<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>sdü tıp fak derg</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Medical Journal of Süleyman Demirel University</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2602-2109</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17343/sdutfd.598845</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Surgery</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Cerrahi</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>MEME KANSERİ BİYOPSİ ve REZEKSİYON MATERYALLERİNDE HORMON RESEPTÖRLERİ (ER/PgR) ve HER2 DEĞERLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5321-2002</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Devrim</surname>
                                    <given-names>Tuba</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Aydemir</surname>
                                    <given-names>Merva</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20200601">
                    <day>06</day>
                    <month>01</month>
                    <year>2020</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>27</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>154</fpage>
                                        <lpage>159</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20190730">
                        <day>07</day>
                        <month>30</month>
                        <year>2019</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20190822">
                        <day>08</day>
                        <month>22</month>
                        <year>2019</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1994, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1994</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Amaç:Meme kanseri tanısı almış olgularda, biyopsive rezeksiyon materyalleri arasındaki uyumun değerlendirilmesi ve tümör alttipleri, östrojen reseptörü (ER),progesteron reseptörü (PgR) ve HER2 düzeylerine göre patolojikdurumlarının karşılaştırılması ve sonuçların literatür eşliğinde irdelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp FakültesiTıbbi Patoloji Ana Bilim Dalı’nda Ocak 2013 ve Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasındamalign tanı almış, meme biyopsi ve rezeksiyon materyalleri bulunan hastalaraait patoloji raporları incelendi. Her iki materyali de bölümümüzde bulunan 14 olgunun, hemotoksilen-eozin veimmünhistokimyasal ER, PgR ve HER2 preparatları arşivden çıkarılarak tekrardeğerlendirildi. Sonuçlar arasındaki tutarlılıklar hesaplandı.Bulgular:Meme karsinomu tanısı alan olgularınbiyopsi ve rezeksiyon materyalleri arasındaki tümör derece uyumu % 78,5 olarak saptandı. Her iki materyal arasındaskor tutarlılıkları ER ile % 100, PgR ile %92,8, HER2 % 78,5 olarak belirlendi. Moleküler alt tiplerdekiuyum ise % 88,9 olarak saptandı. Sonuç: Çalışmamız kapsamındaki meme karsinomu vakalarınaait biyopsi ve rezeksiyon materyalleri arasında; tümör derecesi, ER/PgRekspresyonu, HER2 skorları ve moleküler alt tipler bakımından yüksekoranda tutarlılık saptandı. Söz konusu yüksek tutarlılık oranına rağmen,tümörün tamamını temsil etme özelliğine sahip rezeksiyon materyallerinin, tedavi ve prognozda önemli bilgiler veren ER/PgRve HER2 skorları bakımından değerlendirmelerinin hasta yönetimindeki başarıyı arttıracağı sonucuna varılmıştır.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>meme</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  karsinom</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  biyopsi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  rezeksiyon</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  östrojen reseptörü</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  progesteron reseptörü</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  HER2</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">1.	Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the World. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2019;11:151-164.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">2.	Ferley J, SoerjomataramI I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">3.	Lakhani, S.R., Ellis. I.O., Schnitt, S.J., Tan, P.H., van de Vijver, M.J. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. 4th Edition. WHO Classification of Tumours, No 4. IARC. ISBN-13 9789283224334. 2012</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">4.	Hortobagyi GN, de la Garza Salazar J, Pritchard K, et al. ABREAST Investigators The global breast cancer burden: variations in epidemiology and survival. Clin Breast Cancer 2005;6(5):391-401.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">5.	Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, et al. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2019 with focus on breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019;30(5):781-787.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">6.	Davidson TM, Rendi MH, Frederick PD, Onega T, Allison KH, Mercan E, Brunyé TT, Shapiro LG, Weaver DL, Elmore JG. Breast cancer prognostic factors in the digital era: comparison of nottingham grade using whole slide ımages and glass slides. J Pathol Inform. 2019,3;10:11.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">7.	Tang P., Bui M.M., Peng Y. Immunohistochemistry in Breast Cancer. Practical Breast Pathology. Practical Anatomic Pathology. First ed. Springer, Cham,173-192, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">8.	Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: Highlights of the st gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2206-23.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">9.	Gulzar R, Shahid R, Saleem O. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer by immunohistochemical profiling. Int J Pathol 2018;16(2):129-134.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">10.	Wunderle M,   Pretscher J,  Brucker SY,  et al. Association between breast cancer risk factors and molecular type in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;174:453-61</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">11.	Puig-Vives M, Sánchez MJ, Sánchez-Cantalejo J. et al. Distribution and prognosis of molecular breast cancer subtypes defined by immunohistochemical biomarkers in a Spanish population-based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(3):609-14.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">12.	Brown M1, Tsodikov A, Bauer KR, Parise CA, Caggiano V. The role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in the survival of women with estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative, invasive breast cancer: the California Cancer Registry, 1999-2004. Cancer. 2008;112(4):737-47.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">13.	Ateş C, Öztuna D, Genç Y. Sağlık araştırmalarında sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısının kullanımı. Turkiye Klinikleri J Biostat 2009;1(2):59-64.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">14.	Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68(6):394-424.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">15.	Alkabban FM, Ferguson T. Cancer, Breast. StatPearls Publishing Treasure Island (FL). 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">16.	Yersal O, Barutca S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5: 412-424.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">17.	Kunc M, Biernat W, Senkus-Konefka E. Estrogen receptor-negative progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer-&quot;Nobody&#039;s land&quot; or just an artifact? Cancer Treat Rev 2018;67:78-87.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">18.	Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):e48-72.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">19.	Liedtke C1, Broglio K, Moulder S, et al. Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009;20(12):1953-8.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">20.	Zhu S, Wu J, Huang O, He J, Zhu L, Li Y, Chen W, Fei X, Chen X, Shen K. Clinicopathological features and disease outcome in breast cancer patients with hormonal receptor discordance between core needle biopsy and following surgical sample. Ann Surg Oncol 2019 doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07480-y.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">21.	Mitri Z, Constantine T, O&#039;Regan R. The HER2 receptor in breast cancer: pathophysiology, clinical use, and new advances in therapy. Chemother Res Pract 2012;2012:743193.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">22.	Kondov B, Milenkovikj Z, Kondov G, et al. Presentation of the molecular subtypes of breast cancer detected by ımmunohistochemistry in surgically treated patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(6):961-967.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">23.	Onitilo AA, Engel JM, Greenlee RT, Mukesh BN. Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival. Clin Med Res 2009;7(1-2):4-13.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
