In silico research on Novel Derivatives of N-(Acetylphenyl)-N-Ferrocenylmethyl-3-nitroaniline as DNA Binding Agents: Using Diverse Computational Methods, including Molecular Docking and ADME/Toxicity Assessment

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 93 - 102

Asma Yahiaoui Nabil Benyza Amel Messai Touhami Lanez Lanez Elhafnaoui

https://doi.org/10.33435/tcandtc.1400064

Öz

This study presents an in silico investigation into the potential DNA binding properties of novel derivatives of N-(Acetylphenyl)-N-Ferrocenylmethylnitroaniline using different computational techniques, including molecular docking and ADME/Toxicity assessment, we explored the interaction between these derivatives and DNA. The results reveal promising candidates with strong binding affinities to DNA, substantiated by robust electrostatic interactions. Furthermore, our study sheds light on the ADME and toxicity profiles of these compounds, providing insights into their pharmacological potential. These findings offer valuable insights into the design and development of DNA-binding agents with potential applications in various biomedical fields.

Anahtar Kelimeler

DNA Binding Agents, Computational Methods, ADME Assessment, Toxicity Evaluation, Drug Design, DNA Target, DFT Method

Kaynakça

• [1] W.D. Wilson, R.L. Jones, Intercalating Drugs: DNA Binding and Molecular Pharmacology, (1981) 177–222.
• [2] B.W.S. Robinson, Recent advances in molecular biological techniques and their relevance to pulmonary research, Thorax. 55 (2000) 329–339.
• [3] S. Elleuchi, I. Ortiz de Luzuriaga, Á. Sanchez-Gonzalez, X. Lopez, K. Jarraya, M.J. Calhorda, A. Gil, Computational Studies on the Binding Preferences of Molybdenum(II) Phenanthroline Complexes with Duplex DNA. The Important Role of the Ancillary Ligands, Inorg Chem. 59 (2020) 12711–12721.
• [4] Y.P. Pang, In Silico Drug Discovery: Solving the “Target-rich and Lead-poor” Imbalance Using the Genome-to-drug-lead Paradigm, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 81 (2007) 30–34.
• [5] Y. OKUNO, <i>In silico</i> Drug Discovery Based on the Integration of Bioinformatics and Chemoinformatics, YAKUGAKU ZASSHI. 128 (2008) 1645–1651.
• [6] J. Yoo, D. Winogradoff, A. Aksimentiev, Molecular dynamics simulations of DNA–DNA and DNA–protein interactions, Curr Opin Struct Biol. 64 (2020) 88–96.
• [7] M.R. Karimpour, D. V. Fedorov, A. Tkatchenko, Molecular Interactions Induced by a Static Electric Field in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Electrodynamics, J Phys Chem Lett. 13 (2022) 2197–2204.
• [8] D.A. Gschwend, A.C. Good, I.D. Kuntz, Molecular docking towards drug discovery, Journal of Molecular Recognition. 9 (1996) 175–186.
• [9] X.-J. Lu, Z. Shakked, W.K. Olson, A-form Conformational Motifs in Ligand-bound DNA Structures, J Mol Biol. 300 (2000) 819–840.
• [10] I.S. Haworth, A.H. Elcock, J. Freeman, A. Rodger, W.G. Richards, Sequence Selective Binding to the DNA Major Groove: Tris(1,10-phenanthroline) Metal Complexes Binding to Poly(dG-dC) and Poly(dA-dT), J Biomol Struct Dyn. 9 (1991) 23–44.
• [11] C. Sun, T. Tang, H. Uludağ, J.E. Cuervo, Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA/PEI Complexes: Effect of PEI Branching and Protonation State, Biophys J. 100 (2011) 2754–2763.
• [12] A.G. Cherstvy, Electrostatic interactions in biological DNA-related systems, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 13 (2011) 9942.
• [13] D. Ohlendorf, Electrostatics and flexibility in protein-DNA interactions, Adv Biophys. 20 (1985) 137–151.
• [14] C.U. Murade, G.T. Shubeita, A fluorescent reporter on electrostatic DNA-ligand interactions, Biomed Opt Express. 13 (2022) 159.
• [15] T. Kulikova, P. Padnya, I. Shiabiev, A. Rogov, I. Stoikov, G. Evtugyn, Electrochemical Sensing of Interactions between DNA and Charged Macrocycles, Chemosensors. 9 (2021) 347.
• [16] M.S. Blackledge, C. Melander, Programmable DNA-binding small molecules, Bioorg Med Chem. 21 (2013) 6101–6114.
• [17] T. Prueksaritanont, C. Tang, ADME of Biologics—What Have We Learned from Small Molecules?, AAPS J. 14 (2012) 410–419.
• [18] B.M. Rock, R.S. Foti, Pharmacokinetic and Drug Metabolism Properties of Novel Therapeutic Modalities, Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 47 (2019) 1097–1099.
• [19] F. Anwar, U. Saleem, A.-U. Rehman, B. Ahmad, M. Froeyen, M.U. Mirza, L.Y. Kee, I. Abdullah, S. Ahmad, Toxicity Evaluation of the Naphthalen-2-yl 3,5-Dinitrobenzoate: A Drug Candidate for Alzheimer Disease, Front Pharmacol. 12 (2021).
• [20] R. Bhandari, G. Khanna, A. Kuhad, Pharmacological insight into potential therapeutic agents for the deadly Covid-19 pandemic, Eur J Pharmacol. 890 (2021) 173643.
• [21] K.N. Atuah, D. Hughes, M. Pirmohamed, Clinical Pharmacology, Drug Saf. 27 (2004) 535–554.
• [22] F. De Abreu, F. De Paula, D. Ferreira, V. Nascimento, J. Lopes, A. Santos, M. Santoro, C. Salas, M. Goulart, The Application of DNA-Biosensors and Differential Scanning Calorimetry to the Study of the DNA-Binding Agent Berenil, Sensors. 8 (2008) 1519–1538.
• [23] G. Liu, T. Chen, X. Zhang, X. Ma, H. Shi, Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers, MedComm (Beijing). 3 (2022).
• [24] M. Frisch, G. Trucks, H. Schlegel, G.S.- Wallingford, U. CT, U. 2009, Gaussian 09; Gaussian, Inc, Gaussian, (2016).
• [25] C. Chizallet, S. Lazare, D. Bazer-Bachi, F. Bonnier, V. Lecocq, E. Soyer, A.-A. Quoineaud, N. Bats, Catalysis of Transesterification by a Nonfunctionalized Metal−Organic Framework: Acido-Basicity at the External Surface of ZIF-8 Probed by FTIR and ab Initio Calculations, J Am Chem Soc. 132 (2010) 12365–12377.
• [26] H. Bux, F. Liang, Y. Li, J. Cravillon, M. Wiebcke, J. Caro, Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Membrane with Molecular Sieving Properties by Microwave-Assisted Solvothermal Synthesis, J Am Chem Soc. 131 (2009) 16000–16001.
• [27] S.-L. Li, Q. Xu, Metal–organic frameworks as platforms for clean energy, Energy Environ Sci. 6 (2013) 1656–1683.
• [28] M.C. Buzzeo, R.G. Evans, R.G. Compton, Non-Haloaluminate Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids in Electrochemistry—A Review, ChemPhysChem. 5 (2004) 1106–1120.
• [29] A. Abo-Hamad, M.A. AlSaadi, M. Hayyan, I. Juneidi, M.A. Hashim, Ionic Liquid-Carbon Nanomaterial Hybrids for Electrochemical Sensor Applications: a Review, Electrochim Acta. 193 (2016) 321–343.
• [30] M. Shahsavari, S. Tajik, I. Sheikhshoaie, H. Beitollahi, Fabrication of Nanostructure Electrochemical Sensor Based on the Carbon Paste Electrode (CPE) Modified With Ionic Liquid and Fe3O4/ZIF-67 for Electrocatalytic Sulfamethoxazole Detection, Top Catal. 65 (2022) 577–586.
• [31] O. Trott, A.J. Olson, AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading, J Comput Chem. (2009).
• [32] M. Coll, J. Aymami, G.A. Van der Marel, J.H. Van Boom, A. Rich, A.H.J. Wang, Molecular structure of the netropsin-d(CGCGATATCGCG) complex: DNA conformation in an alternating AT segment, Biochemistry. 28 (1989) 310–320.
• [33] T. Lanez, E. Lanez, A Molecular Docking Study of N-Ferrocenylmethylnitroanilines as Potential Anticancer Drugs, International Journal of Pharmacology, Phytochemistry and Ethnomedicine. 2 (2016) 5–12.
• [34] E. Lanez, L. Bechki, T. Lanez, Computational molecular docking, voltammetric and spectroscopic DNA interaction studies of 9N-(Ferrocenylmethyl)adenine, Chemistry and Chemical Technology. 13 (2019) 11–17.
• [35] BIOVIA, Dassault Systèmes, Discovery Studio Visualiser, v21.1.1.020289, San Diego: Dassault Systèmes, 2020., (n.d.).
• [36] E. Harder, W. Damm, J. Maple, C. Wu, M. Reboul, J.Y. Xiang, L. Wang, D. Lupyan, M.K. Dahlgren, J.L. Knight, J.W. Kaus, D.S. Cerutti, G. Krilov, W.L. Jorgensen, R. Abel, R.A. Friesner, OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins, J Chem Theory Comput. 12 (2016) 281–296.
• [37] G. Magdy, M.A. Shaldam, F. Belal, H. Elmansi, Multi-spectroscopic, thermodynamic, and molecular docking/dynamic approaches for characterization of the binding interaction between calf thymus DNA and palbociclib, Sci Rep. 12 (2022) 14723.
• [38] R. Rohs, Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations, Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (2005) 7048–7057.
• [39] M. Walker, A.J.A. Harvey, A. Sen, C.E.H. Dessent, Performance of M06, M06-2X, and M06-HF Density Functionals for Conformationally Flexible Anionic Clusters: M06 Functionals Perform Better than B3LYP for a Model System with Dispersion and Ionic Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions, J Phys Chem A. 117 (2013) 12590–12600.