sdü tıp fak derg

Medical Journal of Süleyman Demirel University

2602-2109

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi

10.17343/sdutfd.1344186

Restorative Dentistry

Restoratif Diş Tedavisi

FARKLI CAM İYONOMER SİMANLARIN RENK STABİLİTELERİ VE MİKROSERTLİKLERİ

COLOR STABILITY AND MICROHARDNESS OF DIFFERENT GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8100-9805

Temel

Uğur Burak

SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-8839

Kam Hepdeniz

Özge

SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ

09 23 2023

30 3 500 507 08 16 2023 08 23 2023

1994

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

AmaçCam iyonomer simanlar sahip oldukları olumlu özelliklerdendolayı diş hekimliğinde birçok farklı tedavi prosedüründetercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı,farklı cam iyonomerlerin, farklı solüsyonlarda bekletildiktensonraki renk farkı ve mikrosertlik sonuçlarınıdeğerlendirmektir.Gereç ve YöntemEquia Forte, AHfil Silver ve Ionofil cam iyonomerlerinher birinden 40 tane olmak üzere toplam 120 örnekhazırlandı. Her cam iyonomere ait örnekler distile su,kola, çay ve kahve solüsyonlarında bekletildi. Solüsyonlaradaldırılmadan önce ve bir hafta sonra örneklerinrenk ve mikrosertlik ölçümleri yapıldı. Örneklerinrenk ölçümleri bir spektrofotometre ile, mikrosertlik değerleriise Vickers mikrosertlik cihazı ile değerlendirildi.Renk analizi için, solüsyonlara daldırılmadan önceve bir hafta sonra örneklerin L*, a* ve b* değerleri eldeedilerek renk değişimleri (ΔE) hesaplandı. Elde edilenveriler varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey’s testi ile değerlendirildi.BulgularAHfil Silver için kolada bekleyen örnekler dışında, tümmateryaller için tüm sıvılarda bekletilen örneklerdemikrosertlik değerlerinde bir artış gözlendi. En yüksekrenk değişimi Equia Forte için kahvede, AHfil Silverve Ionofil için kolada bekletilen örneklerde elde edildi(p

ObjectiveGlass ionomers are preferred in many differenttreatment procedures in dentistry due to their positivefeatures. The aim of this study is to evaluate thecolor difference and microhardness values of variousglass ionomer cement after storing them in differentsolutions.Material and MethodA total of 120 samples were prepared, including 40 ofeach of the Equia Forte, AHfil Silver, and Ionofil glassionomers. Each glass ionomer sample was stored indistilled water, cola, tea, and coffee solutions. Colorand microhardness measurements of the specimenswere performed before and after a week before it wasimmersed in solutions. The color measurements of thesamples were evaluated with a spectrophotometer andmicrohardness values were evaluated with Vickersmicrohardness device. For color analysis, colorchanges (ΔE) were calculated by obtaining the valuesof L*, a*, and b* of the samples before and after a weekafter being immersed in solutions. The data obtainedwere evaluated by variance analysis (ANOVA) andTukey’s test.ResultsExcept for specimens stored in cola for AHfil Silver,microhardness values were increased for all materialsimmersed in test solutions. The highest color changewas obtained in coffee for Equia Forte, in the samplesimmersed in cola for AHfil Silver and Ionophil (p

color stability microhardness glass ionomer cement

renk stabilitesi mikrosertlik cam iyonomer siman

1. Sharafeddin F, Azar MR, Feizi N, Salehi R. Evaluation of Surface Microhardness of Silver and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-ionomers with and without Microhydroxyapatite. J Dent Biomater, 2017;4(4):454- 460.

2. Čulina MZ, Rajić VB, Šalinović I, Klarić E, Marković L, Ivanišević A. Influence of pH Cycling on Erosive Wear and Color Stability of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cements. Materials. 2022; 15(3):923.

3. Nicholson JW, Sidhu SK, Czarnecka B. Enhancing the Mechanical Properties of Glass-Ionomer Dental Cements: A Review. Materials. 2020 May 31;13(11):2510.

4. Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-Based restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(6):824- 832.

5. Buldur M, Sirin Karaarslan E. Microhardness of glass carbomer and high-viscous glass Ionomer cement in different thickness and thermo-light curing durations after thermocycling aging. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):273.

6. Tamilselvam S, Divyanand MJ, Neelakantan P. Biocompatibility of a conventional glass ionomer, ceramic reinforced glass ionomer, giomer and resin composite to fibroblasts: in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;37(4):403-406.

7. Karakaş SN, Küden C. AFM and SEM/EDS characterization of surfaces of fluorine-releasing bulk-fill restorative materials aged in common liquids. J Oral Sci. 2022;64(3):202-207.

8. Poornima P, Koley P, Kenchappa M, Nagaveni NB, Bharath KP, Neena IE. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and surface microhardness of EQUIA Forte, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with conventional glass-ionomer cement. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(3):265-270.

9. Yap AU, Ong JE, Yahya NA. Effect of resin coating on highly viscous glass ionomer cements: A dynamic analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;113:104120.

10. Fleming GJ, Kenny SM, Barralet JE. The optimisation of the initial viscosity of an encapsulated glass-ionomer restorative following different mechanical mixing regimes. J Dent. 2006;34(2):155-163.

11. Yap AU, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):1-8.

12. Dowling AH, Fleming GJ. Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents? J Dent. 2009;37(2):133-140.

13. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Failure rate of high-viscosity GIC based ART compared with that of conventional amalgam restorations--evidence from an update of a systematic review. SADJ. 2012;67(7):329-331.

14. Ozkanoglu S, G Akin EG. Evaluation of the effect of various beverages on the color stability and microhardness of restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(3):322-328.

15. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1994;10(6):353-362.

16. Sánchez GA, Fernandez De Preliasco MV. Salivary pH changes during soft drinks consumption in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13(4):251-257.

17. Johansson AK, Lingström P, Imfeld T, Birkhed D. Influence of drinking method on tooth-surface pH in relation to dental erosion. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112(6):484-489.

18. Mueninghoff LA, Johnson MH. Erosion: a case caused by unusual diet. J Am Dent Assoc. 1982;104(1):51-52.

19. Jyothi K, Crasta S, Venugopal P. Effect of five commercial mouth rinses on the microhardness of a nanofilled resin composite restorative material: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2012;15(3):214-217.

20. de Moraes RR, Marimon JL, Schneider LF, Sinhoreti MA, Correr- Sobrinho L, Bueno M. Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(4):323-326.

21. Yap AU, Tan SH, Wee SS, Lee CW, Lim EL, Zeng KY. Chemical degradation of composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(11):1015-1021.

22. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(2):124-131.

23. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater. 2004;20(6):530-534.

24. Erdrich A. Discoloration face‐off: fine‐hybrid composites versus nanofilled. Dental Products Report Europe. 2004:8‐11.

25. Yanikoğlu N, Duymuş ZY, Yilmaz B. Effects of different solutions on the surface hardness of composite resin materials. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(3):344-351.

26. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM. Effects of sports drinks on color stability of nanofilled and microhybrid composites after longterm immersion. J Dent. 2012;40 Suppl 2:e55-e63.

27. Bezgin T, Özer L, Tulga Öz F, Özkan P. Effect of toothbrushing on color changes of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S65-S73.

28. Schulze KA, Marshall SJ, Gansky SA, Marshall GW. Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater. 2003;19(7):612-619.

29. Fay RM, Servos T, Powers JM. Color of restorative materials after staining and bleaching. Oper Dent. 1999;24(5):292-296.

30. Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43(5):542-545.

31. Hayacibara MF, Ambrozano GM, Cury JA. Simultaneous release of fluoride and aluminum from dental materials in various immersion media. Oper Dent. 2004;29(1):16-22.

32. Tan BL, Yap AUJ, Ma HNT, Chew J, Tan WJ. Effect of beverages on color and translucency of new tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):E56-E65.

33. Barutcigil Ç, Yıldız M. Intrinsic and extrinsic discoloration of dimethacrylate and silorane based composites. J Dent. 2012;40 Suppl 1:e57-e63.

34. Mundim FM, Garcia L da FR, Pires-de-Souza F de CP. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(3):249-254.

35. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005;33(5):389-398.

36. Al-Taee L, Deb S, Banerjee A. An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements. BDJ Open. 2020;6:12.

37. Cattani-Lorente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water. Dent Mater. 1994;10(1):37-44.

38. Williams, J. A. & Billington, R. W. Changes in compressive strength of glass ionomer restorative materials with respect to time periods of 24 h to 4 months. J. Oral. Rehabil. 18, 163–168 (1991).

39. Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 2001;29(3):205-210.

40. De Moor RJ, Verbeeck RM. Effect of acetic acid on the fluoride release profiles of restorative glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1998;14(4):261-268.