Numerical investigation of free rotor aerodynamics

Year 2024, Volume: 42 Issue: 6, 1826 - 1837, 09.12.2024

Sarih Sarı , Ali Doğrul , Seyfettin Bayraktar

Abstract

Rotor aerodynamics is important for rotarywing aircraft especially those located in naval surface combatants. The aerodynamic interaction between the helicopter, its rotor and the ship structure should be investigated precisely. This study focuses on the aerodynamic perfor-mance of four-blade rotor geometry of Sikorsky S-76 helicopter. The main rotor geometry was analyzed numerically in the free condition in an unbounded flow domain. Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations in rigid body motion (RBM) on unstruc-tured grids were solved by discretizing the computational domain with finite volume elements and using the Shear-Stress Transport (SST) k-ω turbulence model. The numerical approach was verified using the GCI method and validated with the relevant data available in the literature. It was found that in hover condition, non-dimensional thrust and the torque coefficients change slightly with the rotation speed of the rotor due to possibly the collective pitch angle. However, whereas the torque coefficient varies slightly with rotor speed, the thrust coefficient fluctuates substantially.

Keywords

Aerodynamics, Free Rotor, GCI, Hover, URANS

References

• REFERENCES
• [1] Matías JC, Bardera R, Franchini S, Barroso E, Sor S. A comparative analysis of helicopter recovery maneuvers on a SFS by means of PIV and balance measurements. Ocean Eng 2023;275:114119. [CrossRef]
• [2] Jain R. Hover Predictions on the S-76 rotor with tip shape variation using helios. J Aircr 2018;55:66–77. [CrossRef]
• [3] Wakefield NH, Newman SJ, Wilson PA. Helicopter flight around a ship’s superstructure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2002;216:13–28. [CrossRef]
• [4] Lee RG, Zan SJ. Wind Tunnel Testing of a Helicopter Fuselage and Rotor in a Ship Airwake. J Am Helicopter Soc 2005;50:326–337. [CrossRef]
• [5] Gregorio FD, Pengel K, Kindler K. Industrial measurement campaign on fully equipped helicopter model. 15th Symposium on the Applications of Laser Techniques t Fluid Mechanics, 2010-07-05 -
• 2010-07-08, Lisbon, Portugal: 2010.
• [6] Barakos GN, Crozon C, Steijl R. Numerical Study of Shipborne Rotors, Tianjin, China: 2013, p. 1–28.
• [7] Crozon C, Steijl R, Barakos GN. Numerical Study of Helicopter Rotors in a Ship Airwake. J Aircr 2014;51:1813–1832. [CrossRef]
• [8] Jain RK, Potsdam MA. Hover Predictions on the Sikorsky S-76 Rotor using Helios. 52nd Aerosp. Sci. Meet., National Harbor, Maryland: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2014. [CrossRef]
• [9] Orbay E. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Ship Airwake with a Hovering Helicopter Rotor. Master Thesis. METU, 2016.
• [10] Perera G, Jagathsinghe HDH, Dilshan SKK, Sudaraka MAM, Rangajeeva SLMD. Helicopter Main Rotor aerodynamic simulation with CFD. 9th Int. Res. Conf., Sri Lanka: 2016.
• [11] Shi Y, Xu Y, Zong K, Xu G. An investigation of coupling ship/rotor flowfield using steady and unsteady rotor methods. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2017;11:417–434. [CrossRef]
• [12] Şahbaz M, Sezer-Uzol N, Kurtuluş DF. Computational Analysis of A Model Scale Model Helicopter Rotor in Ground Effect. 9th Ank. Int. Aerosp. Conf., METU, Ankara, Türkiye: 2017.
• [13] Abras JN, Hariharan N. Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics Hover Predictions on the S-76 Rotor. J Aircr 2018;55:12–22. [CrossRef]
• [14] Tan JF, Zhou TY, Sun YM, Barakos GN. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic interaction between a tiltrotor and a tandem rotor during shipboard operations. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019;87:62– 72. [CrossRef]
• [15] Kara K, Brazell MJ, Kirby AC, Mavriplis DJ, Duque EP. Hover Predictions Using a High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Off-Body Discretization. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2020. [CrossRef]
• [16] Barakos GN, Fitzgibbon T, Kusyumov AN, Kusyumov SA, Mikhailov SA. CFD simulation of helicopter rotor flow based on unsteady actuator disk model. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33:2313–2328. [CrossRef]
• [17] Bardera R, Matias-Garcia JC, Garcia-Magariño A. PIV helicopter rotor-ground and rotor-frigate interaction study, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2020. [CrossRef]
• [18] İbaçoğlu H, Arikoğlu A. Multidisciplinary Conceptual Design Methodology and Design Tool for Rotor Blades of Advanced Helicopters. J Aeronaut Space Technol 2022;15:19–33.
• [19] Georgia Institute of Technology, Ashok S, Rauleder J. NATO Generic Destroyer Moving-Ship Airwake Validation and Rotor-Ship Dynamic Interface Computations using Immersed Boundary Lattice-Boltzmann Method. Proc. Vert. Flight Soc. 79th Annu. Forum, West Palm Beach, Florida USA: The Vertical Flight Society. p. 1–21, 2023. [CrossRef]
• [20] Fernandez N, Owen I, White M, National Research Council Canada, Wall A, et al. Helicopter Aerodynamic Loading in the Airwake of a Moving Ship. Proc. Vert. Flight Soc. 79th Annu. Forum, West Palm Beach, Florida USA: The Vertical Flight Society; p. 1–11, 2023. [CrossRef]
• [21] Yu P, Hu Z, Hu J, Xu G, Shi Y. Numerical studies on the aeroelasticity of a shipboard helicopter rotor during engagement and disengagement with ship motions using CFD/CSD coupling approach. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;141:108559. [CrossRef]
• [22] Zamiri A, Chung JT. Numerical evaluation of wind direction effects on the turbulence aerodynamics of a ship airwake. Ocean Eng 2023;284:115104. [CrossRef]
• [23] Jepson D, Moffitt R, Hilzinger K, Bissell J. Analysis and Correlation of Test Data From an Advanced Technology Rotor System. USA: 1983.
• [24] White F. Fluid Mechanics. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2015. [25] Cengel Y, Cimbala J. Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2017.
• [26] Wilcox DC. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. 3rd edition. La Cãnada, California, USA: DCW Industries; 2006.
• [27] Wilcox DC. Formulation of the k-w Turbulence Model Revisited. AIAA J 2008;46:2823–2838. [CrossRef]
• [28] Dogrul A. Numerical Prediction of Scale Effects on The Propulsion Performance of JOUBERT BB2 Submarine. Brodogr Teor Praksa Brodogr Pomor Teh 2022;73:17–42.
• [29] Sezen S, Delen C, Dogrul A, Atlar M. An investigation of scale effects on the self-propulsion characteristics of a submarine. Appl Ocean Res 2021;113:102728. [CrossRef]
• [30] Richardson LF. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser Contain Pap Math Phys Character 1911;210:307–357. [CrossRef]
• [31] Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Raad PE. Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications. J Fluids Eng 2008;130:078001. [CrossRef]
• [32] Praveen B, Vijayakumar R, Singh SN, Seshadri V. Flow characteristics on helodeck of a generic frigate ship model through experiment and CFD. Ocean Eng 2022;250:110912. [CrossRef]
• [33] Sarı S, Doğrul A, Bayraktar S. On The Computational Aerodynamics of a Generic Frigate, Istanbul, Türkiye: 2021, p. 397–403.
• [34] Cosner R, Oberkampf B, Rumsey C, Rahaim C, Shih T. AIAA Committee on Standards for Computational Fluid Dynamics: Status and Plans. 44th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., Reno, Nevada, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2006. [CrossRef]
• [35] Xing T, Stern F. Factors of Safety for Richardson Extrapolation. J Fluids Eng 2010;132:061403. [CrossRef]
• [36] Bilir AÇ, Doğrul A, Vardar N. An Extensive Investigation of Flow Conditioners Inside A Fi-Fi Monitor. Brodogr Teor Praksa Brodogr Pomor Teh 2022;73:161–177. [CrossRef]
• [37] Epps B. Review of Vortex Identification Methods. 55th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet., Grapevine, Texas, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2017. [CrossRef]
• [38] Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P. Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Cent. Turbul. Res. Proc. Summer Program, p. 193–208, 1988.
• [39] Kolář V. Vortex identification: New requirements and limitations. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2007;28:638–652. [CrossRef]