Research Article

FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE

Volume: 13 Number: 1 June 30, 2026

FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE

Abstract

Purpose- This study explores the conceptual transition from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) toward emerging Artificial Intelligence acceptance perspectives while comparatively examining technological development and its associations with sustainability indicators in the United States, South Korea and Turkiye. Despite growing literature on AI adoption, cross-country assessments linking AI capacity with environmental performance remain limited. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the alignment between national AI development trajectories and sustainability outcomes. Methodology- The research adopts a comparative descriptive design based on secondary data from internationally recognized reports and statistical databases. Country-level indicators related to AI investment, innovation capacity, carbon intensity, renewable energy use and environmental performance are systematically compared. The study does not aim to establish causal relationships but rather to identify associative patterns across countries at different stages of technological development. Findings- Results suggest that higher levels of AI investment and technological capacity are descriptively associated with improvements in energy efficiency, reductions in carbon emissions and enhanced environmental performance. However, the strength of this relationship varies according to national technological readiness and institutional capacity. The United States shows the strongest alignment between AI development and sustainability improvement, South Korea demonstrates moderate progress, and Turkiye shows ongoing technological development, although sustainability gains remain comparatively limited due to structural and implementation challenges. Conclusion- The study extends technology acceptance discussions beyond the individual level by presenting a comparative national framework linking AI adoption with sustainable development outcomes. Findings indicate that technological investment alone is insufficient; effective sustainability performance requires institutional capacity and coordinated policy implementation. The results offer practical insights for policymakers seeking to align digital transformation strategies with long-term sustainability goals, while future research should broaden comparative scope and examine sectoral and long-term impacts of AI adoption on sustainability performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  2. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Ismagilova, E., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence
  3. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660.
  4. IEA. (2024). World energy statistics 2024. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-statistics-2024
  5. Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2022). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(6), 1057–1078.
  6. Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95.
  7. McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi
  8. OECD. (2024). AI investment indicators 2024. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ai-investment-indicators-2024.pdf

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

February 12, 2026

Acceptance Date

May 16, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 13 Number: 1

APA
Savaşkan, D. E. (2026). FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE. Research Journal of Business and Management, 13(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047
AMA
1.Savaşkan DE. FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE. RJBM. 2026;13(1):40-49. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047
Chicago
Savaşkan, Dr. Elif. 2026. “FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 13 (1): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047.
EndNote
Savaşkan DE (June 1, 2026) FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE. Research Journal of Business and Management 13 1 40–49.
IEEE
[1]D. E. Savaşkan, “FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE”, RJBM, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 40–49, June 2026, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047.
ISNAD
Savaşkan, Dr. Elif. “FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 13/1 (June 1, 2026): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047.
JAMA
1.Savaşkan DE. FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE. RJBM. 2026;13:40–49.
MLA
Savaşkan, Dr. Elif. “FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 13, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 40-49, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047.
Vancouver
1.Dr. Elif Savaşkan. FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE. RJBM. 2026 Jun. 1;13(1):40-9. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annually and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.