Tasarım Öğrencilerinin Spinal Ağrı, Fonksiyonellik ve Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Masa başı pozisyonlarda uzun saatler çalışan tasarım öğrencileri omurga sorunları açısından risk grubunda olabilir. Öğrencilerin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri omurga sorunlarıyla ilişkili bir faktör olabilir. Bu çalışmada tasarım öğrencilerinde omurga ağrısı ve işlevselliği ile fiziksel aktivite düzeylerini incelemek ve bu değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amaçlandı. Yöntem: Çalışma Mimarlık Bölümü ve Görsel İletişim Tasarımı Bölümü'nde öğrenim gören 125 öğrenci ile gerçekleştirildi. Omurga ağrısının yeri ve zamanının değerlendirmesine ek olarak ve ağrı şiddeti Visüel Analog Skala (VAS) ile belirlendi. Omurga semptomlarının fonksiyonel düzey üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemek için Omurga Fonksiyonel İndeksi (OFI) kullanılmıştır. Fiziksel aktivite düzeyini belirlemek için Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite İndeksi - Kısa Form (UFAI-KF) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Günlük çizim süresi fazla olan öğrencilerin ağrı şiddetinin daha yüksek olduğu (p<0.05) ve omurga fonksiyonlarının olumsuz etkilendiği (p<0.05) tespit edildi. Spinal ağrı düzeyi yüksek olan öğrencilerin spinal fonksiyonları daha kötü bulundu (p<0.05). Ağrı düzeyleri ile OFI sonuçları ve fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri arasında ilişki olmadığı tespit edildi (p>0.05). Sonuç: Tasarım öğrencilerinin omurga ağrılarını azaltmak ve işlevselliklerini artırmak için postüral farkındalık eğitimlerinin verilmesi, omurga ağrısı şikayeti olan öğrencilere gerektiğinde uzman desteği sağlanması ve fiziksel aktivite düzeylerini artırmaya yönelik önerilerde bulunulması faydalı olacaktır.

Keywords

• tasarım öğrencileri
• ağrı
• omurga
• fiziksel aktivite

INVESTIGATION OF SPINAL PAIN AND FUNCTIONALITY, AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVELS OF DESIGN STUDENTS

Abstract

Objectives : Design students who work long hours in desk-based positions may be in the at-risk group for spinal problems. Physical activity levels of students may be a factor associated with spinal problems. The aim of this study was to investigate spinal pain and functionality and physical activity levels in design students and to determine the relationship between these variables. Methods: The study was carried out with 125 students studying in the Department of Architecture and Department of Visual Communication Design. The location and time of the spinal pain were questioned and the pain severity was determined with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Spine Functional Index (SFI) was used to determine the effects of spinal symptoms on functional level. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) was used to determine the physical activity level. Results: It was determined that the students with longer daily drawing time had higher pain intensity (p<0.05) and the spinal functionality of the students with a high daily drawing time was found to be adversely affected (p<0.05). Spinal functions were found to be worse in students with high spinal pain level (p<0.05). It was found that there was no relationship between pain levels, SFI results and physical activity levels (p>0.05). Conclusion: In order to reduce the spine pain of the design students and increase their functionality postural awareness trainings to be given, providing expert support to students with spinal pain complaints when necessary, and suggestions to increase their physical activity levels would be beneficial.

Keywords

• desing students
• pain
• spine
• physical activity

References

1. [1] Kahraman ME. Curriculum proposal for the basic design course. Yıldız J Art Des. 2017;4(1):88–96.
2. [2] Kahraman ME. The effect of the COVID-19 epidemic on applied courses and the conduct of these courses with distance education: an example of a basic design course. J Medeniyet Art. 2020;6(1):44–56.
3. [3] Yamacli R, Ozen A, Tokman LY. An experimental study in an architectural design studio: the search for three-dimensional form and aesthetics through clay. Int J Art Des Educ. 2005;24(3):308–14.
4. [4] Mun B, Arslan S. Lerning by doing in architectural design and educational pavilionsmanufactured by students. EJONS Int J Math Eng Nat Sci. 2018;2(2):12–25.
5. [5] Yağcı N, Çalık BB. Investigation of the effect of desktop computer use on neck pain in university students. J Occup Ther Rehabil. 2014;2(2):65–72.
6. [6] Altin MA, Ülker O. A study on ergonomic problems of design students during intense distant education period in COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development. 2021;13(3):188–201.
7. [7] Akyürek G, Üstün B. Comparison of pain, stress and physical activity levels of academic staff according to ergonomic arrangement in offices. Süleyman Demirel University The Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;12(3):386–94.
8. [8] Sur Unal U, Cifcili SS. The prevalence of performance-related musculoskeletal disorders in fine arts faculty students and academics. Work. 2020;66(1):125–33.

9. [9] Yazıcı K, Tot Ş, Biçer A, et al. Anxiety, depression and quality of life in low back and neck pain patients. Turk J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;6(2):95–101.
10. [10] Serra MVGB, Camargo PR, Zaia JE, Tonello MGM, Quemelo PRV. Effects of physical exercise on musculoskeletal disorders, stress and quality of life in workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(1):62–7.
11. [11] Cetin H, Bilgin S, Köse N. A comparison of occupational groups using different working postures in terms of their low back and neck health status. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):475–80.
12. [12] Özdinç S, Turan FN. Investigation of the relationship between musculoskeletal system problems and physical activity and stress levels in health sciences students. J Health Sci Prof. 2019;6(2):247–55.
13. [13] Hendi OM, Abdulaziz AA, Althaqafi AM, Hindi AM, Khan SA, Atalla AA. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and its correlation to physical activity among health specialty students. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10(1):48.
14. [14] Pihl E, Matsin T, Jurimae T. Physical activity, musculoskeletal disorders and cardiovascular risk factors in male physical education teachers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002;42(4):466.
15. [15] Krüger T, Behrens JR, Grobelny A, Otte K, Mansow-Model S, Kayser B, Bellmann-Strobl J, Brandt AU, Paul F, Schmitz-Hübsch T. Subjective and objective assessment of physical activity in multiple sclerosis and their relation to health-related quality of life. BMC Neurol. 2017;17:1–12.
16. [16] Myles PS, Troedel S, Boquest M, Reeves M. The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear? Anesth Analg. 1999;89(6):1517.
17. [17] Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(12):1153–7.
18. [18] Tonga E, Gabel CP, Karayazgan S, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Spine Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:1–9.
19. [19] Saglam M, Arıkan H, Savcı S, İnal-İnce D, Boşnak-Güçlü M, Karabulut E, Tokgözoğlu L. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):278–84.
20. [20] Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.
21. [21] Abidi S, Sidhu SS, Singh M. Ergonomic posture and musculoskeletal problems in architecture students. In: TEQIP-II Sponsored National Conference on “Latest Developments in Materials, Manufacturing and Quality Control”. 2015.
22. [22] Ariëns GAM, Bongers PM, Douwes M, Miedema MC, Hoogendoorn WE, van der Wal G, Bouter LM, van Mechelen W. Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58(3):200–7.
23. [23] Côté P, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso PM. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(2 Suppl):S70–86.
24. [24] Ekechukwu END, Aguwa EN, Okeke TA, Iroezindu IC, Onyia SU, Abaraogu DO, Anyaehie UB, Utti VA. Prevalence, correlates and risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders among Nigerian physiotherapy and architecture undergraduates. J Niger Soc Physiother. 2020;19(1):8–18.
25. [25] Sadeghi N, Habibi E, Sajjadi S. The relationships between musculoskeletal disorders and anthropometric indices in public vehicle drivers. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health. 2012;4(6):1173-1184.
26. [26] Lin CWC, McAuley JH, Macedo L, Barnett DC, Smeets RJ, Verbunt JA. Relationship between physical activity and disability in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2011;152(3):607–13.