Determination of Nursing Students' Levels of Knowledge in Sexual Health/Reproductive Health during Emergency Status and Influencing Factors

Abstract

Objective: The aim is to determine nursing students' sexual/reproductive health knowledge levels and affecting factors in extraordinary situations. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out with 356 nursing students between November-December 2023 at Bartın University of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. Data were collected through a survey including the Introductory Information Form and the Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge Scale in Emergencies (SRHKSE). Results: The mean age of nursing students was 20.53±2.57. The average score on the SRHKSE was 84.90±7.91. The sub-dimensions of the SRHKSE revealed the following average scores: women's health empowerment 46.17±4.72, material supply for implementing the minimum initial service package in emergencies 17.79±2.42, basic knowledge of the minimum initial service package in emergencies 10.07±1.27, and strategy and education for the minimum initial service package in emergencies 10.87±1.72. Nursing students who were female, in their 3rd year, had income exceeding expenses, had mothers with primary/secondary education, and had knowledge in reproductive and sexual health showed significantly higher SRHKSE scores (p<.001). Conclusion: In our study, nursing students exhibited high levels of knowledge in sexual and reproductive health during emergency status. The levels of knowledge in sexual and reproductive health during emergency status were found to be affected by gender, academic year, income level, maternal education, and awareness of reproductive and sexual health. It is recommended to conduct different research on the subject and develop the literature.

Keywords

• Nursing
• Student
• Emergency Status
• Sexual/Reproductive Health
• Knowledge

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the Bartın University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee to conduct the research (Protocol Number: 2023-SBB-0666, Meeting Date: 16.11.2023). Institutional permission was received from the institution where the research was conducted. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study. Throughout the research process, adherence to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and Publication Ethics was maintained.

References

1. Koç Akgül S. Olağanüstü durumlar, iletişim ve habercilik yaklaşımları. TRT Akademi. 2017;2(3):6-47.
2. Askew I, Khosla R, Daniels U, Krause S, Lofthouse C, Say L, et al. Sexual and reproductive health and rights in emergencies. Bull. World Health Organ. 2016;94(5):311. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.173567
3. Canbulat Ş. Doğal afetler ve olağanüstü durumlarda görülen salgın hastalıklar. Tarsus Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;3(1):47-64.
4. Singh NS, Smith J, Aryasinghe S, Khosla R, Say L, Blanchet K. Evaluating the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health services during humanitarian crises: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2018;3(7):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199300
5. Krause SK, Chynoweth SK, Tanabe M. Sea-change in reproductive health in emergencies: How systemic improvements to address the MISP were achieved. SRHM. 2017;25(51):7–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1401894
6. Stephens JH, Lassa JA. Sexual and reproductive health during disasters: A scoping review of the evidence. IJDRR. 2020;50:101733.
7. Inter Agency Working Group. Chapter 3: Minimum initial service package (MISP), 2018. https://iawgfieldmanual.com/manual/misp#introduction Accessed Date: 5 December 2023.
8. Beek K, Drysdale R, Kusen M, Dawson A. Preparing for and responding to sexual and reproductive health in disaster settings: evidence from Fiji and Tonga. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01236-2

9. Roxo U, Linda Mobula M, Walker D, Fincht A, Yeiser S. Prioritizing the sexual and reproductive health and rights of adolescent girls and young women within HIV treatment and care services in emergency settings: A girl-centered agenda. Reprod Health. 2019;16(Suppl 1): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0710-0
10. Singh NS, Smith J, Aryasinghe S, Khosla R, Say L, Blanchet K. Evaluating the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health services during humanitarian crises: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0199300. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199300
11. Cirban Ekrem E. Afetlerde cinsel sağlık/üreme sağlığı ve hemşirelik yaklaşımı. İçinde: Gülcan D, editör. Sağlık & Bilim: Hemşirelik. İstanbul: Efe Akademi Yayınları; 2021. p. 115-124.
12. Cirban Ekrem E, Kurt A. Developing the sexual and reproductive health knowledge scale in emergencies. EJOG. 2023;289:177-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.392
13. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97–107, https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
14. Champion JD, Harlin B, Collins JL. Sexual risk behavior and STI health literacy among ethnic minority adolescent women. Appl Nurs Res. 2013;26:204–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2013.06.003. pmid:23867137
15. Hailegebreal S, Gilano G, Seboka BT., Sidelil H, Awol SM, Haile Y, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of early sexual initiation among female youth in East Africa: Further analysis of recent demographic and health survey. BMC Women's Health. 2022;22(1):1-9.
16. Vongxay V, Albers F, Thongmixay S, Thongsombath M, Broerse JEW, Sychareun V, et al. Sexual and reproductive health literacy of school adolescents in Lao PDR. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0209675.
17. Rajabi E, Khankeh H, Ranjbar M, Mousavi M, Norouzi M, Farokhi M. Evaluation of women’s reproductive health status after the 2017 earthquake in Kermanshah, Iran. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly. 2022;7(4):183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/hdq.7.4.271.2
18. Seid K, Kebede T, Dessalegn N, Ejara Y, Moga F, Daniel M, et al. Nursing students’ attitudes and beliefs regarding sexual healthcare in Ethiopia: An online cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0278760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278760
19. Senturk Erenel A, Cicek Ozdemir S. Attitude and behaviors of senior nursing students in assessment of sexual health. Sex Disabil. 2020;38:503–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-020-09642-3
20. Koçoğlu F, Kocaöz S, Kara P. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin üreme sağlığı tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Ordu Univercity J Nurs Stud. 2022;5(3):355-364. https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.932843
21. Karakurt P, Köse Tuncer S. Üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsel sağlığa yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi: Hemşirelik öğrencileri örneği. Gevher Nesibe Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022;7(20):131-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.713359
22. Dişsiz M, Akkurt Yalçıntürk A, Sümer G, Tavşan C, Dede S, Durmuş Ş, et al. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin cinsel sağlık konusundaki bilgi düzeyleri ve görüşleri. Zeynep Kâmil Med J. 2020;51(2):78-83. https://doi.org/10.16948/zktipb.691007
23. Üstgörül S, Önür H, Tekin Önür H. Üniversite öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet algıları ile cinsel tutumlarının incelenmesi. Al Farabi-Injosos. 2020;5(3):77-87.
24. Omar NA, Nazri MA, Ali MH, Alam SS. The panic buying behavior of consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the influences of uncertainty, perceptions of severity, perceptions of scarcity, and anxiety. J Retail Consum Serv. 2021;62:102600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102600
25. Cirban Ekrem E, Kuş T, Erkmen E, Dursun N. The investigation of the impact of education on sexual health/reproductive health knowledge levels of nurses and midwives in extraordinary situations ‒ Evidence from Turkey. Eur J Clin Exp Med. 2023;21(4):802-811. https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2023.4.22
26. Evcili F, Golbasi Z. Sexual myths and sexual health knowledge levels of Turkish university students. Sex Cult. 2017;21:976–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9436-8