EKEV Akademi Dergisi 1301-6229 2148-0710 Erzurum Kültür Eğitim Vakfı 10.17753/sosekev.1574302 Development of Physical Education and Education Programs Beden Eğitimi ve Eğitim Programlarının Geliştirilmesi Experıence of Pıckleball Branch in E-Learnıng Envıronment in Sport SPORDA E-ÖĞRENME ORTAMINDA PİCKLEBALL BRANŞININ DENEYİMLENMESİ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-2188 Mutlu Bozkurt Tuğba BITLIS EREN UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS, DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2443-0123 Sezer Bengü https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6450-7326 Özkan Mine 03 24 2025 101 329 339 10 26 2024 02 06 2025 Copyright © 2013, EKEV Akademi Dergisi 2013 EKEV Akademi Dergisi

This study aims to reveal the reflection of primary school students' attitude towards e-learning in sports in the e-learning environment in the real environment of experiencing the Pickleball branch in the virtual environment. The study group of the research consists of a total of 362 volunteer students, 180 girls (%49.7) and 182 boys (%50.3), who are between the ages of 7-11 and continuing their education at Şehit Ender Alper Primary School, affiliated to the Ministry of National Education in Ankara. In the study, a quasi-experimental design with pre-test post-test control group from qualitative research models was used. ‘Personal Information Form’, ‘Pickleball Branch Learning Cascade’ and ‘Attitude Scale towards E-learning in Sport’ were used as data collection tools. The data were analysed using SPSS statistical software. The demographic information of the research group and the answers given to the attitude scale towards e-learning in sport were summarised with the help of descriptive statistics such as percentage (%), frequency (f), arithmetic mean (x̅) and standard deviation (sd). In addition, a Paired Sample T-Test analysis was performed to determine the reflections of the virtual learning environment on the real learning environment through pre-tests and post-tests with the scale determined as the quantitative data collection tool. Based on the findings obtained from the research, it was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test values in line with the analysis made with the attitude scale towards e-learning in sports used for the students participating in the study to experience the Pickleball branch in the e-learning environment. It was determined that the post-test score averages of the attitude scale towards e-learning in sports were higher than the pre-test score averages. According to this result, it was determined that the Pickleball branch experienced through video recordings in the e-learning environment in sports could be transferred to the real environment in a positive and positive way. The research findings reveal that the preliminary learning formed with visual and animated video recordings watched in the e-learning environment can be applied in real environments. This finding shows that the preliminary learning supported by visual and animated video content can be transformed into practical applications and that e-learning is an effective method in the successful acquisition of sports skills. As a result, it is recommended that e-learning be used more widely as an effective teaching method in the development of both theoretical and practical skills in sports.

Bu çalışmada, ilkokul öğrencilerinin sporda e-öğrenme ortamında, sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutumun sanal ortamda Pickleball branşın deneyimlenmesinin gerçek ortama yansımasını ortaya koymayı amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, Ankara ilinde MEB’e bağlı, Şehit Ender Alper İlkokulu’nda öğrenim gören 7-11 yaş aralığında ve eğitimine devam eden, 180’i kız (%49,7) ve 182’si erkek (%50,3) olmak üzere toplam 362 gönüllü öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma modellerinden ön-test son-test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “Pickleball Branşı Öğrenme Basamaklaması” ve “Sporda E-öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Veriler, SPSS istatistik programında analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma grubunun demografik bilgileri ile sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeğine verilen cevaplar, yüzde (%), frekans (f), aritmetik ortalama (x̅) ve standart sapma (Ss) gibi tanımlayıcı istatistikler yardımıyla özetlenmiştir Ayrıca, nicel veri toplama aracı olarak belirlenen ölçekle yapılan ön test ve son testler aracılığıyla, sanal öğrenme ortamının gerçek öğrenme ortamına yansımalarını belirlemek amacıyla Paired Sample T-Test analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulardan hareketle, çalışmaya katılan öğrencilerin sporda e-öğrenme ortamında Pickleball branşının deneyimlenmesi için kullanılan sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeği ile yapılan analiz doğrultusunda ön-test ve son-test değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiş. Sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeğinin son test puan ortalamalarının, ön test puan ortalamalarından daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuca göre, sporda e-öğrenme ortamında video kayıtları aracılığıyla deneyimlenen Pickleball branşının, gerçek ortama olumlu ve pozitif bir şekilde aktarılabildiği belirlenmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, e-öğrenme ortamında izlenen görsel ve hareketli video kayıtlarıyla oluşan ön öğrenmelerin, gerçek ortamlarda uygulanabilir olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bulgu, görsel ve hareketli video içerikleriyle desteklenen ön öğrenmelerin pratik uygulamalara dönüştürülebileceğini ve e-öğrenmenin spor becerilerinin başarılı bir şekilde kazandırılmasında etkili bir yöntem olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, e-öğrenmenin sporda hem teorik hem de uygulamalı becerilerin geliştirilmesinde etkili bir öğretim yöntemi olarak daha geniş bir şekilde kullanılması önerilmektedir.

 İlkokul öğrencileri Pickleball Sporda e-öğrenme Sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum Primary school students Pickleball E-learning in sport Attitude towards e-learning in sport Agudo-Peregrina, á. F., Hernández-García, á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral Intention, Use Behavior and the Acceptance of Electronic Learning Systems: Differences between Higher Education and Lifelong Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34(2014), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035 Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 2(1), 15-44. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.003 Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University. Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus. Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124. Büyüköztük, Ş., Çakmak E., Akgün Ö., Karadeniz Ş., & Demirel F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (22. baskı). Pegem. Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Mathew, V. N. (2020). Are you ready? An assessment of online learning readiness among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 301-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i1/7128 Daum, D. N., Goad, T., Mosier, B., & Killian, C. M. (2022). Toward quality online physical education: Research questions and future directions. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 6(4), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2021.1930295 Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43-62). Springer. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 Fairclough, S. J., & Stratton, G. (2005). Physical education makes you fit and healthy. Physical education contribution to young people's physical activity levels. Health Education Research, 20(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg101 Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2004). E-learning in the 21st century: Framework for research and practice. Journal of distance learning, 8(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093 Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.63032 Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. Sage. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004 Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Yeni insan ve insanlar (10. basım). Evrim. Kırık, A. M. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimin tarihsel gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 1(21), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.17829/midr.20142110299 Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/ Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers college record, 115(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307 Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220 Micua, D. B., San Gabriel, A. M., Garcia, R. B. M., & Domingo, M. S. (2023). Enhancing physical education learning through modernized interactive teaching approaches: a student perception and academic performance study. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 9(8), 384-391. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra14165 Moustakas, L., & Robrade, D. (2022). The challenges and realities of e-learning during COVID-19: The case of university sport and physical education. Challenges, 13(9), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010009 Mutlu Bozkurt, T., & Tamer, K. (2020). “Sporda E-Öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği”. International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 6(36), 1761-1771. http://dx.doi.org/10.31576/smryj.634 Pillay, H., Irving, K., & Tones, M. (2007). Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing tertiary students’ readiness for online learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310821 Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students' engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of computer assisted learning, 35(3), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12340 Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(2008), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3 ed.). Bloomsbury. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. ed.). Pearson. Varea, V., & González-Calvo, G. (2021). Touchless classes and absent bodies: teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, education and society, 26(8), 831-845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814 Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41(2003), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4 Welk, G. J., Maduro, P. F., Laurson, K. R., & Brown, D. D. (2011). Field evaluation of the new FITNESSGRAM® criterion-referenced standards. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(4S2), 131– 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.011