THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT AND UNETHICAL PRO-ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: THE ROLE OF MORAL DISENGAGEMENT
Abstract
Purpose - As one of the few studies on unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB), this study hypothesizes that affective commitment predicts UPB through the mediation of moral disengagement. It was also proposed that ethical leadership affects the hypothesized relationship.
Methodology - 208 employees (98 males and 110 females) from different companies located in Istanbul, Turkey formed the sample of this study. A multidimensional questionnaire with seven-point interval scale was applied to measure all substantive variables used in this study. Findings- The results of mediation analysis revealed that people with higher affective commitment engaged in more UPB, and that this effect was mediated by moral disengagement. In addition, the results of moderated mediation analysis showed that the mediation relationship was stronger when employees perceived a lower level of ethical leadership in the organization.
Conclusion- We found that affective commitment encourages UPB through the mechanism
of moral disengagement. Besides, this effect is stronger when the ethical
leadership is perceived to be low as opposed to being high. Our results extend
knowledge of UPB by highlighting the importance of ethical leadership, and open up new avenues of research on
the ethical challenges of prosocial motives, attitudes, and behaviors. Further
theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Keywords
References
- Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. 1990, “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 63, pp. 1-18.
- Bandura, A. 1977, “Social learning theory”. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. 1986, “Social foundations of thought & action”. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G., & Pastorelli, C. 1996, “Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 71, pp. 364-374. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986, “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, pp.1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00223514.51.6.1173
- Blau, P. 1964, “Exchange and power in social life”. New York: John Wiley
- Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. 2001, “Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model”. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471-499). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
- Brislin, R. W. 1986, “The wording and translation of research instrument”. In W. Lonner & J. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 30, 2017
Submission Date
June 2, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 3