HAM VE GERİ DÖNÜŞÜM POLİPROPİLEN POLİMERLERİNİN KARIŞIMINDAN ELDE EDİLEN MONOFİLAMENTLER

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3, 181 - 188, 01.12.2009

Diana Gregor-svetec Barbara Tısler-korljan Mirjam Leskovsek Franci Sluga

Öz

Çalışmada, Slovenya’da toplanan ambalaj teleflerinden elde edilen %100 geri dönüşüm polipropilen liflerinin kullanımı ele alınmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı , eriyikten monofilament lif çekiminin optimizasyonunun sağlanması ve ham, geri dönüşüm polipropilenpolimeri ve bunların karışımlarından üretilen liflerin özelliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.Monofilamentler; %100 ham polimer, %85 ham -%15 geri dönüşüm polimeri ve %50 ham -%50 geri dönüşüm polimerlerinden üretilmişlerdir. Ham polimer içerisine geri kazanım polimerinin eklenmesinin kristaliniteyi ve monofilamentlerin mukavemetlerini de etkileyen ortalama moleküler oryantasyonu düşürdüğü bilinmektedir. Bir miktar polietilen parçalar da içeren geri dönüşüm polimerinin, ham polimer ile karışabilirliğinin düşük olması sebebiyle karışım polimerinden elde edilen liflerin gözenekli, kolay kırılır ve sert olduğu, düşük kopma mukavemeti gösterdiği görülmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polipropilen, Geri dönüşüm polimeri, Eriyikten lif çekimi, Mukavemet özellikleri, Monofilament

MONOFILAMENTS PRODUCED BY BLENDING VIRGIN WITH RECYCLED POLYPROPYLENE

Öz

Our research addresses the use of 100% recycled polypropylene from separately collected packaging waste in Slovenia for themanufacture of monofilaments. The goal of this research was to optimise the melt spinning of monofilaments and to compare theproperties of monofilaments obtained from the virgin polymer and from blends of virgin and recycled polymer. Monofilaments werespun from the pure virgin polymer, from a blend of 85% virgin and 15% recycled polymer, and from 50% virgin and 50% recycledpolymer. It was established that the addition of the recycled polymer to the virgin polymer lowered the crystallinity and averagemolecular orientation of as-spun monofilaments, which influenced the tensile properties of the monofilaments. Because of the poormiscibility of the virgin with the recycled polypropylene, which also contained some fractions of polyethylene, the as-spunmonofilaments were porous, brittle and rigid, and had a high tendency to break

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polypropylene, Recycled polymer, Melt spinning, Tensile properties, Monofilament

Kaynakça

• 1. Radonjiþ G., 2008, “Embalaža in varstvo okolja. Zahteve, smernice in podjetniške priložnosti”, Založba Pivec, Maribor.
• 2. Paula, M. M., Medeiros Rodrigues, F. B. B., Bernardin, A. M., Fiori, M. A. and Angioletto, E., 2005, “Characterization of aluminized polyethylene blends via mechanical recycling”, Materials Science Engineering, Vol: A 403, pp: 37-41.
• 3. Luzuriaga, S., KováĜová, J. and Fortelný, I., 2006 “Degradation of pre-aged polymers exposed to simulated recycling: Properties and thermal stability”, Polymer Degradation Stability, Vol: 91 pp: 1226-1232.
• 4. Strapasson, R., Amico, S. C., Pereira, M. F. R. and Sydenstricker, T. H. D., 2005, “Tensile and impact behaviour of polypropylene/low density polyethylene blends”, Polymer Testing, Vol: 24, pp: 468-473.
• 5. Ambrose, C. A., Hooper, R., Potter, A. K. and Singh, M. M., 2002, “Diversion from landfill: quality products from valuable plastics”, Resources, Conservation Recycling, Vol: 36, pp: 309-318.
• 6. Bertin, S. and Robin, J.J., 2002, “Study and characterization of virgin and recycled LDPE/PP blends”, European Polymer Journal, Vol: 38, pp: 2255-2264.
• 7. Cavalieri, P. and Padella, F., 2002, ”Development of composite materials by mechanochemical treatment of post-consumer plastic waste”, Waste Management, Vol: 22, pp: 913-916.
• 8. Kostadinova Loultcheva, M., Proietto, M., Jilov, N. and La Mantia, F.P. 1997, “Recycling of hifh density polyethylene containers”, Polymer Degradation and Stability, Vol: 57, pp: 78-81.
• 9. Tišler-Korljan, B. and Gregor-Svetec, D., 2008, “Characteristics of monofilaments made from recycled polypropylene”, In: Dragþeviü, Z. (ed.), 4th ITC&DC Conference. Magic world of textiles: book of proceedings. Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, pp: 168-172.
• 10. Broda, J., 2003, “Morphology of the noncoloured and coloured polypropylene fibres”, Polymer, Vol: 44, pp: 1619-1629.
• 11. Socrates, G., 2004, “Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies”, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
• 12. “Plastic recycling” 2009, Waste online. http://www.wasteonline.org/uk
• 13. “Revised final report Cradle-to-gate life cycle inventory of nine plastic resins and two polyurethane precursos”, 2007, Franklin Associates. A division of eastern research group, inc., Prairie Village, Kansas.
• 14. Noda, R., Komatsu, M., Sumi, E. And Kasakuta, T., 2001, ”Evaluation of material recycling for plastics:environmental aspect”, J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, Vol: 3, pp: 118-125