ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND INTENTIONS TOWARDS TYPES OF WHISTLEBLOWING: THE CASE OF TURKEY AND ETHIOPIA
Abstract
Purpose- Whistleblowing, is one of the rarely studied topics in non-western cultures, and none in Ethiopia. Hence, this study explores whistleblowing and the contribution of organizational culture (OC) types on different modes of whistleblowing intentions in Ethiopia along with cross-cultural comparison of the theoretical model in Turkey.
Methodology- Totally 528 employees (Ethiopia, N=274 and Turkey, N=254) were selected as participants. Four organizational culture types and six dimensions of whistleblowing are measured using a multidimensional questionnaire with five-point interval scale.
Findings- Analyses revealed that hierarchical culture significantly and positively contributed to external, anonymous, and formal whistleblowing. Alternatively, clan culture had significant positive contribution to internal and informal whistleblowing, and negative contribution to external whistleblowing. However, there were significant variations in terms of nationality.
Conclusion- The dominant values and beliefs embedded within the culture of an organization tend to predict the most likely preferred and accepted methods of whistleblowing in that particular organization.
Keywords
References
- Alvesson, M. 2002, “Understanding organizational culture”. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Bagozzi R.P. & Yi, Y. 1988, “On the evaluation of structural equation models”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), pp.7494.
- Barnett, T. 1992, “A preliminary investigation of the relationship between selected organizational characteristics and external whistleblowing by employees”. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(12), pp. 949-959.
- Chang, K., & Lu, L. 2007, “Characteristics of organizational culture, stressors and wellbeing: The case of Taiwanese organizations”. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22 (6), pp. 549-568. doi: 10.1108/02683940710778431
- Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. 2006, “Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework”. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Chung, J., Monroe, G., & Thorne, L. 2004, “An examination of factors affecting external and internal whistle-blowing by auditors”. Paper presented at research seminar, session 1, University of NSW School of Accounting, Australia. Retrieved from http://wwwdocs.fce.unsw.edu.au/accounting/news/ seminars2004_s1/paper03.pdf, (May 13, 2016).
- Donkin, M., Smith, R., & Brown, A. J. 2008, “How do officials report? Internal and external whistleblowing”. In J. A. Brown (Eds.), Whistleblowing in the Australian public sector: Enhancing the theory and practice of internal witness management in public sector organizations (pp. 83-108). Canberra: ANUE Press.
- Dworkin, T. M., & Baucus, M. S. 1998, “Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowing processes”. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, pp. 1281-1298.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 30, 2017
Submission Date
September 19, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 4