Attitude Scale Toward Innovation for Primary School Students: Scale Development and Validation

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 210 - 235, 31.08.2025

Musa Çalışır , Elif Korkmaz , Mustafa Bektaş

https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1602329

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale to assess the attitudes of primary school students toward innovation. The research was conducted with data from 733 third- and fourth-grade students in the Marmara Region. Designed as a descriptive study, the research employed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to evaluate the data. Initially, a literature review examined the concept of innovation and how it could be measured appropriately for children. Based on the findings, a pool of 44 items was created using a five-point Likert scale (ranging from strongly disagree to agree strongly). After expert reviews and a pilot study, this pool was refined to 38 items. The exploratory factor analysis results indicated that the scale consisted of four factors: Curiosity, Self-Confidence, Alternative Usage, and Creativity. These factors accounted for 55.66% of the total variance. Each factor included three items, with factor loadings exceeding 0.30, which supported the construct validity of the scale. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the model demonstrated excellent goodness-of-fit values. Findings from the second-order CFA confirmed the relationship between the factors and innovation and showed an excellent fit. As a result, this study developed a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the attitudes of primary school students toward innovation. The scale is anticipated to help understand students' tendencies toward innovative thinking, develop strategies to enhance these tendencies, and evaluate innovation-focused educational programs.

Keywords

Innovation , Primary School Students , Scale Development

References

• Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318805832
• Adelson, J. L., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the mathematical attitudes of elementary students: The effects of a 4-point or 5-point Likert-type scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410366694
• Ahmed, A. M., & Abdalla, H. S. (1999). The role of innovation process in crafting the vision of the future. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37(1–2), 421-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00108-4
• Akar, C., & Uluçınar, U. (2023). A scale development study on democratic attitude among third and fourth grade students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202320926
• Akdeniz, M. Y. (2020). İnovasyon eğitim programının öğretmenlerin bireysel yenilikçilik davranışlarına etkisi [The effect of innovation education program on teachers 'individual innovation behavior] (Publication No. 641950) [Master’s thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University]. CoHE Thesis Center.
• Akkaya, D. (2016). İlköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin inovasyon becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of innovation skills of 7th grade primary school students] (Publication No. 435869) [Master’s thesis, Adnan Menderes University]. CoHE Thesis Center.
• Akyos, M. (2007). Kamuda inovasyon. https://www.inovasyon.org/images/makaleler/pdf/MA.Kamuda.Inovasyon.pdf
• Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2006). A measure of organizational learning capability. International Journal of Manpower, 27(6), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610683978
• Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2001). Schools, achievement, and inequality: A seasonal perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002171
• Alkış Küçükaydın, M., Akkanat Avşar, Ç., Ayaz, E., & Sayıcı, E. (2024). Predictors of science identity in primary school: Epistemological beliefs, competency beliefs, and science learning experiences. International Journal of Science Education, 47(9), 1169-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2361172
• Altınışık, H. Z., Adıgüzel, T., & Gençer, Y. G. (2023). Adaptation of youth innovational skills measurement tool for Turkish usage. Kastamonu Education Journal, 31(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1246467
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
• Attema-Noordewier, S., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Core reflection in primary schools: A new approach to educational innovation. In F. A. J. Korthagen, Y. M. Kim, & W. L. Greene (Eds.), Teaching and learning from within (pp. 111–130). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121405
• Balantekin, Y., & Oksal, A. (2014). İlkokul 3. ve 4. sınıf öğrencileri için matematik dersi motivasyon ölçeği [Mathematics lesson motivation scale for primary school 3th and 4th grade students]. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 3(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.321344
• Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme [A conceptual review of sampling methods and sample size problems in qualitative research]. Bitlis Eren University Social Science Journal, 7(1), 231-274.
• Bayrakçı, M., & Eraslan, F. (2014). Ortaöğretim okul yöneticilerinin inovasyon yeterlilikleri [Inavation compatance of highschool administrator]. Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty, (28), 96–135.
• Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 871–915. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193913
• Biasi, B., Deming, D., & Moser, P. (2021). Education and innovation (NBER Working Paper No. 28927). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28927
• Boak, G. (2022). Action learning and innovation. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 19(3), 228–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2022.2130721
• Boyacı, S. D., & Atalay, N. (2016). A scale development for 21st century skills of primary school students: A validity and reliability study. International journal of instruction, 9(1), 133-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9111a
• Brennan, J., Broek, S., Durazzi, N., Kamphuis, B. W., Ranga, M., & Ryan, S. (2014). Study on innovation in higher education: Final report. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2766/81897
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (29. Ed.). Pegem Akademi.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (28. Ed.). Pegem Akademi.
• Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588283
• Çayak, S., & Erol, İ. (2022). Öğretmenlerin değişime hazır olma düzeyleri ile okulların inovasyon düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between teachers’ readiness for change and the innovation levels of schools]. Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education Journal, 23(2), 1529–1558. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1035762
• Çelik, P., Storme, M., Davila, A., & Myszkowski, N. (2016). Work-related curiosity positively predicts worker innovation. Journal of Management Development, 35(9), 1184–1194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2016-0013
• Çeliktaş, H. (2008). İnovasyon yönetimi, Çukurova Bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren şirketlerde inovasyon uygulamalarının tespitine yönelik bir araştırma [Innovation management and an investigation on company which are in Çukurova region about innovation practice] (Publication No. 217115) [Master’s thesis, Çukurova University]. CoHE Thesis Center.
• Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
• Chong, E., & Ma, X. (2010). The influence of individual factors, supervision and work environment on creative self‐efficacy: Individual factors, supervision and work environment. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00557.x
• Chu, S. K. W., Tavares, N. J., Chu, D., Ho, S. Y., Chow, K., Siu, F. L. C., & Wong, M. (2012). Developing upper primary students’ 21st century skills: Inquiry learning through collaborative teaching and Web 2.0 technology. Centre for Information Technology in Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161055
• Clauss, T. (2016). Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12186
• Cobo, C. (2013). Skills for innovation: Envisioning an education that prepares for the changing world. The Curriculum Journal, 24(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744330
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (2nd ed.). Pegem Akademi.
• Cropley, D. H. (2006). The role of creativity as a driver of innovation. In K. H. Chai, C. C. Hang, & M. Xie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (Vol. 2, pp. 561–565). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2006.262281
• Damiano, R. J. (2011). What is innovation? Innovations: Technology and techniques in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, 6(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182162bcf
• Deveci, İ., & Kavak, S. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik algıları ve yenilikçi düşünme eğilimleri: Bir keşfedici ardışık desen [Innovativeness perceptions and innovative thinking tendencies of middle school students: an exploratory sequential design]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 346-378. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.15m
• DeVellis, R. F. (2022). Ölçek geliştirme: Kuram ve uygulamalar. Nobel Yayınevi.
• Doğan, C. D., & Aybek, E. C. (2021). R-Shiny ile psikometri ve istatistik uygulamaları. In B. Atar, K. Atalay Kabasakal, E. B. Ünsal Özberk, E. H. Özberk, & N. K. Uysal (Eds.), R ile veri analizi ve psikometri uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
• Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Leader to Leader, 1998(9), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.40619980906
• Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Rivera León, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.) (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship (17th ed.). World Intellectual Property Organization. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.50062
• Elçi, Ş., & Karataylı, İ. (2008). İnovasyon rehberi: Kârlılık ve rekabetin elkitabı. Technopolis Group.
• Erdemet, F. (2017). Özel lise yöneticilerinin inovasyon sürecine ilişkin görüşleri [Private high school principals’ views about the process of innovation in education] (Publication No. 483326) [Master’s thesis, İstanbul Kültür University]. CoHE Thesis Center.
• Eren, H., Bakan, S., Yıldız, İ., & Yaray, E. (2024). Ortaokul okul yöneticilerinin inovasyon yeterlilikleri [Inavation compatance of highschool administrator]. The National Journal of Original Educational Research, 2(1), 126–139.
• Ergöz, T., Yıldırım, E., Ergöz, M., & Yılmaz, V. (2023). Eğitim yönetiminde değişim yönetimi: Okullarda inovasyon ve gelişim için stratejiler [Change management in educational administration: Strategies for innovation and improvement in schools]. International Academic Social Resources Journal, 8(55), 4134-4142. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASRJOURNAL.72999
• Eurostat, & OECD. (2005). Oslo kılavuzu: Yenilik verilerinin toplanmasi ve yorumlanmasi için ilkeler (3. Ed.). TÜBİTAK.
• Eurostat. (n.d.-a). Glossary: Process innovation. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Process_innovation
• Eurostat. (n.d.-b). Glossary: Organisational innovation. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Organisational_innovation
• Eurostat. (n.d.-c). Glossary: Product innovation. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Product_innovation
• Eurostat. (n.d.-d). Glossary: Marketing innovation. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Marketing_innovation
• Fernández-Rodríguez Labordeta, J., & Giménez, G. (2012). The effect of quantity and quality of education on innovation. Intangible Capital, 8(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.345
• Fidan, M. (2019). Öğretmenlerde bireysel inovasyon ile öz liderlik arasindaki ilişki [The relationship between individual innovation and self leadership in teachers]. International Journal of Management Academy, 2(3), 518-527. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.661672
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
• Flight, R. L., D’Souza, G., Reynold, D., & Allaway, A. W. (2011). Characteristics-based innovation adoption: Scale and model validation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00794.x
• Gedik, R., & Demirezen, S. (2023). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin yenilikçi düşünme becerilerinin incelenmesi [Examining the innovative thinking skills of middle school students]. Cumhuriyet International Education Journal, 12(3), 743-759. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1276359
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (10. Ed.). Pearson Education.
• Gerber, E., Martin, C. K., Kramer, E., Braunstein, J., & Carberry, A. R. (2012). Work in progress: Developing an innovation self-efficacy survey. In 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–3). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462435
• Girardi, A., Soutar, G. N., & Ward, S. (2005). The validation of a use innovativeness scale. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(4), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060510627830
• Gökbulut, B. (2021). Öğretmenlerin bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri [Individual innovativeness levels of teachers]. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 204–214.
• Gross, M. E., Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2020). Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.015
• Hacıömeroğlu, G., Bilgen, S. & Tabuk, M. (2013). Başarı Duygusu Ölçeği-İlkokul’un Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması [Turkish adaptation of Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Elementary School]. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 38, 85-96.
• Hall, L., Hume, C., & Tazzyman, S. (2016). Five degrees of happiness: Effective smiley face Likert scales for evaluating with children. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16) (pp. 311–321). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930719
• Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195339888.001.0001
• Heißenberger, P. (2016). Leadership for primary schools: An examination of innovation within an Austrian educational context. Global Education Review, 3(1), 148-163.
• Herz, H., Schunk, D., & Zehnder, C. (2014). How do judgmental overconfidence and overoptimism shape innovative activity? Games and Economic Behavior, 83, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.11.001
• Hornstra, L., van der Veen, I., Peetsma, T., & Volman, M. (2015). Innovative learning and developments in motivation and achievement in upper primary school. Educational Psychology, 35(5), 598–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.922164
• Hovne, A. S., Hovne, B. S., & Schøtt, T. (2014). Entrepreneurs’ innovation benefitting from their education and training and from national policy and culture: A global study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 23(1/2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2014.066656
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Hutcheson, G. D., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: An introduction to generalized linear models. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028075
• Işık, N., & Kılınç, E. C. (2012). İnovasyon-temelli ekonomi: Seçilmiş ülkeler üzerine bir uygulama [Innovation-driven economy: An application on the selected countries]. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 13–28.
• Ivancovsky, T., Baror, S., & Bar, M. (2023). A shared novelty-seeking basis for creativity and curiosity. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 47(e89), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23002807
• Karahan, M., & Patir, S. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kendine güven ve risk alma davranışları ile inovasyon düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Examining the relationships between university students' self-confidence and risk-taking behaviours and their innovativeness levels]. Journal of Yaşar University, 16(63), 1498–1515. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.892087
• Kavacık, L., Yanpar Yelken, T., & Sürmeli, H. (2015). Innovation practices in elementary school science and technology course and their effects on students. Education and Science, 40(180), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.2613
• Kaya, E., & İzci, E. (2024). Fen bilimleri dersine yönelik tutum ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalişması [Developing an attitude scale for science course; validity and reliability study]. Journal of History School, 17(69), 1082–1099. https://doi.org/10.29129/inujgse.542568
• Keleşoğlu, S., & Kalaycı, N. (2017). Dördüncü sanayi devriminin eşiğinde yaratıcılık, inovasyon ve eğitim ilişkisi [On the threshold of the fourth industrial revolution, innovation and education relationship]. Creative Drama Journal, 12(1), 69–86.
• Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2010). Bireysel İnovasyon Ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Individual Innovativeness Scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 150–164.
• Klausen, S. H. (2017). What is innovation? In E. Shiu (Ed.), Research handbook of innovation and creativity for marketing management (pp. 6–31). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857937957.00008
• Koellinger, P. (2007). Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Business Economics, 31, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11187-008-9107-0
• Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00088
• Kumar, R., & Uzkurt, C. (2010). Investigating the effects of self-efficacy on innovativeness and the moderating impact of cultural dimensions. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 1–15. https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/10631.pdf
• Kuo, W. (2019). Soulware: The American way in China's higher education. Scrivener Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119509929
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
• Leiponen, A. (1996). Education and innovative capabilities (IIASA Working Paper No. WP-96-140). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/4922
• Leoste, J., Heidmets, M., Ley, T., & Stepanova, J. (2021). Classroom innovation becoming sustainable: A study of technological innovation adoption by Estonian primary school teachers. Interaction Design & Architecture(s), (47), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-047-007
• Leskinen, J., Kajamaa, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2023). Learning to innovate: Students and teachers constructing collective innovation practices in a primary school’s makerspace. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.936724
• Likar, B., Cankar, F., & Zupan, B. (2014). Educational model for promoting creativity and innovation in primary schools: Creativity and innovation in primary school. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2261
• Maravilhas, S. (2015). Creativity, invention, and innovation. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (3rd ed., pp. 4071–4079). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch401
• Massey, S. (2021). Children's use of emojis in Likert-type response scales: Exploring new methods in attitude measurement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(5), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1940774
• Medyna, G., Coatanéa, E., Christophe, F., Bakhouya, M., Choulier, D., & Forest, J. (2013). Creativity from design and innovation perspectives. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1–8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_32
• Mellor, D., & Moore, K. A. (2014). The use of Likert scales with children. Journal of pediatric psychology, 39(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst079
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli öğretim programları ortak metni. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/brosur/ortak_metin.pdf
• Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2016). Innovation in the collective brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0192
• Naillioğlu Kaymak, M., Çelik Şahin, Ç., & Güçlü Yılmaz, F. (2022). Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği’nin okul yöneticileri için uyarlanması: Türkçe geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of Individual Innovativeness Scale for school principals: Turkish validity-reliability study]. Humanistic Perspective, 4(2), 307-333. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.1054256
• Nayak, R. C., & Agarwal, R. (2011). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. International Journal of Transformations in Business Management, 1(1), 1–8.
• Nowotny, H. (2008). Insatiable curiosity: Innovation in a fragile future. The MIT Press.
• OECD. (2010). The OECD innovation strategy: Getting a head start on tomorrow. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264083479-en
• Okpara, F. O. (2007). The value of creativity and innovation in entrepreneurship. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 3(2).
• Örtlek, Z. (2015). İnovasyon ve bölgesel kalkınma perspektifinden Türkiye [Turkey from innovation and regional development perspective] (Publication No. 417985) [Master’s thesis, Aksaray University]. CoHE Thesis Center.
• Ovacı, C., & Yıldırım Saatçi, E. (2020). Bireysel inovasyon yetkinlikleri ölçümlenmesi: Ölçek uyarlama çalışması [Measurement of individual innovation competencies: Scale adaptation study]. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 7(1), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.602669
• Özer, D. (2022). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin bireysel inovasyon düzeylerinin bazı demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. [Final Project, Pamukkale University]. GCRIS.
• Özerdem, A. Y., & Serin, O. (2022). Okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin inovasyon yeterliliklerinin incelenmesi (KKTC Örneklemi) [The study of teachers and school managers innovation qualifications (TRNC sample)]. International Journal of New Trends İn Arts, Sports & Science Education (Ijtase), 11(1), 43-57.
• Patil, R. (2024). Nurturing innovation and creativity for business success. JCMM’s Kaleidoscope Journal of Management Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.62801/jkjmr-v1i1-12
• Pierce, J., & Delbecq, A. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1977.4409154
• Pollock, K. (2008). The four pillars of innovation: An elementary school perspective. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 13(2), 2–17.
• Puente-Díaz, R., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Creative self-beliefs and their implications for creativity and innovation. In A. Brem, R. Puente-Díaz, & M. Agogué (Eds.), The role of creativity in the management of innovation: State of the art and future research outlook (pp. 149–158). World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813141889_0008
• Rabinowitz, W., & Miles, M. B. (1965). Innovation in education. American Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162069
• Sarıçan, E. (2018). Okullarda entelektüel sermaye, inovasyon ve etkililik ilişkisi [The relationship between intellectual capital, innovation and effectiveness at schools] (Publication No. 495544) [Doctoral dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. CoHE Thesis Center.
• Sarıoğlu, A. (2014). Bireysel İnovasyon Ölçeğinin hemşirelikte geçerlik ve güvenirliği [Validity and reliability of the Individual Innovation Scale in nursing] (Publication No. 379447) [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University]. CoHE Thesis Center.
• Sawyer, R. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2005.08.001
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
• Soderlund, A. (2020). Implementing 21st century learning and innovation skills in classrooms. [Master’s thesis, Northwestern College]. NWCommons.
• Stokoe, R. (2012). Curiosity, a condition for learning. The International Schools Journal, 32(1), 63.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. Ed.). Pearson.
• Tahiroğlu, M. & Çakır, S. (2014). İlkokul 4. sınıflara yönelik Matematik Motivasyon Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi [Development of Mathematics Motivation Scale related to elementary education 4th grade]. Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education Journal, 15(3), 29-48.
• Taş, S. (2017). İnovasyon, eğitim ve küresel inovasyon endeksi [Innovation, education and global innovation index]. Bilge Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 99–123.
• Taylor, S. (2017) What is innovation? A study of the definitions, academic models and applicability of innovation to an example of social housing in England. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 128-146. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.511010
• Toma, R. B. (2021). Measuring children’s perceived cost of school science: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101009
• Türk Dil Kurumu [TDK]. (n.d.). Türk Dil Kurumu sözlük. Retrieved May 30, 2025, from https://sozluk.gov.tr/
• Türkiye İhracatçılar Meclisi [TİM]. (2022). Türkiye Küresel İnovasyon Endeksi Eylem Planı ve Stratejisi 2021–2023. https://tim.org.tr/files/downloads/Raporlar/Küresel%20İnovasyon%20Endeksi%20Türkiye%20Eylem%20Planı%20ve%20Stratejisi%202021-2023.pdf
• Uysal, İ., & Sarıça, S. (2018). Çizgi filmlerin ilkokul öğrencilerinin duyuşsal özelliklerine etkisine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması [Scale development study about the effect of cartoon movies on affective characteristics of elementary school students]. Elementary Education Online, 17(3), 1302-1316. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466347
• Walsh, C., Knott, P., & Collins, J. (2022). The driving mindsets of innovation: Curiosity, creativity and clarity. The Journal of Business Strategy, 43(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-08-2020-0176
• Yalçıntaş Gülbaş, S. (2011). İnovasyon: Teknopark modeli [Innovation: Technopark model]. Journal of ANKEM, 25(2), 139–145.
• Yıldız, E. (2021). The effect of prosocial behaviours on social innovation: A scale development study. International Journal of Social Science Research, 10(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.30560/ijssr.v10n2p89
• Yılmaz, Z., & İncekaş, E. (2018). Türkiye’de inovasyon ve bölgesel kalkınma [Innovation and regional development in Turkey]. Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 154–169.
• Yüner, B., & Özdemir, M. (2020). Okul yenilikçiliği ile öğretmen yaratıcılığı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examination of the relationship between school innovation and teacher creativity]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, (50), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.538207
• Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262-307.