Strategic Competence in Virtual Classrooms: An Exploration of Compensation Strategies of Non-native Adult Speakers of English

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 64 - 77, 30.06.2023

Cemil Gökhan Karacan , Tuğçe Kılıç Melisa İnce

Öz

Compensation strategies, a crucial aspect of strategic competence, are playing a decisive role in effective communication and, used in communication by interlocutors to compensate for their deficiency in the target language. The use of compensation strategies is anticipated to vary depending on the context, due to their context-specific nature. Thus, this descriptive study aims to explore the types and frequencies of compensation strategy use by an international group of graduate students. The data were collected through observation of video-recorded class sessions from nine graduate students studying at a foundation university in Turkey. The results showed that the strategies of “keeping the floor,” “self-rephrasing,” and “appeal to authority” were most frequently utilized. Conversely, strategies like word coinage and non-verbal signs were not employed at all. This research offers insight into the compensation strategies used in online settings, where communication dynamics are notably distinct.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Language learning strategies, compensation strategies, compensatory strategy use

Sanal Sınıflarda Stratejik Yeterlilik: Ana Dili İngilizce Olmayan Yetişkin Konuşmacıların Telafi Stratejilerinin Araştırılması

Öz

Stratejik yeterliliğin önemli bir yönü olan telafi stratejileri, etkili iletişimde belirleyici bir rol oynar ve iletişimde muhataplar tarafından hedef dildeki eksikliklerini telafi etmek için kullanılır. Telafi stratejilerinin kullanımının, bağlama özgü doğası nedeniyle bağlama bağlı olarak değişiklik göstermesi beklenmektedir. Bu nedenle, bu betimsel çalışma, uluslararası bir grup yüksek lisans öğrencisi tarafından telafi stratejisi kullanım türlerini ve sıklıklarını keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Veriler, Türkiye’deki bir vakıf üniversitesinde öğrenim gören dokuz yüksek lisans öğrencisinin video kaydı yapılan sınıf oturumlarının gözlemlenmesi yoluyla toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, “sözü tutma”, “kendini yeniden ifade etme” ve “otoriteye başvurma” stratejilerinin en sık kullanılan stratejiler olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna karşılık, kelime uydurma ve sözel olmayan işaretler gibi stratejiler hiç kullanılmamıştır. Bu araştırma, iletişim dinamiklerinin oldukça farklı olduğu çevrimiçi ortamlarda kullanılan telafi stratejileri hakkında fikir vermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dil öğrenme stratejileri, telafi stratejileri, telafi edici strateji kullanımı

Kaynakça

• Bialystok, E. (1983). Some factors in the selection and implementation of communication strategies. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp.100-118). Longman.
• Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
• Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson.
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communication approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1,1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
• Costley, J. (2020). Using cognitive strategies overcomes cognitive load in online learning environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-09 2019-0053
• Demirel, M. (2012). Language learning strategies of undergraduate students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43, 141-153.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/00238333.51997005
• Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in interlanguage communication. In C.
• Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 20-60). Longman.
• Feng, R., & Shirvani, S. (2021). Compensatory strategies adopted by Chinese EFL learners in virtual exchange with native speakers. In M. Satar (Ed.), Virtual exchange: towards digital equity in internationalisation (pp. 63-71). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.53.1290
• Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625
• Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
• Kasper, G., & Kellerman, E. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in communication strategy research. Longman.
• Khairol Anuar, N. A., & Mokhtar, M. I. (2021). Language learning strategies of ESL students in online distance learning environment. Insight Journal, 8(2), 34-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.329967
• Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. (1996). Circumlocution, communication strategies, and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines: An analysis of student discourse. Foreign Language Annals. 2(3), 317-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01245.x
• Margolis, D. P. (2001). Compensation strategies by Korean students. The PAC Journal, 1(1),163-174.
• Mertler, C. (2016). Quantitative research methods. Introduction to Educational Research, 107-143. Sage.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle.
• Pasumbu, H. A., & Macora, Y. D. (2020). Compensation as a strategy in teaching reading to EFL junior high school students. Sintuwu Maroso Journal of English Teaching, 4(1), 39-42.
• Poulisse, N., Bongaerts, T., & Kellerman, E. (1984). On the use of compensatory strategies in second language performance. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 8(1), 70-105. https://doi. org/10.1177/026765838700300204
• Rababah, A. G., & Bulut, D. (2007). Compensatory strategies in Arabic as a second language. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 43(2), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-007-0020-5
• Rababah, G. (2004). Communication problems facing Arab learners of English. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1),180-197.
• Ragab, M. F., El-Marsafy, A. H., & Abdu-Allah, A. M. (2021). The effectiveness of compensation strategies for developing some media translation skills for educational media students at the faculty of specific education. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(1), 4371-4380.
• Rezigalla, A. A. (2020). Observational study designs: Synopsis for selecting an appropriate study design. Cureus, 12(1), 1-6.
• Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
• Syafryadin, S., Martina, F., & Salniwati, S. (2020). Compensation strategies in speaking activities for non-English department students: poor and competent speakers. Journal of English Educators Society, 5(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.819
• Taheri, A. A., & Davoudi, M. (2016). The use of compensation strategies in the Iranian EFL learners’ speaking and its relationship with their foreign language proficiency. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 165-179.
• Tarone, E. (1977). Conscious Communication Strategies in Interlanguage: A Progress Report, in Brown, H. Douglas, Yorio, Carlos A. and Crymes, Ruth H. (Eds.). On TESOL’77 Teaching and learning English as a second language’ Trends in Resource and Practice, 194-201.
• Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreign talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30, 417-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00326.x
• Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 142- 164.
• Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (Eds.). (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice Hall. Yılmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 682-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.084