Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 166 - 173, 31.12.2023

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Al-dalahmeh, M., Masa’deh, R., Khalaf, R.K., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2018). The effect of employee engagement on organizational performance via the mediating role of job satisfaction: the case of IT employees in Jordanian banking sector. Modern Applied Science, 12(6), 17-43.
  • Chen, T., Hao, S., Ding, K., Feng, X., Li, G., & Liang, X. (2020). The impact of organizational support on employee performance. Employee Relatations International Journal., 42, 166–179.
  • Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: ıs social exchange theory still relevant? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 456-481.
  • Gadi, P.D. & Hung-Kee, D. M. (2020). Work engagement and turnover intention: the moderating role of perceived supervisor support and perceived organizational support. International Journal of Advance Science and Technology, 29, 1064-1073.
  • Ghazali, H., Nashuki, N.M., & Othman, M. (2018). The influence of perceived organizational support (pos), perceived supervisory support (PSS) and organizational commitment (OC) towards intention to leave or intention to stay: A case of casual dining restaurants in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1884-1902.
  • Ghosh P., Rai A., & Singh, A. (2016). Support at work to fuel engagement: A study of employees of Indian banking sector. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(2), 1–10.
  • Gusti N.G., & Gede, R. (2021). The effect of perceived organizational support on employee engagement and employee performance. Science, Engineering and Social Science Series,5(3), 260 – 264.
  • Hameduddin, T. & Fernandez, S. (2019). Employee engagement as administrative reform: testing the efficacy of the OPM’s employee engagement initiative. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 355-369.
  • Imran, M. Y., Elahi, N. S., Abid, G., Ashfaq, F. & Ilyas, S. (2020). Impact of perceived organizational support on work engagement: mediating mechanism of thriving and flourishing. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 82(6), 1-18.
  • Isa, A.B., & Ibrahim, H.B. (2020). The mediating effect of perceived organizational support between talent development and employee engagement at Malaysian glcs. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10), 505-517.
  • Karim D. N., Baset M. A., & Rahman M. M. (2019). The effect of perceived organizational support on intention to stay: The mediating role of job involvement. The Jahangirnagar Journal of Business Studies, 8(1), 21–30.
  • Khajuria, G., & Khan, N. (2022). Perceived organisational support and employee engagement: A literature review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 1366-1384.
  • Kumar K. (2019). The effects of perceived organizational support (POS) and perceived organizational justice (POJ) on employee engagement (EE) of Indian employee in information technology. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(IC2), 209–215.
  • Lee, M.C., Idris, M.A. & Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257-282.
  • Musenze, I. A., Mayende, T. S., Wampande, A. J., Kasango, J., & Emojong, O. R. (2021). Mechanism between perceived organizational support and work engagement: explanatory role of self-efficacy. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 37(4), 471-495.
  • Saks, A.M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19-38.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  • Shuck, B. (2020). Employee Engagement: A Research Overview, Routledge, Abingdon.
  • Stefanidis, A., & Strogilos, V. (2020). Perceived organizational support and work engagement of employees with children with disabilities. Personnel Review, 50(1), 186-206.
  • Tan, L., Wang, Y., Qian, W., & Lu, H. (2020). Leader humor and employee job crafting: The role of employee-perceived organizational support and work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2592-2603.
  • Wan, P., & Saidin, K.B. (2018). A study of relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement of administrative staff in newly-established universities of China. Journal of Social Science Research, 12(2), 2756-2763.
  • Wang, X., Guchait, P., Pa¸samehmeto˘ glu, A. (2020). Why should errors be tolerated? Perceived organizational support, organization-based self-esteem and psychological well-being. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(5), 1987–2006.
  • William, S., Andrea, D., Ellinger, F., & Sewon, K. (2021). Examining the relationships among managerial coaching, perceived organizational support, and job engagement in the US higher education context. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5/6), 563-584.
  • Xiang, H., Chen, Y., & Zhao, F. (2017). Inclusive Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support, and Work Engagement: The Moderating Role of Leadership-Member Exchange Relationship, 7th International Conference on Social Network, Communication and Education (SNCE), Shenyang, Peoples r china, Acsr-Advances in Computer Science Rese

THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 166 - 173, 31.12.2023

Öz

Purpose- For the organization to strive in today's competitive environment, managers should provide a working environment that is conducive and supportive to its members/employees. Human beings like to be recognized, valued, and taken care of while they are performing their duties. The study examines the influence of perceived organisation support on employees' engagement in small and medium enterprises in Tanzania.
Methodology- The study is guided by the Social Exchange Theory which explains that the amount of care and support given to the employees is the same amount of commitment they will give back to the organisation and hence engagement. The study is positivist where cross-sectional design was used to study the relationship between perceived organisation support and employees' engagement in SMEs, and it was done in three regions which are Dar es Salaam, Morogoro and Manyara. The study used stratified sampling and structural equation modelling was used to analyze data.
Findings- The findings showed that organisation support has a significant influence on employees' engagement (both job and organisation engagement).
Conclusion- The study recommends that SMEs should support employees by matching their interests with those of the SMEs. When these interests match, is where the employees feel valued and respected and perceive that the organisation cares about their well-being.

Kaynakça

  • Al-dalahmeh, M., Masa’deh, R., Khalaf, R.K., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2018). The effect of employee engagement on organizational performance via the mediating role of job satisfaction: the case of IT employees in Jordanian banking sector. Modern Applied Science, 12(6), 17-43.
  • Chen, T., Hao, S., Ding, K., Feng, X., Li, G., & Liang, X. (2020). The impact of organizational support on employee performance. Employee Relatations International Journal., 42, 166–179.
  • Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: ıs social exchange theory still relevant? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 456-481.
  • Gadi, P.D. & Hung-Kee, D. M. (2020). Work engagement and turnover intention: the moderating role of perceived supervisor support and perceived organizational support. International Journal of Advance Science and Technology, 29, 1064-1073.
  • Ghazali, H., Nashuki, N.M., & Othman, M. (2018). The influence of perceived organizational support (pos), perceived supervisory support (PSS) and organizational commitment (OC) towards intention to leave or intention to stay: A case of casual dining restaurants in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1884-1902.
  • Ghosh P., Rai A., & Singh, A. (2016). Support at work to fuel engagement: A study of employees of Indian banking sector. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(2), 1–10.
  • Gusti N.G., & Gede, R. (2021). The effect of perceived organizational support on employee engagement and employee performance. Science, Engineering and Social Science Series,5(3), 260 – 264.
  • Hameduddin, T. & Fernandez, S. (2019). Employee engagement as administrative reform: testing the efficacy of the OPM’s employee engagement initiative. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 355-369.
  • Imran, M. Y., Elahi, N. S., Abid, G., Ashfaq, F. & Ilyas, S. (2020). Impact of perceived organizational support on work engagement: mediating mechanism of thriving and flourishing. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 82(6), 1-18.
  • Isa, A.B., & Ibrahim, H.B. (2020). The mediating effect of perceived organizational support between talent development and employee engagement at Malaysian glcs. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10), 505-517.
  • Karim D. N., Baset M. A., & Rahman M. M. (2019). The effect of perceived organizational support on intention to stay: The mediating role of job involvement. The Jahangirnagar Journal of Business Studies, 8(1), 21–30.
  • Khajuria, G., & Khan, N. (2022). Perceived organisational support and employee engagement: A literature review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 1366-1384.
  • Kumar K. (2019). The effects of perceived organizational support (POS) and perceived organizational justice (POJ) on employee engagement (EE) of Indian employee in information technology. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(IC2), 209–215.
  • Lee, M.C., Idris, M.A. & Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257-282.
  • Musenze, I. A., Mayende, T. S., Wampande, A. J., Kasango, J., & Emojong, O. R. (2021). Mechanism between perceived organizational support and work engagement: explanatory role of self-efficacy. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 37(4), 471-495.
  • Saks, A.M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19-38.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  • Shuck, B. (2020). Employee Engagement: A Research Overview, Routledge, Abingdon.
  • Stefanidis, A., & Strogilos, V. (2020). Perceived organizational support and work engagement of employees with children with disabilities. Personnel Review, 50(1), 186-206.
  • Tan, L., Wang, Y., Qian, W., & Lu, H. (2020). Leader humor and employee job crafting: The role of employee-perceived organizational support and work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2592-2603.
  • Wan, P., & Saidin, K.B. (2018). A study of relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement of administrative staff in newly-established universities of China. Journal of Social Science Research, 12(2), 2756-2763.
  • Wang, X., Guchait, P., Pa¸samehmeto˘ glu, A. (2020). Why should errors be tolerated? Perceived organizational support, organization-based self-esteem and psychological well-being. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(5), 1987–2006.
  • William, S., Andrea, D., Ellinger, F., & Sewon, K. (2021). Examining the relationships among managerial coaching, perceived organizational support, and job engagement in the US higher education context. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5/6), 563-584.
  • Xiang, H., Chen, Y., & Zhao, F. (2017). Inclusive Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support, and Work Engagement: The Moderating Role of Leadership-Member Exchange Relationship, 7th International Conference on Social Network, Communication and Education (SNCE), Shenyang, Peoples r china, Acsr-Advances in Computer Science Rese
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Judith J. Msangi 0009-0005-9750-3118

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Msangi, J. J. (2023). THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES. Research Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 166-173.
AMA Msangi JJ. THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES. RJBM. Aralık 2023;10(4):166-173.
Chicago Msangi, Judith J. “THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES”. Research Journal of Business and Management 10, sy. 4 (Aralık 2023): 166-73.
EndNote Msangi JJ (01 Aralık 2023) THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES. Research Journal of Business and Management 10 4 166–173.
IEEE J. J. Msangi, “THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES”, RJBM, c. 10, sy. 4, ss. 166–173, 2023.
ISNAD Msangi, Judith J. “THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES”. Research Journal of Business and Management 10/4 (Aralık 2023), 166-173.
JAMA Msangi JJ. THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES. RJBM. 2023;10:166–173.
MLA Msangi, Judith J. “THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES”. Research Journal of Business and Management, c. 10, sy. 4, 2023, ss. 166-73.
Vancouver Msangi JJ. THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED ORGANISATION SUPPORT ON EMPLOYEES’ ENGAGEMENT IN TANZANIA: A CASE OF SMES. RJBM. 2023;10(4):166-73.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.