentiated professional development were identified as critical elements for effective technology leadership. The study suggests that to enhance success, administrators must bridge the gap between planning and practice and foster a supportive school culture for all stakeholders.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Within the scope of the research, approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the relevant university (Protocol No. 2023/209). Participants were asked to fill out informed consent forms before the interview and participation was carried out on a voluntary basis.

References

A’mar, F., & Eleyan, D. (2022). Effect of principal’s technology leadership on teacher’s technology integration. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15145a
Adams, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in educational leadership. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 7(1), 1–2. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/IOJEL/article/view/46590/16108
Adams, D., & Thompson, P. (2025). Transforming School Leadership with Artificial Intelligence: Applications, Implications, and Future Directions. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 24(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2411295
Arar, K., Tlili, A., Salha, S., & Saiti, A. (2025). Rethinking School Leadership and Policy in the Digital AI Era. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 24(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2454098
Altunay, E. (2017). Teachers’ instructional leadership roles in classroom management. Balıkesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 20(37), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.645166
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. L. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269517
Aurangzeb, W., Tahir, T., & Khan, K. (2019). An exploration of college principals’ technology leadership competency assessment. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-II).29
Author (2015). International Journal of Research in E-Learning.

Bağlama, B., Evcimen, E., Altınay, F., Sharma, R. C., Tlili, A., Altınay, Z., ... & Çelebi, M. (2022). Analysis of digital leadership in school management and accessibility of animation-designed game-based learning for sustainability of education for children with special needs. Sustainability, 14(13), 7730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137730
Banoğlu, K., Vanderlinde, R., & Çetin, M. (2016). Investigation of principals’ technology leadership profiles in the context of schools’ learning organization culture and ICT infrastructure: F@tih Project Schools vs. the others. Education and Science, 41(188). http://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6618
Banoğlu, K., Vanderlinde, R., Çetin, M., & Aesaert, K. (2022). Role of school principals’ technology leadership practices in building a learning organization culture in public K-12 schools. Journal of School Leadership, 33(1), 66-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221134010
Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development in education. London: Sage. Chang, I.-H. (2012). The effect of principals’ technological leadership on teachers’ technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 328–340.
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dexter, S. (2008). Leadership for IT in Schools. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (Eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 543-554). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_32
Dexter, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2020). What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1668316
Ergin, O., İltaş, İ., Gülnar Çeliğ, C., Balcı, C., & Cerit, Ö. (2022). The relationship between school heads' democratic leadership behavior and school culture. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research, 9(87), 1770. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.3207
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty‐first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124–137.
Gök, A., & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Investigation of FATİH Project within the scope of teachers, school administrators and YEGITEK administrators’ opinions: A multiple case study. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(2), 339–352. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/161123
Gupta, P. (2016). Roles and responsibilities of a school leader in technology integration. Retrieved from http://edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/2541-role-ofschool-leader-principal-in-school-technology
Håkansson Lindqvist, M. (2019). School leaders’ practices for innovative use of digital technologies in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12782
Hamzah, M. I. M., Juraime, F., & Mansor, A. N. (2016). Malaysian principals’ technology leadership practices and curriculum management. Creative Education, 7(7), 922–930. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.77096
ISTE. (2023). ISTE Standards for Students, Educators, Education Leaders, and Coaches. International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/
Jameson, J. (2013). E-leadership in higher education: The fifth "age" of educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 889–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12103
Karakose, T., Polat, H., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Examining teachers' perspectives on school principals' digital leadership roles and technology capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(23), 13448.
Karlin, M., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Ozogul, G., & Liao, Y. (2018). K-12 technology leaders: Reported practices of technology professional development planning, implementation, and evaluation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 722–748.
Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Known, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Minaz, M. B., Özel, Y., & Ay, M. (2022). The relationship between principals’ technological leadership competence and school effectiveness. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(4), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.570
MoNE OGM. (2015). Turkish Education System and Secondary Education. https://ogm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_06/13153013_TES_ve_ORTAYYRETYM_son10_2.pdf
MoNE SGB. (2024). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2023/2024. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_10/11230736_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2023_2024.pdf
Paunil, L. O. V. (2024). The mediating effects of generational affiliation on the influence of principals’ digital leadership on teachers’ technological self-efficacy. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(4), 1250–1267. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.04.13
Raman, A., & Shariff, S. (2018). Relationship Between Technology Leadership, ICT Facility, Competency, Commitments Towards Effectiveness of School Mangement Tasks in Schools. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v7i1.1292
Raman, A., Thannimalai, R., & Ismail, S. N. (2019). Principals’ technology leadership and its effect on teachers’ technology integration in 21st-century classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12428a
Richardson, J. W., Bathon, J., Flora, K. L., & Lewis, W. D. (2012). NETS·A scholarship: A review of published literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782600
Santos, A. R., & Cajucom, R. L. (2020). Domains and standards of school leadership: Evaluation of tertiary school teachers. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 6(3), 124-128. http://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.63.4
Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2012). Evidence-Based Strategies for Leading 21st Century Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Corwin Press.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
Sterrett, W., & Richardson, J. W. (2019). The change-ready leadership of technology-savvy superintendents. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0160
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use. Computers and Education, 94, 134-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
Turan, S., Polatcan, M. ve Cansoy, R. (2020). Technology Leadership in Turkish Schools: A Systematic Review. In
Durnalı, M., (Ed.) (2020), Utilizing technologies, knowledge and smart systems in educational administration and leadership (pp. 59-79). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1408-5.ch004
Yu, C., & Prince, D. L. (2016). Aspiring school administrators' perceived ability to meet technology standards and technological needs for professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(4), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1215168
Yuting, Z., Adams, D., & Lee, K. C. S. (2022). The relationship between technology leadership and teacher ICT competency in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10285-10307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11037-0

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Leadership in Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Nuh Yavuzalp ^*
0000-0001-9275-275X
Türkiye

Duygu Kartal İncebacak
0000-0001-6732-6572
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 28, 2025

Submission Date

February 11, 2025

Acceptance Date

August 10, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 10 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1631148

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA55SU89GE

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yavuzalp, N., & Kartal İncebacak, D. (2025). Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 10(3), 817-866. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1631148

AMA

1.Yavuzalp N, Kartal İncebacak D. Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards. REAL. 2025;10(3):817-866. doi:10.30828/real.1631148

Chicago

Yavuzalp, Nuh, and Duygu Kartal İncebacak. 2025. “Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 10 (3): 817-66. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1631148.

EndNote

Yavuzalp N, Kartal İncebacak D (September 1, 2025) Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 10 3 817–866.

IEEE

[1]N. Yavuzalp and D. Kartal İncebacak, “Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards”, REAL, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 817–866, Sept. 2025, doi: 10.30828/real.1631148.

ISNAD

Yavuzalp, Nuh - Kartal İncebacak, Duygu. “Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership 10/3 (September 1, 2025): 817-866. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1631148.

JAMA

1.Yavuzalp N, Kartal İncebacak D. Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards. REAL. 2025;10:817–866.

MLA

Yavuzalp, Nuh, and Duygu Kartal İncebacak. “Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards”. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, vol. 10, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 817-66, doi:10.30828/real.1631148.

Vancouver

1.Nuh Yavuzalp, Duygu Kartal İncebacak. Technological Leadership of Turkish Secondary School Administrators According to ISTE Standards. REAL. 2025 Sep. 1;10(3):817-66. doi:10.30828/real.1631148