THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION IN THE EFFECT OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE ON PERFORMANCE

Abstract

Purpose- It is known that research assistants are in constant interaction with their advisors on various issues related to their thesis processes and other academic studies as well as their administrative work during their academic development. The literature has some studies on the factors that increase the performance of research assistants in these processes, as well as on the factors that adversely affect their performance. At this point, the quality of the research assistants' relationships with their advisors and their level of identification with the university they work for can affect their academic and administrative performances. Accordingly, the study aims to investigate the mediating role of organizational identification in the effect of the quality of the relationship between research assistants and their advisors on their performance. Methodology- Research data were collected from research assistants working for public universities in Turkey. With 201 completed questionnaires, the model with mediation analysis was tested by the researchers, based on the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS 4 software. Also, descriptive data were analyzed by SPSS 25 software. Findings- The results of the research reveal that LMX influences research assistants’ job performance via their advisors. In addition, organizational identification has a partial mediating role in the effect of research assistants' relationship with their advisors on their job performance. Conclusions- It is considered that research assistants' quality relations with their advisors, as well as identification with the universities they work for, can be significantly beneficial to their job performance. The study is expected to contribute performance determinants of research assistants. Future studies can be carried out on mediation effects by adding different variables to the model.

Keywords

• Leader-member exchange
• organizational identification
• job performance
• research assistants
• PLS-SEM

References

1. Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1). 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568
2. Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A., (2009). Leader-member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. Leadership Quarterly, 20(3). 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.009
3. Azar, M., & Shafighi, A. A., (2013). The effect of work motivation on employees’ job performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 63(1). 6895-6907.
4. Brayfield, A. H., & Crockett, W. H., (1955). Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 52(5). 396– 424.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045899
5. Brower, H. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Tan, H. H., (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00040-0
6. Çankır, B., & Palalar Alkan, D., (2018). Lider-üye etkileşiminin örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisinde dağıtım adaletinin aracılık rolü - the mediating role of distributive justice in the relationship between leader member exchange and organizational ıdentification. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 10(3), 929-949. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2018.507
7. Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A., (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x
8. Charlotte R., G., & David V., D., (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues, 82(6), 827- 844. Journal of Applied Psychology.

9. Cohen, J., (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 8721.ep10768783
10. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J., (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations. A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030- 5073(75)90005-7
11. Deconinck, J. B., (2011). The effects of leader-member exchange and organizational identification on performance and turnover among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 31(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134310102
12. Diamantidis, A. D., & Chatzoglou, P., (2019). Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2018-0012
13. Dick, R. Van., (2005). My job is my castle: ıdentification in organizational contexts. In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2004. (Vol. 19, pp. 171–203). https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013311.ch6
14. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V., (1994). Organizational ımages and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
15. Efraty, D., & Wolfe, D. M., (1988). The effect of organizational identification on employee affective and performance responses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016752
16. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L., (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.87.3.565
17. Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J., (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2015.12.008
18. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using pls-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01605
19. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V., (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
20. Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A., (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
21. Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030- 5073(82)90236-7
22. Graen, George B., & Uhl-Bien, M., (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
23. Griffin, R. W., (1981). A longitudinal ınvestigation of task characteristics relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/255826
24. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M., (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Second Edition. In California: Sage, ISBN: 9781483377445
25. Hair, Joseph F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M., (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
26. Hameed, A., & Waheed, A., (2011). Employee development and ıts affect on employee performance: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(13), 224–229.
27. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M., (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
28. Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A., (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
29. Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E., (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.84.5.680
30. Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W., (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159587
31. Kandemir, H., & Özdaşlı, K., (2019). Olumlu informel iletişimin personel güçlendirme aracılığı ile iş yeri mutluluğuna etkisi: araştırma görevlileri üzerine bir araştırma. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(18), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.33692/avrasyad.695376
32. Kasalak, G., & Aksu, M. B., (2014). Araştırma Görevlilerinin Algıladıkları örgütsel desteğin örgütsel sinizm ile ilişkisi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 115–133.
33. Katrinli, A., Atabay, G., Gunay, G., & Guneri, B., (2008). Leader-member exchange, organizational identification and the mediating role of job involvement for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(4), 354–362.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04809.x
34. Kesen, M., (2015). Örgütsel demokrasinin çalışan performansı üzerine etkileri: Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü. Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 6(2), 535–562.
35. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B., (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/256874
36. Kock, F., Berbekova, A., & Assaf, A. G., (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOURMAN.2021.104330
37. Kock, N., (2017). Common method bias: A full collinearity assessmentmethod for PLS-SEM. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications (pp. 245–257). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_11
38. Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S., (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
39. Krishnan, V. R., (2005). Leader-member exchange, transformational leadership, and value system. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 10(1), 14-21
40. Lee, J., (2005). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(8), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633728
41. Loi, R., Chan, K. W., & Lam, L. W., (2014). Leader-member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: A social identity perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12028
42. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E., (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
43. Mahsud, R., Prussia, G., & Yukl, G., (2010). Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011056932
44. Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M., Albacete-Sáez, C. A., & Lloréns-Montes, F. J., (2004). The impact of environmental characteristics on TQM principles and organizational performance. Omega, 32(6), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.02.005
45. Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M., (2001). Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other’s effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.697
46. Merli, R., Preziosi, M., Acampora, A., & Ali, F., (2019). Why should hotels go green? Insights from guests experience in green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.04.022
47. Murali, S. B., Basit, A., & Hassan, Z., (2017). Impact of job stress on employee performance. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Management (IJABM), 5(2), 13–33.
48. Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G., (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modelling, Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
49. Özutku, H., Ağca, V., & Cevrioğlu, E., (2008). Lider-üye etkileşim teorisi çerçevesinde, yönetici-ast etkileşimi ile örgütsel bağlılık boyutları ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişki: ampirik bir inceleme. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 193–210.
50. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P., (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
51. Rahman, S. U., & Bullock, P., (2005). Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organisational performance relationships: An empirical investigation. Omega, 33(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.008
52. Riketta, M., (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
53. Sahibzada, U. F., Jianfeng, C., Latif, K. F., Shah, S. A., & Sahibzada, H. F., (2020). Refuelling knowledge management processes towards organisational performance: mediating role of creative organisational learning. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1787802
54. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A., (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.658656
55. Shahzadi, I., Javed, A., Pirzada, S. S., Nasreen, S., & Khanam, F. (2014). Impact of Employee Motivation on Employee Performance. European Journal of Business and Management Online), 6(23), 159-166.
56. Tajfel, H., & Turner, John, C., (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Political Psychology: Key Readings in Social Psychology (276-293).
57. Tak, and Aydemir, B. A., (2004). Örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerine iki görgül çalışma. 12.Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 27-29 Mayıs 2004, 59–63.
58. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B., (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
59. Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R., & Hartnell, C. A., (2009). Organizational justice, voluntary learning behavior, and job performance: A test of the mediating effects of identification and leader-member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(8), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.611
60. Wang, C. J. (2016). Does leader-member exchange enhance performance in the hospitality industry?: The mediating roles of task motivation and creativity. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 969–987. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2014- 0513
61. YÖK. (2022). Öğretim Elemanı İstatistikleri. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
62. Yukl, G., O’Donnell, M., & Taber, T., (2009). Influence of leader behaviors on the leader/member exchange relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910952697
63. Zehir, C., & Erdogan, E., (2011). The association between organizational silence and ethical leadership through employee performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1389–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.054
64. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257