BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ YÖNTEMİNİN FASON İŞLETME SEÇİMİNDE KULLANILMASI

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3, 1 - 6, 01.12.2006

Mücella Güner

Öz

amaçların gerçekleştirilmesi yönünde alternatif eylem planlarından birini seçme sürecidir. Günümüzün hızla değişen ve globalleşen çevresi, başarılı bir işletmenin zengin bir karar verme sürecine sahip olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Bu, bilginin sadece toplanıp işlenmesi değil, aynı zamanda gelişmiş karar tekniklerinin kullanılması anlamına gelmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi kullanılarak fason işletme seçimi uygulaması yapılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi Expert Choice Yazılımı karar verme kıyaslama fason işletme

Kaynakça

  • 1. ALBAYRAKOĞLU,M. Murat (1996), “Justification Of New Manufacturing Technolojy: A Strategic Approach Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process”, Production & Inventory Management Journal, First Quarter, pp. 71-76.
  • 2. HARKER, Patrick T. And Luis G. Vargas (1987), “The Theory Of Ratio Skale Estimation: Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, Vol. 33, No: 11, Nov.,p p. 1383-1403.
  • 3. HUIZINGH, Eeelko K.R.E. and Hhans C.J. Vrolijik, (1997) “Extending the Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol. 31, No: 1, pp. 29-39.
  • 4. JAIN, Bharat A. And Barin N. Nag, (1996) “A Decision-Support Model For Investment Decisions Iİn New Ventures”, European Journal Of Operation Research, No:90, pp. 473-486.
  • 5. MOKHTAR, Alireza (2003), Applying AHP Methodology to Select The Best Rapid Protoyyping Technıque, 32nd International Conference on Computers and Industrıal Engıneerıng, Ireland,pp.62-67
  • 6. NARASIMHAN, R. (1983), “An Analytical Aproach To Supplier Selection”, Journal Of Purchasing And Materials, Vol. 19, No: 1, pp. 27-32.
  • 7. PARTOVI, Fariborz Y. And Walter E. Hopton (1994), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process As Applied Two Types Of Inventory Problems”, Production & Inventory Management Journal, First Quarter, pp. 13-19.
  • 8. SAATY, Thomas L. (1986), “Axiomatic Foundation Of The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, Vol. 32, No: 7, July, pp. 841-855.
  • 9. SAATY, Thomas L. (1990), How To Make A Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal Of Operation Research, No:48, pp. 9-26.
  • 10. SAATY, Thomas L. (1986), How To Make A Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Interfaces, 24:6 Nov.-Dec., pp. 19-43.
  • 11. VARGAS, Luis G. (1990), “An Overview Of The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications”, European Journal Of Operation Research, No:48, pp.2-8.
  • 12. Expert Choice Software Tutorials (2000), Expert Choice Inc., Pittsburgh.

USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR CHOOSING THE SUB-CONTRACTOR

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3, 1 - 6, 01.12.2006

Mücella Güner

Öz

Decision making is a process of choosing one of a number of alternative plans of action as a way of achieving a target or goal.In todays rapidly changing and globalising environment, succesful business enterprises must have a powerful procedure for decision making . This includes not only harvesting and processing of information but also using special decision making techniques. This article deals with choosing the right sub-contractor using AHY

Anahtar Kelimeler

Analytic Hierarchy Process Expert Choice Software decision making comparing sub-contractor

Kaynakça

  • 1. ALBAYRAKOĞLU,M. Murat (1996), “Justification Of New Manufacturing Technolojy: A Strategic Approach Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process”, Production & Inventory Management Journal, First Quarter, pp. 71-76.
  • 2. HARKER, Patrick T. And Luis G. Vargas (1987), “The Theory Of Ratio Skale Estimation: Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, Vol. 33, No: 11, Nov.,p p. 1383-1403.
  • 3. HUIZINGH, Eeelko K.R.E. and Hhans C.J. Vrolijik, (1997) “Extending the Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol. 31, No: 1, pp. 29-39.
  • 4. JAIN, Bharat A. And Barin N. Nag, (1996) “A Decision-Support Model For Investment Decisions Iİn New Ventures”, European Journal Of Operation Research, No:90, pp. 473-486.
  • 5. MOKHTAR, Alireza (2003), Applying AHP Methodology to Select The Best Rapid Protoyyping Technıque, 32nd International Conference on Computers and Industrıal Engıneerıng, Ireland,pp.62-67
  • 6. NARASIMHAN, R. (1983), “An Analytical Aproach To Supplier Selection”, Journal Of Purchasing And Materials, Vol. 19, No: 1, pp. 27-32.
  • 7. PARTOVI, Fariborz Y. And Walter E. Hopton (1994), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process As Applied Two Types Of Inventory Problems”, Production & Inventory Management Journal, First Quarter, pp. 13-19.
  • 8. SAATY, Thomas L. (1986), “Axiomatic Foundation Of The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, Vol. 32, No: 7, July, pp. 841-855.
  • 9. SAATY, Thomas L. (1990), How To Make A Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal Of Operation Research, No:48, pp. 9-26.
  • 10. SAATY, Thomas L. (1986), How To Make A Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Interfaces, 24:6 Nov.-Dec., pp. 19-43.
  • 11. VARGAS, Luis G. (1990), “An Overview Of The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications”, European Journal Of Operation Research, No:48, pp.2-8.
  • 12. Expert Choice Software Tutorials (2000), Expert Choice Inc., Pittsburgh.
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA87JN22NM
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mücella Güner Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2006
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Aralık 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Güner, M. (2006). USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR CHOOSING THE SUB-CONTRACTOR. Textile and Apparel, 16(3), 1-6.

No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated in any forms or by any means without prior written permission of the Editorial Board. The views and opinions expressed here in the articles are those of the authors and are not the views of Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon and Textile and Apparel Research-Application Center.