Mapping Global Research on Early Childhood Special Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

Early childhood special education is a scientific field that is gaining worldwide attention. This study uses bibliometric and social network analysis methods to analyze early childhood special education research published in international journals. Therefore, the articles in the WoS database were accessed. WoS is a database of the most prestigious journals indexed SSCI, SCI-Expanded, AHCI, and ESCI. A total of 2051 articles meeting the determined criteria were included in the research. We used the VoSviewer software to perform the analyses and then interpreted the results. According to the research findings, the number of works published in the related field has increased significantly. The Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders has emerged as the most prolific publisher of articles on this topic. The United States stands out as the most productive country. Dawson, G. is the most effective and cited author. The most frequently used word in the studies examined was autism. It appears that political developments in the field of early childhood special education may contribute to this increase. In addition, the analysis revealed that a certain number of leading countries and researchers have made significant contributions to the field. İnfluential journals in the field of early childhood special education studies, it is noted, focus on special education.

Keywords

• Early Childhood
• Special Education
• Bibliometric Analysis

References

1. Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., ... & Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health services research, 42(1p1), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
2. Allison, P., & Stewart, J. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 596-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094424
3. Andrés, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Elsevier.
4. Banerjee, R., Movahedazarhouligh, S., Millen, K., & Luckner, J. L. (2018). Building evidence in early childhood special education: A systematic review of replication intervention studies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(4), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121417748197
5. Bonuck, K. A., Hyden, C., Ury, G., Barnett, J., Ashkinaze, H., & Briggs, R. D. (2011). Screening for sleep problems in early intervention and early childhood special education: A systematic review of screening and assessment instruments. Infants & Young Children, 24(4), 295-308. https://doi.org/doi:%2010.1097/IYC.0b013e3182234444
6. Bowe, F. G. (2007). Early childhood special education: Birth to eight (4th ed.). Thomson Delmar Learning.
7. Bricker, D., Xie, H., & Bohjanen, S. (2018). A history of EI/ECSE in the United States: A personal perspective. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118771392.
8. Bruder, M. B. (2016). Personnel development practices in early childhood intervention. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, & S. L. Odom (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 289-333). Springer International Publishing.

9. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
10. Cretu, D. M., & Morandau, F. (2020). Initial teacher education for inclusive education: A bibliometric analysis of educational research. Sustainability, 12(12), 4923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124923
11. Dunlap, L. L. (2005). An introduction to early childhood special education: Birth to age five. Pearson Education.
12. Dunst, C. J., & Espe-Sherwindt, M. (2016). Family-centered practices in early childhood intervention. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, & S. L. Odom (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 37-56). Springer International Publishing.
13. Grosseck, G., Țîru, L. G., & Bran, R. A. (2019). Education for sustainable development: Evolution and perspectives: A bibliometric review of research, 1992–2018. Sustainability, 11(21), 6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216136
14. Guralnick, M. J. (2005). The developmental systems approach to early intervention. Brookes Publishing.
15. Gül-Olcay, S., & Diken, İ. H. (2009). A review of master and doctoral dissertations in the field of early childhood special education in Turkey. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 1(1), 46-78. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.107977
16. Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, 1965– 2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772
17. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
18. Hernández-Torrano, D. (2020). Mapping global research on child well-being in school contexts: A bibliometric and network analysis (1978–2018). Child Indicators Research, 13(3), 863-884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09659-x
19. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
20. Kilduff, M. & Tsai, W. (2008). Social networks and organizations. Sage.
21. Kim, K. W. (2006). Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: Taking the context into consideration. Scientometrics, 66(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0017-0
22. Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Ashbaugh, K., & Bradshaw, J. (2014). The importance of early identification and intervention for children with or at risk for autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 16(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2013.861511
23. Liu, W. (2019). The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1815-1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03238-1
24. McCormick, K. M., & Brennan, S. (2001). Mentoring the new professional in interdisciplinary early childhood education: The Kentucky Teacher Internship Program. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(3), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112140102100301
25. McLean, M., Sandall, S.R., & Smith, B.J. (2016). A history of early childhood special education. In B. Reichow et al. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education. (pp. 3–19). Springer International Publishing.
26. McWilliam R. (2016). Birth to three early intervention. In Reichow B., Boyd B., Barton E., Odom S. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 75-88), Springer.
27. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 58(13), 2105-2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677
28. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
29. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
30. Mosbah-Natanson, S., & Gingras, Y. (2014). The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration, and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009). Current sociology, 62(5), 626-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113498866
31. Oser, C., & Cohen, J. (2003). Improving Part C Early Intervention: Using what we know about infants and toddlers with disabilities to reauthorize Part C of IDEA. Retrieved from https://www.zerotothree.org/ztt_policy.html
32. Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
33. Öncül, N. (2015). Review of the Articles Related with Early Childhood Special Education in Turkey. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 6(2), 247-284. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.75598
34. Safford, P., Sargent, M., & Cook, C. (1994). Instructional models in early childhood special education: Origins, issues, and trends. In P. Safford (Ed.), Early childhood special education: Yearbook in early childhood education (Vol. 5, pp. 96—117). New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
36. Smith, B. J. (2000). The federal role in early childhood special education policy in the next century: The responsibility of the individual. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112140002000102
37. Snyder, S., & Sheehan, R. (1983). Integrating research in early childhood special education: The use of meta-analysis. Diagnostique, 9(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724778300900102
38. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice (pp. 285–320). Springer.
39. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
40. Virués-Ortega, J. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose–response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4), 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.008
41. Wang, J., Peters, H. P., & Guan, J. (2006). Factors influencing knowledge productivity in German research groups: Lessons for developing countries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610679408
42. Webb, S. J., & Jones, E. J. (2009). Early identification of autism: Early characteristics, onset of symptoms, and diagnostic stability. Infants and Young Children, 22(2), 100. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5232420/
43. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(4), 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4%3C327::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-4
44. Wolery, M. (2003). A unified theory of practice in early intervention/early childhood special education: Evidence-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 164-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030601
45. Yildirim, E. S., & Akçamete, G. (2014). Determination of Difficulties Encountered by Mothers Having Children with Multiple Disabilities During Early Childhood Special Education Services Process. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 3(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.321336
46. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627-657. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005632319799
47. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
48. Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., & Garon, N. (2013). Early identification of autism spectrum disorders. Behavioural Brain Research, 251, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.004