Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 174 - 186, 31.12.2023

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aghaz, A., Sheikh, A. (2016). Cyberloafing and job burnout: An investigation in the knowledge-intensive sector, Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 51-60.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Al-Shuaibi, A. S. İ., Shamsudin, F.M., Subramaniam, C. (2013). Do Human Resource Management Practices Matter in Reducing Cyberloafing at Work: Evidence from Jordan, The 2013 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, The West East Institute, 37-47, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Anandarajan, M., Devine, P., & Simmers, C. (2004). A multidimensional scaling approach to personal web usage in the workplace. In M. Anandarajan & C. Simmers (Eds.), Personal web usage in the workplace: A guide to effective human resource management. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Anandarajan, M., Simmers, C.A., (2005). Developinghuman capital through personal web use in the work-place: mapping employee perceptions, Communicationsof the Association for Information System, 15, 776-791.
  • Andel, S.A., Kessler, S.R., Pindek, S., Kleinman, G., Spector, P.E. (2019). Is cyberloafing more complex than we originally thought? Cyberloafing as a coping response to workplace aggression exposure, Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 124-130.
  • Arslan, E.T., Demir, H. (2016). Sanal Kaytarma: Bir Kamu Kurumunda Hemşireler Üzerinde Ampirik Bir Araştırma, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9 (43), 1626-1638.
  • Askew, K. L. (2012). The Relationship between Cyberloafing and Task Performance and An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Cyberloafing. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida College of Arts and Sciences, USA.
  • Askew, K., Buckner, J.E., Taing, M.U., Ilie, A., Bauer, J.A., Coovert, M.D. (2014). Explaining Cyberloafing: The Role of The Theory of Planned Behavior, Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510-519.
  • Babadağ, M. (2018). İşe Yabancılaşmanın Sanal Kaytarma Üzerindeki Etkisi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21 (39), 207-239.
  • Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel Araştırmalarda Örnekleme Yöntemleri ve Örnek Hacmi Sorunsalı Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7 (1), 231-274.
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel Araştırma Süreci: Nitel Bir Araştırma Nasıl Yapılır?, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5 (2), 368-388.
  • Baş, M. (2020). Sanal Kaytarma Davranışının Nedenleri ve Sonuçlarının İncelenmesi, International Marmara Social Sciences Congress (Imascon 2020 – Autumn) Proceedings Book, 381-390.
  • Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel Araştırmalarda Geçerlik, Güvenirlik ve Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Belirlenmesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9 (1), 23-28.
  • Belanger, F., Van Slyke, C. (2002). Abuse or learning?, Communications of the ACM, 45 (1), 64-65.
  • Blanchard, A.L., Henle, C.A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control, Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (3), 1067-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008
  • Blau, G., Yang, Y., Ward-Cook, K. (2006). Testing a Measure of Cyberloafing, Journal of Allied Health, 35 (1), 9-17.
  • Cihan, A. (2018). Sanal Kaytarma ve Algılanan Mesleki Etik Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Aksaray Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aksaray.
  • Çetin, C., Akyelli, N. (2020). Sanal Kaytarma ve İş Doyumu İlişkisi, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (1), 41-59.
  • Doorn, O. (2011, Ağustos). Cyberloafing: A Multi-Dimensional Construct Placed İn A Theoretical Framework. Master Thesis. Hollanda.
  • Dossey, L. (2014). FOMO, digital dementia, and our dangerous experiment. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 10(2): 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2013.12.008
  • Garrett, R. K., Danziger, J. N. (2008). On cyberslacking: Workplacestatus and personal internet use at work, CyberPsychology & Behavior,11 (3), 287-292.
  • Günel, Y., Güler, A. (2022). Çalışanların Kamu Kurumlarında Sanal Kaytarma Davranışına Yönelik Düşüncelerinin İncelenmesi. Journal of Academic Opinion, 2 (2), 54-66.
  • Gürbüz, F., Bayraklı, M., Gezgin, D.M. (2023). The effect of cyberloafing behaviors on smartphone addiction in university students: The mediating role of fear of missing out, Journal o f Educational Technology & Online Learning, 6 (1), 234-248.
  • Henle, C.A., Kohut, G., Booth, R. (2009). Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory, Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (4), 902-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.005
  • Jabeen, F., Tandon, A., Sithipolvanichgul, J., Srivastava, S., Dhir, A. (2023). Social media-induced fear of missing out (FoMO) and social media fatigue: The role of narcissism, comparison and disclosure, Journal of Business Research, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113693
  • Jia, H., Jia, R., & Karau, S. (2013). Cyberloafing and Personality: The Impact of the Big Five Traits and Workplace Situational Factors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 358-365. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1548051813488208
  • Karaca, A., Karaca, B. (2019). Sağlık Çalışanlarının Sanal Kaytarma Davranışları İle Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Bir Kamu Hastanesi Örneği, Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 18 (1), 27-39.
  • Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (1), 62-80.
  • Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F.G., Yılmaz, R., Sulak, S. (2023). Cyberloafing in the Online Synchronous Lessons: Exploring Variables Associated with University Students’ Cyberloafing Behaviors, Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09676-4
  • Koay, K.Y., Soh, P.C.H. (2018). Should cyberloafing be allowed in the workplace?, Human Resource Management International Digest, 26 (7), 4-6, DOI 10.1108/HRMID-05-2018-0107.
  • Lee, D.C., Lin, S.H., Ma, H.L., Wu, D.B. (2017). Use of a Modified UTAUT Model to Investigate the Perspectives of Internet Access Device Users, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33 (7), 549-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1261249
  • Li, S. M.,Chung, T. M. (2006). Internet function and ınternet addictive behavior, Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1067-1071.
  • Lim, V.K.G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (5), 675-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
  • Lim, V.K.G., Chen, D.J.Q. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work?, Behaviour & Information Technology, 31 (4), 343-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290903353054
  • Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. (2005). Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study, Information & Management, 42 (8), 1081-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002
  • Lim, V.K.G., Teo, T.S.H. (2024). Cyberloafing: A review and research agenda, Applied Psychology, 73 (1), 441-484. (First published: 22 November 2022).
  • Moody, G.D., Siponen, M. (2013). Using the theory of interpersonal behavior to explain non-work-related personal use of the Internet at work, Information & Management, 50, 322-335.
  • Morgan, D. L., Morgan, R. K. (2008). Single-Case Research Methods for the Behavioral and Health Sciences. SAGE Publications.
  • Örücü, E, Hasırcı, I. (2021). Organizasyonlarda Sinizm ile Sanal Kaytarma Davranışı İlişkisinde Çalışan Yaşının Düzenleyici Etkisi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 28 (1), 23-43.
  • Pindek, S., Krajcevska, A., Spector, P.E. (2018). Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom, Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 147-152.
  • Polzer-Debruyne, A. M. (2008). Psychological and Workplace Attributes that Influence Personal Web Use (PWU),YayınlanmamıĢ Doktora Tezi, Endüstiryel/Örgütsel Psikoloji, Massey Üniversitesi, New Zealand.
  • Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computer in Human Behaviours, 29(4), 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
  • Sheikh, A., Atashgah, M.S., Adibzadegan, M. (2015). The antecedents of cyberloafing: A case study in an Iranian copper industry, Computers in Human Behavior, 51 (A), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.042
  • Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L.M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68 (3), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005
  • Syed, S. Singh, H., Thangaraju, S.K., Bakri, N.E., Hwa, K.Y., a/l Kusalavan, P. (2020). The Impact of Cyberloafing on Employees’ Job Performance: A Review of Literature, Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 6, 16-28.
  • Şimşek, A, Şimşek, E. (2019). Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Cyberloafing in the Workplace, Journal of Organizational Behavior Review, 1 (1), 97-114.
  • Turan, G.B., Özer, Z., Atan, G. (2021). The relationship between cyberloafing levels and social media addiction among nursing students, Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57, 836-843.
  • TÜİK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu) (2023a). Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT) Kullanım Araştırması, 2023, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2023-49407#:~:text=Hanehalk%C4%B1%20bili%C5%9Fim%20teknolojileri%20kullan%C4%B1m%20ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmas%C4%B1,artarak%20%95%2C5%20oldu.&text=%C4%B0nternet%20kullan%C4%B1m%20oran%C4%B1%2C%2016%2D74,y%C4%B1l%C4%B1nda%20%87%2C1%20oldu. (Erişim Tarihi: 26.12.2023).
  • TÜİK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu) (2023b). Girişimlerde Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2023, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Girisimlerde-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2023-49393 (Erişim Tarihi: 26.12.2023).
  • Ugrin, J.C., Pearson, J.M. (2013). The effects of sanctions and stigmas on cyberloafing, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 812-820.
  • Vitak, J., Crouse, J., LaRose, R. (2011). Personal Internet Use at Work: Understanding Cyberslacking, Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (5), 1751-1759.
  • Weissenfeld,K., Abramova, O., Krasnova, H. (2019). Antecedents for Cyberloafing – A Literature Review, 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, February 24-27, 2019, Siegen, Germany.
  • Yağcı, M., Yüceler, A. (2016). Kavramsal boyutlarıyla sanal kaytarma, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2 (2), 531-540.
  • Yıldız, B., Yıldız, H. (2015). İş Yaşamındaki Sanal Kaytarma Davranışlarının Hukuki Yönden İncelenmesi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 1-17.

INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 174 - 186, 31.12.2023

Öz

Purpose- In this study, the concept of cyberloafing, which we encounter more frequently as the use of technology increases day by day, is examined. In this respect, the aim of the study is to determine which situations the participants see as cyberloafing behavior, to reveal what the reasons for cyberloafing are, and to find out whether they perceive it as cyberloafing if they show cyberloafing behavior.
Methodology- The research was structured within the framework of qualitative research and descriptive analysis. Interview technique was preferred in the research in order to obtain more detailed information from the participants about cyberloafing. The research was conducted with 21 participants.
Findings- According to the results of the research, it was revealed that all participants showed cyberloafing behavior. Participants agreed that the definition of cyberloafing behavior is a behavior that occurs “while at work”. The majority of participants define cyberloafing behavior as “spending time on the internet while at work”. Participants mostly exemplified cyberloafing behavior as surfing on the internet, surfing around on social media networks, and playing games on the computer/phone. The most common reasons that may lead employees to show cyberloafing behavior are social media usage habits, fear of missing the agenda, and fear of missing out on what the entourage is doing. Participants consider the disadvantages of cyberloafing behavior to be decreased job performance, postponement of responsibilities, and increased concentration problems.
Conclusion- When the study results are evaluated in general, organizations and managers can focus on reducing the negative aspects of cyberloafing behavior by providing information and training to employees about the use of the internet and technology for personal reasons. Considering the positive and negative consequences of cyberloafing behavior, it would be appropriate to develop organizational policies and strategies on this issue instead of completely eliminating cyberloafing in organizations.

Kaynakça

  • Aghaz, A., Sheikh, A. (2016). Cyberloafing and job burnout: An investigation in the knowledge-intensive sector, Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 51-60.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Al-Shuaibi, A. S. İ., Shamsudin, F.M., Subramaniam, C. (2013). Do Human Resource Management Practices Matter in Reducing Cyberloafing at Work: Evidence from Jordan, The 2013 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, The West East Institute, 37-47, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Anandarajan, M., Devine, P., & Simmers, C. (2004). A multidimensional scaling approach to personal web usage in the workplace. In M. Anandarajan & C. Simmers (Eds.), Personal web usage in the workplace: A guide to effective human resource management. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Anandarajan, M., Simmers, C.A., (2005). Developinghuman capital through personal web use in the work-place: mapping employee perceptions, Communicationsof the Association for Information System, 15, 776-791.
  • Andel, S.A., Kessler, S.R., Pindek, S., Kleinman, G., Spector, P.E. (2019). Is cyberloafing more complex than we originally thought? Cyberloafing as a coping response to workplace aggression exposure, Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 124-130.
  • Arslan, E.T., Demir, H. (2016). Sanal Kaytarma: Bir Kamu Kurumunda Hemşireler Üzerinde Ampirik Bir Araştırma, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9 (43), 1626-1638.
  • Askew, K. L. (2012). The Relationship between Cyberloafing and Task Performance and An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Cyberloafing. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida College of Arts and Sciences, USA.
  • Askew, K., Buckner, J.E., Taing, M.U., Ilie, A., Bauer, J.A., Coovert, M.D. (2014). Explaining Cyberloafing: The Role of The Theory of Planned Behavior, Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510-519.
  • Babadağ, M. (2018). İşe Yabancılaşmanın Sanal Kaytarma Üzerindeki Etkisi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21 (39), 207-239.
  • Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel Araştırmalarda Örnekleme Yöntemleri ve Örnek Hacmi Sorunsalı Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7 (1), 231-274.
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel Araştırma Süreci: Nitel Bir Araştırma Nasıl Yapılır?, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5 (2), 368-388.
  • Baş, M. (2020). Sanal Kaytarma Davranışının Nedenleri ve Sonuçlarının İncelenmesi, International Marmara Social Sciences Congress (Imascon 2020 – Autumn) Proceedings Book, 381-390.
  • Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel Araştırmalarda Geçerlik, Güvenirlik ve Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Belirlenmesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9 (1), 23-28.
  • Belanger, F., Van Slyke, C. (2002). Abuse or learning?, Communications of the ACM, 45 (1), 64-65.
  • Blanchard, A.L., Henle, C.A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control, Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (3), 1067-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008
  • Blau, G., Yang, Y., Ward-Cook, K. (2006). Testing a Measure of Cyberloafing, Journal of Allied Health, 35 (1), 9-17.
  • Cihan, A. (2018). Sanal Kaytarma ve Algılanan Mesleki Etik Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Aksaray Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aksaray.
  • Çetin, C., Akyelli, N. (2020). Sanal Kaytarma ve İş Doyumu İlişkisi, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (1), 41-59.
  • Doorn, O. (2011, Ağustos). Cyberloafing: A Multi-Dimensional Construct Placed İn A Theoretical Framework. Master Thesis. Hollanda.
  • Dossey, L. (2014). FOMO, digital dementia, and our dangerous experiment. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 10(2): 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2013.12.008
  • Garrett, R. K., Danziger, J. N. (2008). On cyberslacking: Workplacestatus and personal internet use at work, CyberPsychology & Behavior,11 (3), 287-292.
  • Günel, Y., Güler, A. (2022). Çalışanların Kamu Kurumlarında Sanal Kaytarma Davranışına Yönelik Düşüncelerinin İncelenmesi. Journal of Academic Opinion, 2 (2), 54-66.
  • Gürbüz, F., Bayraklı, M., Gezgin, D.M. (2023). The effect of cyberloafing behaviors on smartphone addiction in university students: The mediating role of fear of missing out, Journal o f Educational Technology & Online Learning, 6 (1), 234-248.
  • Henle, C.A., Kohut, G., Booth, R. (2009). Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory, Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (4), 902-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.005
  • Jabeen, F., Tandon, A., Sithipolvanichgul, J., Srivastava, S., Dhir, A. (2023). Social media-induced fear of missing out (FoMO) and social media fatigue: The role of narcissism, comparison and disclosure, Journal of Business Research, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113693
  • Jia, H., Jia, R., & Karau, S. (2013). Cyberloafing and Personality: The Impact of the Big Five Traits and Workplace Situational Factors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 358-365. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1548051813488208
  • Karaca, A., Karaca, B. (2019). Sağlık Çalışanlarının Sanal Kaytarma Davranışları İle Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Bir Kamu Hastanesi Örneği, Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 18 (1), 27-39.
  • Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (1), 62-80.
  • Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F.G., Yılmaz, R., Sulak, S. (2023). Cyberloafing in the Online Synchronous Lessons: Exploring Variables Associated with University Students’ Cyberloafing Behaviors, Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09676-4
  • Koay, K.Y., Soh, P.C.H. (2018). Should cyberloafing be allowed in the workplace?, Human Resource Management International Digest, 26 (7), 4-6, DOI 10.1108/HRMID-05-2018-0107.
  • Lee, D.C., Lin, S.H., Ma, H.L., Wu, D.B. (2017). Use of a Modified UTAUT Model to Investigate the Perspectives of Internet Access Device Users, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33 (7), 549-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1261249
  • Li, S. M.,Chung, T. M. (2006). Internet function and ınternet addictive behavior, Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1067-1071.
  • Lim, V.K.G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (5), 675-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
  • Lim, V.K.G., Chen, D.J.Q. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work?, Behaviour & Information Technology, 31 (4), 343-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290903353054
  • Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. (2005). Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study, Information & Management, 42 (8), 1081-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002
  • Lim, V.K.G., Teo, T.S.H. (2024). Cyberloafing: A review and research agenda, Applied Psychology, 73 (1), 441-484. (First published: 22 November 2022).
  • Moody, G.D., Siponen, M. (2013). Using the theory of interpersonal behavior to explain non-work-related personal use of the Internet at work, Information & Management, 50, 322-335.
  • Morgan, D. L., Morgan, R. K. (2008). Single-Case Research Methods for the Behavioral and Health Sciences. SAGE Publications.
  • Örücü, E, Hasırcı, I. (2021). Organizasyonlarda Sinizm ile Sanal Kaytarma Davranışı İlişkisinde Çalışan Yaşının Düzenleyici Etkisi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 28 (1), 23-43.
  • Pindek, S., Krajcevska, A., Spector, P.E. (2018). Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom, Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 147-152.
  • Polzer-Debruyne, A. M. (2008). Psychological and Workplace Attributes that Influence Personal Web Use (PWU),YayınlanmamıĢ Doktora Tezi, Endüstiryel/Örgütsel Psikoloji, Massey Üniversitesi, New Zealand.
  • Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computer in Human Behaviours, 29(4), 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
  • Sheikh, A., Atashgah, M.S., Adibzadegan, M. (2015). The antecedents of cyberloafing: A case study in an Iranian copper industry, Computers in Human Behavior, 51 (A), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.042
  • Spector, P.E., Fox, S., Penney, L.M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68 (3), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005
  • Syed, S. Singh, H., Thangaraju, S.K., Bakri, N.E., Hwa, K.Y., a/l Kusalavan, P. (2020). The Impact of Cyberloafing on Employees’ Job Performance: A Review of Literature, Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 6, 16-28.
  • Şimşek, A, Şimşek, E. (2019). Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Cyberloafing in the Workplace, Journal of Organizational Behavior Review, 1 (1), 97-114.
  • Turan, G.B., Özer, Z., Atan, G. (2021). The relationship between cyberloafing levels and social media addiction among nursing students, Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57, 836-843.
  • TÜİK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu) (2023a). Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT) Kullanım Araştırması, 2023, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2023-49407#:~:text=Hanehalk%C4%B1%20bili%C5%9Fim%20teknolojileri%20kullan%C4%B1m%20ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmas%C4%B1,artarak%20%95%2C5%20oldu.&text=%C4%B0nternet%20kullan%C4%B1m%20oran%C4%B1%2C%2016%2D74,y%C4%B1l%C4%B1nda%20%87%2C1%20oldu. (Erişim Tarihi: 26.12.2023).
  • TÜİK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu) (2023b). Girişimlerde Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2023, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Girisimlerde-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2023-49393 (Erişim Tarihi: 26.12.2023).
  • Ugrin, J.C., Pearson, J.M. (2013). The effects of sanctions and stigmas on cyberloafing, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 812-820.
  • Vitak, J., Crouse, J., LaRose, R. (2011). Personal Internet Use at Work: Understanding Cyberslacking, Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (5), 1751-1759.
  • Weissenfeld,K., Abramova, O., Krasnova, H. (2019). Antecedents for Cyberloafing – A Literature Review, 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, February 24-27, 2019, Siegen, Germany.
  • Yağcı, M., Yüceler, A. (2016). Kavramsal boyutlarıyla sanal kaytarma, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2 (2), 531-540.
  • Yıldız, B., Yıldız, H. (2015). İş Yaşamındaki Sanal Kaytarma Davranışlarının Hukuki Yönden İncelenmesi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 1-17.
Toplam 55 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Nihan Yavuz Aksakal 0000-0002-1603-2520

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 5 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi 27 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Yavuz Aksakal, N. (2023). INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. Research Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 174-186.
AMA Yavuz Aksakal N. INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. RJBM. Aralık 2023;10(4):174-186.
Chicago Yavuz Aksakal, Nihan. “INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”. Research Journal of Business and Management 10, sy. 4 (Aralık 2023): 174-86.
EndNote Yavuz Aksakal N (01 Aralık 2023) INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. Research Journal of Business and Management 10 4 174–186.
IEEE N. Yavuz Aksakal, “INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”, RJBM, c. 10, sy. 4, ss. 174–186, 2023.
ISNAD Yavuz Aksakal, Nihan. “INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”. Research Journal of Business and Management 10/4 (Aralık 2023), 174-186.
JAMA Yavuz Aksakal N. INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. RJBM. 2023;10:174–186.
MLA Yavuz Aksakal, Nihan. “INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”. Research Journal of Business and Management, c. 10, sy. 4, 2023, ss. 174-86.
Vancouver Yavuz Aksakal N. INVESTIGATION OF CYBERLOAFING BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF VARIOUS ELEMENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. RJBM. 2023;10(4):174-86.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.