As the world economy continues to become more globalized, foreign direct investment (FDI) continues to gain prominence as a form of international economic transactions and as an instrument of international economic integration. In recent years, developing countries like Nigeria with large home markets and some entrepreneurial skills have produced large numbers of rapidly growing and profitable multinational enterprises (MNEs). These MNEs are like their counterparts in other countrirs, looking for markets where they have comparative advantage to invest in. It is therefore important to create the conditions that would attract FDI from such MNEs. In this context, this study outlined the reasons why some Nigerian enterprises decide on outward FDI, their levels of success, and what other countries particularly in sub-‐Saharan Africa must do to attract FDI from Nigeria. It also examines the flow of FDI to Africa since the 1970s and examined the determinants of FDI with a view to understanding whether the existing policy and operational framework are sufficient for attracting investments. It further discusses the factors that influence FDI, the role of FDI, FDI trends in Africa, sectorial allocation of FDI in Africa, why Africa has lagged behind in receiving FDI, and the various modes of entry. The study ends with clear recommendations for MNEs and policy makers 1. INTRODUCTION Over the last decade and a half, the world has witnessed the phenomenal rise of the Nigerian multinational enterprises (MNEs) in various sectors. MNE in this context is viewed as one that has operating subsidiaries, branches, or affiliates located in foreign countries. It also includes firms in service activities such as consulting, accounting, construction, legal, advertising, entertainment, banking, telecommunications, and lodging (Eiteman et al., 2010). MNEs have global outreach and many of them are owned by a mixture of domestic and foreign shareholders. Many indigenous Nigerian companies have developed beyond expectations and having captured large shares of the Nigerian home markets, decided to tap into global markets with increased competitive. They have expanded into other parts of sub-‐Saharan Africa including and stretches into Europe, North America, Asia and the Middle East. Instead of waiting to receive foreign direct investment (FDI) from the western nations as is usually the norm, Nigerian companies are on the move, spreading their tentacles into other Afican countries countries and the world over, a hitherto reserved place for the European and American companies. Most of the FDIs by Nigerian companies have been in the financial services sector, for example First Year: 2014 Volume:1 Issue: 3 Bank of Nigeria Ltd has opened offices in South Africa, the Democratic Republic of Congo as well as in London, Paris, Beijing and Abu Dhabi (First Bank of Nigeria Plc 2011). GTBank has offices in Cote d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and the United Kingdom, while United Bank of Africa (UBA) has offices in 19 other countries namely Ghana, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Cameroun, Gabon, Guinea, Kenya, Liberia, Mozambique, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Chad, Congo DR, Congo Brazzaville, the United Kingdom and the United States. Other companies with foreign offices include Zenith Bank Plc, Access Bank Plc, Diamond Bank Plc, and Industrial and General Insurance (IGI) with offices in Rwanda and Uganda (Asiedu, 2006). In the oil and gas sector Oando Plc, an integrated energy group has operations across West Africa in Ghana, Togo, Liberia, and licenses for oil exploration from Turkey and Zambia. The company is building sub-‐Saharan Africa’s largest gas pipeline network and with its foray into power business, the company is poised to contribute several captive power plants to the Nigerian and sub-‐ regional markets (Oando Annual Report & Accounts 2012). There is also the Sahara Group with offices in Nigeria, Cote d’Ivoire, United Arab Emirates, Switzerland, Singapore, Brazil and the Isle of Man. In the telecommunications sector, Globacom Limited operates in the Republic of Benin and Ghana, and has also acquired licenses to operate in Cote d’Ivoire. It has a reputation as one of the fastest growing mobile service providers in the world and aims to be recognized as the biggest and best mobile network in Africa (Anyanwu, 2012). 2. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a key element in this rapidly evolving international economic integration, also referred to as globalization. According to the Organization for Economic Co-‐operation and Development (2008) FDI provides a means for creating direct, stable and long-‐lasting links between economies. Under the right policy environment, it can serve as an important vehicle for local enterprise development, and it may also help improve the competitive position of both the recipient (“host”) and the investing (“home”) economy. In particular, FDI encourages the transfer of technology and know-‐how between economies, as is the case with China, India, Phillipines, etc. It also provides an opportunity for the host economy to promote its products more widely in international markets. FDI, in addition to its positive effect on the development of international trade, is an important source of capital for a range of host and home economies. The significant growth in the level of FDI in recent decades, and its international pervasiveness, reflect both an increase in the size and number of individual FDI transactions, as well as the growing diversification of enterprises across economies and industrial sectors. Large multinational enterprises (MNE) are traditionally the dominant players in such cross-‐border FDI transactions. This development has coincided with an increased propensity for MNEs to participate in foreign trade. In recent years, it is believed that small and medium-‐size enterprises have also become increasingly involved in FDI (OECD 2008). 2.1 Overview of Foreign Direct Investment Fo reign Direct Investment (FDI) according to World Economic Report (2007, p.245) is defined as an investment involving a long‑term relationship and reflecting a lasting interest and control by a resident entity in one economy (foreign direct investor or parent enterprise) in an enterprise resident in an economy other than that of the foreign direct investor (FDI enterprise or affiliate enterprise or foreign affiliate). FDI implies that the investor exerts a significant degree of influence on the management of the enterprise resident in the other economy or economies. Such investment involves both the initial transaction between the two entities and all subsequent transactions between them and among foreign affiliates; both incorporated and unincorporated (Grant 2010). FDI may be undertaken by individuals as well as business entities. Flows of FDI comprise capital provided (either directly or through other related enterprises) by a foreign direct investor to an enterprise, or capital received from an investing enterprise by a foreign direct investor. FDI has three components: equity capital, reinvested earnings and intra‑company loans (UNCTAD 2012, p.245). In a different premise, Morisset, (2000) argues that FDI is a type of investment that involves the injection of foreign funds into an enterprise that operates in a different country of origin from the investor. Investors are granted management and voting rights if the level of ownership is greater than or equal to 10% of ordinary shares. Shares ownership amounting to less than the stated amount is termed portfolio investment and is not considered as FDI. This does not include foreign investments in stock markets. Instead FDI refers more specifically to the investment of foreign assets into domestic goods and services. Sachs and Sievers (1998) contend that FDIs are generally favoured over equity investment, which tend to flow out of an economy at the first sign of trouble, which leaves countries more susceptible to shocks in their money markets. FDIs can be classified as inward FDI or outward FDI depending on the direction of the flow of money. Inward FDI occurs when foreign capital is invested in local resources while outward FDI is also referred to as ‘‘direct investment abroad’’ (UNCTAD 2007). Foreign investments create opportunity for improving the firm’s cash flow and enhance shareholders wealth. Hence, it is the responsibility of the firm’s management to develop strategies, which involve the penetration of foreign markets, which will yield the highest rate of return or return on investment (ROI). FDI occurs when a firm invests directly in facilities to produce and or market a product in a foreign country. FDI can be done in two main categories; the first is Greenfield investment in the form of the establishment of a new operation in a foreign country (Loungani and Assaf 2001, p 5). Secondly, FDI can occur by acquiring or merging with an existing firm in a foreign country. FDI can act as a powerful catalyst for economic change, although the option is expensive because a firm must bear the costs of establishing production facilities in a foreign country or acquiring a foreign enterprise (Hill, 2009). FDI is also risky because of the problems associated with doing business in a different culture where the “rules of the game” may be different from that of the investor’s country. If the venture fails, the money invested will be lost and there is always the risk of expropriation. Hence investment decisions by the firms are expected to improve productivity and respond to changes in the competitive environment. Foreign investment also offers technology transfer, management of know-‐how and access to foreign markets. 2.2. Factors influencing FDI Why do companies go abroad? The “eclectic paradigm” attributed to Dunning (1977, 1993) provides a theoretical
Bölüm | Articles |
---|---|
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Eylül 2014 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2014 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3 |
Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.