KİTOSANIN TEKSTİL SANAYİİNDE ANTİMİKROBİYAL MADDE OLARAK KULLANIMININ ARAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2008, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 94 - 102, 01.12.2008

Aslı Demir Tülin Öktem Necdet Seventekin

Abstract

Dünyada çapında, büyük miktarda yengeç ve karides gibi, su ürünlerinin kabukları değerlendirilmeden çevreye atılmaktadır. Günümüz artan çevre yasaları ve atıkların yeniden değerlendirilmelerinin gündeme gelmesiyle birlikte, bu kabuklardan yeni ürünler elde edilmeye başlanmıştır. Bu ürünlerin başında kitin gelmektedir. Kitin, dünyada selülozdan sonra ikinci en yaygın biyopolimerdir. Kitinin deasetilasyonu sonucunda başlıca türevi olan kitosan elde edilmektedir. Kitin ve kitosan kimyası üzerine yapılan araştırmalarla birlikte uygulama alanları da paralel olarak artış göstermektedir. Kitosan, birçok sektör gibi tekstil sanayinde de antimikrobiyal madde, lif eldesi, pamuk boyama, yün boyama ve keçeleşmezlik kazandırma gibi birçok alanda geniş kullanım alanı bulmuştur. Bu çalışmada, kitosanın tek başına ve farklı konsantrasyonlarda çapraz bağlayıcı ile çeşitli fiksaj koşullarında antimikrobiyal etkinliği ve yıkama dayanımları incelenmiştir. Deneme sonuçlarından, DMDHEU ve kitosan kombinasyonunun çoklu yıkamalara karşı, tek başına kitosan kullanımına kıyasla çok daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği görülmüştür

Keywords

Kitosan, Kitin, Antimikrobiyal madde, Pamuk

INVESTIGATION OF THE USAGE OF CHITOSAN AS AN ANTIMICROBIAL AGENT IN TEXTILE INDUSTRY

Abstract

Huge amount of crab and shrimp shells have been abandoned as wastes worldwide. These wastes are reprocessed as a result of increased environmental laws and new products have been produced from these shells. Chitin has become the most preferred form of them and it is also the most abundant biopolymer after cellulose in nature. Chitosan, the main derivative of chitin, is obtained by deacetylation of chitin. Application areas of chitin and chitosan have been increasing together with the researches made on them. Like most of other industries, Chitosan has the most common application possibilities in textile industry such as antimicrobial agent, spinning, cotton, wool dyeing and shrink proofing of wool fibers. In present study, the effect of chitosan and crosslinking agent at different concentrations on antibacterial efficiency and washing durability were investigated. The combination of DMDHEU and chitosan was found to give better results against multiple washings than that of chitosan alone

Keywords

Chitosan, Chitin, Antimicrobial agent, Cotton

References

• 1. Duman, S.S, Şenel, S., 2004, “Kitosan ve Veteriner Alandaki Uygulamaları”, Veteriner Cerrahi Dergisi, 10 (3-4), p. 62-72
• 2. Shahidi, F., Arachchi J.K.V., Jeon, Y.J., 1999, “Food Applications of chitin and chitosans”, Trends in Food Science &Technology , Vol. 10, pp. 37-51.
• 3. Zheng, L.H., Zhu J.F., 2003, “Study on Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan with Different Molecular Weights”, Carbohydrate Polymers, 54, pp. 527- 530.
• 4. Helander, I.M., Nırmiaho, L., Ahvenainen S.,2001, “Chitosan Disrupts The Barrier Properties of The Outer Membrane of Gram-Negative Bacteria”, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 71, pp. 235-244.
• 5. Liu, H., Du, Y., Xiaohui, W., Sun, L., 2004, “Chitosan kills bacteria through cell-membrane damage, International Journal of Microbiology”, 95, pp. 147- 155.
• 6. Xiao, F.L., Yun, L.G., Dong, Z.Y., Zhi, L., 2001, “Antimicrobial Action of Chitosan and Carboxymethylated Chitosan”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 29, pp. 1324-1335.
• 7. Liu, X.D., Nishi N., Tokura S., Sakairi N., 2001, “Chitosan Coated Cotton Fiber: Preperation and Physical Properties”, Carbohydrate Polymers, 44, pp. 233-238
• 8. Shimojoh, M., Masaki, K.; Kurita, K. Fukushima, K., 1996, “Bacterial effects of chitosan from squid pens on oral Streptococci.” Nippon Nogeik. Kaishi 1996, 70 (7), pp.787–792.
• 9. Yalpani, M., Johnson, F., Robinson, L.E., 1992, “Antimicrobial activity of some chitosan derivatives”, Advances in Chitin and Chitosan” pp.543–548.
• 10. Sudardshan,N.R., Hoover, D.G., Knorr,D., 1992, “Antibacterial action of chitosan”, Food Biotechnology, 6 (3), pp.257–272.
• 11. Sang-Hoon Lim. Samuel M. H., 2003, “Review of Chitosan and Its Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents and Their Uses as Textile Chemicals”, Polymer Reviews, Volume 43, Issue 2 January, pp. 223 – 269
• 12. Demir A., 2007, “Tekstil Terbiyesinde Chitin Ve Chitosanın Kullanım Olanaklarının Araştırılması”, Doktora Tezi, İzmir
• 13. Chung, Y., Su, Y., Chen, C., Jia, G., 2004, “Relationship between antibacterial activity of chitosan and surface characteristics of cell wall”, Acta Pharmacol, July, 25, 7, pp. 932-936.
• 14. Chen, C.S., Su, J.C., Tsai, G.J., 1998, “Antimicrobial effect and physical properties of sulfonbenzoyl chitosan”, Advances in Chitin Science, Vol. III, pp. 278–282.
• 15. Lim, S.H.N. 2002, “Synthesis of a Fiber-Reactive Chitosan Derivative and Its Application to Cotton Fabric as an Antimicrobial Finish and a DyeingImproving Agent”, Ph.D: Thesis,
• 16. El-Tahlawy K.F., El-bendary M.A., Elhendawy A.G., Hudson S.M., 2005, “The Antimicrobial Activity of Cotton Fabrics Treated with Different Crosslinking Agents and Chitosan”, Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 60, pp. 421-430.
• 17. Fang, S.W., Li, C.F., Shih, D.Y.C., 1994, “Antifungal activity of chitosan and its preservative effect on low-sugar candied kumquat”., J. Food Protect., 56 (2), pp.136–140.
• 18. Hwang, J.K., Kim, H-J., Yoon, S.J., Pyun, Y.R., 1998, “Bactericidal activity of chitosan on E. Coli”., Advances in Chitin Science, Vol. III, pp. 340–344.
• 19. El-Tahlawy, Kh.F., 1999, “Utilization of citric acid-chitosan-sodium ypophosphite system for effecting concurrent dyeing and finishing” Colourage, 46 (5), pp. 21–26,34.
• 20. Fahmy H.M., Mohamed Z. E., AboShosha M. H., Ibrahim N. A., 2004, “Thermosole Cross-Linking of Chitosan and Utilization in the Removal of Some Dyes from Aqueous Solution”, Polymer– Plastics Technology And Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 445–462.
• 21. Singh, A., Narvi, S., Dutta P.K., Pandey, N.D., 2006, External stimuli response on a novel chitosan hydrogel crosslinked with formaldehyde”, Bulletin of Materail Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 233–238