SKIN-FABRIC FRICTION AND OTHER PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOCKS FABRICS PRODUCED FROM CELLULOSIC FIBERS

Year 2018, Volume: 28 Issue: 3, 213 - 220, 01.10.2018

Sibel Kaplan , Ceren Karaman

Abstract

Skin friction and some performance characteristics of single jersey fabrics produced from cotton (combed, carded and rotor) and regenerated cellulosic fiber (viscose, bamboo, modal, micromodal, Tencel®, Tencel LF® and some blends) yarns were investigated by surface friction, bursting strength, abrasion and pilling resistance tests. Daily or functional socks were the intended end use of the selected materials. According to the results, cotton, 48/52% cotton/modal and Tencel® fabrics have higher bursting strength. Pilling and abrasion resistances are the highest for also 48/52% cotton/modal fabric. For skin friction which is crucial for socks within shoes, rotor viscose, 48/52% cotton/modal and micromodal have smoother surfaces than modal and Tencel® for both kinetic and static friction coefficients. It means that these materials create less injuries on sweaty skin during an activity. It is thought that, results obtained for cotton and different regenerated cellulosic fabrics are valid also for all next-to-skin garments. 

Keywords

Skin friction, socks, fiber type, cellulosic, pilling, abrasion, bursting strength

References

• 1. Bertaux, E., Derler, S., Rossi, R. M., Zeng, X., Koehl, L. And Ventenat, V., 2010, “Textile, Physiological and Sensorial Parameters in Sock Comfort”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 80 (17), pp: 1803-1810.
• 2. Baussan, E., Bueno, M. A., Rossi, R. M. and Derler, S., 2010, Experiments and modelling of skin-knitted fabric friction“, Wear, Vol: 268(9),pp:1103-1110.
• 3. Gwosdow, A.R., Stevens, J.C., Berglund, L.G. and Stolwijk, J. A. J., 1986, “Skin Friction and Fabric Sensations in Neutral and Warm Environments”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 56 (9), pp: 574-580.
• 4. Herring, K.M. and Richie Jr, D.H., 1990, “Friction blisters and sock fiber composition. A double-blind study”, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol: 80 (2), pp: 63-71.
• 5. Tasron, D. N., Thurston, T. J., & Carré, M. J. 2015, Frictional behaviour of running sock textiles against plantar skin“, Procedia Engineering, Vol: 112, pp: 110-115.
• 6. Van Amber, R. R., Lowe, B. J., Niven, B. E., Laing, R. M., Wilson, C. A., & Collie, S., 2015. “The Effect of Fiber Type, Yarn Structure and Fabric Structure on the Frictional Characteristics of Sock Fabrics”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 85(2), pp: 115-127.
• 7. Kenins, P., 1994, “Influence of Fiber Type and Moisture on Measured Fabric-to-Skin Friction”, Textile Research Journal, Vol: 64(12), pp: 722-728.
• 8. Baussan, E., Bueno, M. A., Rossi, R. M., & Derler, S. 2013, “Analysis of current running sock structures with regard to blister prevention“, Textile Research Journal, Vol:83(8), pp: 836-848.
• 9. Bogerd, C.P., Rechsteiner, I., Wüst, B., Rossi, R.M. and Brühwiler, P.A.,B.C. and Brühwiler, P.A., 2011, “The Effect of Two Sock Fabrics on Physiological Parameters Associated with Blister Incidence: A Laboratory Study“, Annual Occupational Hygiene, Vol: 55 (5), pp: 510-518.
• 10. Hes, L., Oglakcioğlu, N., Marmarali, A., Özdil, N., & Lima, M. 2008, “The Effect Of Moisture On Friction Coefficient Of Elastic Knitted Fabrics“, Journal of Textile & Apparel/Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Vol: 18(3), pp: 206-210.
• 11. Werd, M. B., & Knight, E. L. 2010, “Athletic footwear and orthoses in sports medicine” P. R. Langer (Ed.), Springer, New York, pp: 98.
• 12. Badr, A. A., Hassanin, A., Moursey, M., 2016, “Influence of Tencel/cotton blends on knitted fabric performance”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol: 55(3), pp: 24392447.
• 13. Erdumlu, N. and Ozipek, B., 2008, “Investigation of Regenerated Bamboo Fibre and Yarn Characteristics”, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol: 16, No: 4 (69), pp: 43-47.
• 14. Dirgar, E., 2017, The Performance Properties of the Fabrics Produced From Cupro and Some Other Regenerated Cellulose Fibers., Vol: 27(2), pp: 139-144.
• 15. Cimilli, S.,, 2007, “Modelling Of Heat Transfer Behaviors Of Socks Made From New Fibers Using Finite Element Method”, Unpublished master’s thesis, 124 p., Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
• 16. Kayseri, G. O., Bozdogan, F., and Hes, L., 2010, “Performance properties of regenerated cellulose fibers”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Vol: 20(3), pp: 208-212.
• 17. Dündar, E., 2008, “Performance Comparison of Knitted Fabrics Produced from Different Cellulosic Yarns”, Unpublished master’s thesis, 76p., Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
• 18. Mather, R. R., & Wardman, R. H., 2015, “The chemistry of textile fibres”. Royal Society of Chemistry, Second Edition, Cambridge, UK, pp: 133-134.
• 19. https://tencel.com/general
• 20. Okur A., 2002, “A Study on the Frictional Properties of Plain-knitted Cotton Fabrics”, Textile Asia, Vol: 33(8), pp: 32–34.
• 21. Kaplan, S. and Okur, A., 2009, “Determination of Coolness and Dampness Sensations Created by Fabrics by Forearm Test and Fabric Measurements”, Journal of Sensory Studies, Vol: 24(4), pp: 479-497.
• 22. Avcı, H., 2007, “Comfort Properties of Socks Produced from New Generation Fibers”, Unpublished master’s thesis, 75p., Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
• 23. Periyasamy, A. P., Khanum, R., 2012, “Effect of fibrillation on pilling tendency of Lyocell fiber”, https://www.textiletoday.com.bd/effect-of-fibrillation-on-pillingtendency-of-lyocell-fiber/.
• 24. Ozbagcı, Ö., 2008, “Physical and Dimensional Properties of Some Single Jersey Fabrics Produced From Cotton and Some Regenerated Fibers”, unpublished master’s thesis, 160p., Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
• 25. Özdil, N., Kayseri, G. Ö., Mengüç, G. S., 2012, “Analysis of abrasion characteristics in textiles“, in Abrasion resistance of materials, InTech, pp: 123.