In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm

Murat Göztaş; Mehmet Çunkaş; Mehmet Akif Şahman

doi:10.5152/tepes.2025.25001

In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm

Abstract

This paper investigates the in-situ efficiency prediction of induction motors using four optimization algorithms: genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), whale optimization algorithm (WOA), and red fox optimization algorithm (RFO). Experimental evaluations were conducted on three induction motors with power ratings of 22 kW, 30 kW, and 132 kW under varying load conditions (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). The performance of the algorithms is tested not only under full load conditions but also under partial load conditions. This is an important requirement, given that motors usually do not run at full load in real-world applications. The algorithms were assessed based on their convergence behavior, accuracy, and experimentally measured efficiency values. The results revealed that the performance of the algorithms varies depending on the motor power and load level. While WOA is more successful at medium and high loads, PSO stands out at low loads. While GA provides higher accuracy, especially at full load on an motor, the performance of RFO varies according to the load level. In general, the performance of WOA and RFO stands out to some extent. The study demonstrates the advantages of non-intrusive methods for motor efficiency prediction that eliminate the need for direct shaft power measurements. It also offers practical benefits in industrial applications, such as reducing downtime and improving energy management.

Keywords

References

1. G. K. Esen, and E. Özdemir, “A new field test method for determining energy efficiency of induction motor,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 3170–3179, 2017.
2. J. Rengifo, E. Albanez, J. Benzaquen, A. Bueno, and J. M. Aller, “Full-load range in-situ efficiency estimation method for induction motors using only a direct start-up,” in International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM). New York, United States of America: IEEE, 2018.
3. A. G. Siraki, and P. Pillay, “Comparison of two methods for full-load in situ induction motor efficiency estimation from field testing in the presence of over/undervoltages and unbalanced supplies,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1911–1921, 2012.
4. V. S. Santos, J. J. Cabello Eras, A. Sagastume Gutierrez, and M. J. Cabello Ulloa, “Assessment of the energy efficiency estimation methods on induction motors considering real-time monitoring,” Measurement, vol. 136, pp. 237–247, 2019.
5. G. F. V. Amaral, J. M. R. Baccarini, F. C. R. Coelho, and L. M. Rabelo, “A high precision method for induction machine parameters estimation from manufacturer data,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1226–1233, 2021.
6. J. R. Holmquist, J. A. Rooks, and M. E. Richter, “Practical approach for determining motor efficiency in the field using calculated and measured values,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 242–248, 2004.
7. S. John, D. John, and O. MITCHELL, “Comparison of induction motor field efficiency evaluation method,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 34, no. 1, 1998.
8. B. Lu, T. G. Habetler, and R. G. Harley, “A survey of efficiency-estimation methods for in-service induction motors,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 924–933, 2006.

9. J. Kueck et al., Assessment of Methods for Estimating Motor Efficiency and Load under Field Conditions. OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY, 1996.
10. B. Lu, T. G. Habetler, and R. G. Harley, “A nonintrusive and in-service motor-efficiency estimation method using air-gap torque with considerations of condition monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1666–1674, 2008.
11. G. S. Grewal, and B. Singh, “Efficiency determination of in-service induction machines using gravitational search optimization,” Measurement, vol. 118, pp. 156–163, 2018.
12. P. Pillay, V. Levin, P. Otaduy, and J. Kueck, “In-situ induction motor efficiency determination using the genetic algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 326–333, 1998.
13. V. P. Sakthivel, R. Bhuvaneswari, and S. Subramanian, “Immune algorithm based non-intrusive efficiency determination for in-situ induction motor,” Aust. J. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2010.
14. M. Çunkaş, and T. Sağ, “Efficiency determination of induction motors using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 255–261, 2010.
15. R. Thangaraj, M. Pant, C. T. Raj, and A. K. Nagar, “In situ efficiency determination of induction motor: A comparative study of evolutionary techniques,” Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 116–140, 2011.
16. M. Arslan, M. Çunkaş, and T. Sağ, “Determination of induction motor parameters with differential evolution algorithm,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1995–2004, 2012.
17. S. A. Chandrakanth et al., “In-situ efficiency determination of induction motor through parameter estimation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving (SocProS 2011), vol. 1. Berlin: Springer, 2011, p. 2012.
18. K. Chayakulkheeree, V. Hengsritawat, and P. Nantivatana, “Particle swarm optimization based equivalent circuit estimation for on-service three-phase induction motor efficiency assessment,” Eng. J., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 101–110, 2017.
19. M. Al-Badri, P. Pillay, and P. Angers, “A novel in situ efficiency estimation algorithm for three-phase IM using GA, IEEE method F1 calculations, and pretested motor data,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1092–1102, 2015.
20. M. G. Bijan, and P. Pillay, “Efficiency estimation of the induction machine by particle swarm optimization using rapid test data with range constraints,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 5883–5894, 2019.
21. M. N. Diarra, Y. Yao, Z. Li, M. Niasse, Y. Li, and H. Zhao, “In-situ efficiency estimation of induction motors based on Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization-Trust Region Algorithm (QPSO-TRA),” Energies, vol. 15, no. 13, p. 4905, 2022.
22. P. Rajesh, F. H. Shajin, and N. V. Anand, “An efficient estimation model for induction motor using BMO-RBFNN technique,” Process Integr. Optim. Sustain., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 777–792, 2021.
23. R. K. Hamad, and T. A. Rashid, “GOOSE algorithm: A powerful optimization tool for real-world engineering challenges and beyond,” Evolving Syst., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1249–1274, 2024.
24. M. Ghasemi, M. Zare, P. Trojovský, R. V. Rao, E. Trojovská, and V. Kandasamy, “Optimization based on the smart behavior of plants with its engineering applications: Ivy algorithm,” Knowl. Based Syst., vol. 295, p. 111850, 2024.
25. Z. Benmamoun, K. Khlie, G. Bektemyssova, M. Dehghani, and Y. Gherabi, “Bobcat Optimization Algorithm: An effective bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving supply chain optimization problems,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 20099, 2024.
26. J. McCall, “Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimisation,” J. Comp. Appl. Math., vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 205–222, 2005.
27. J. Kennedy, and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of ICNN'95-International conference on neural networks. New York, United States of America: ieee, 1995, pp. 1942–1948.
28. W. Tang, L. Cao, Y. Chen, B. Chen, and Y. Yue, “Solving engineering optimization problems based on multi-strategy particle swarm optimization hybrid dandelion optimization algorithm,” Biomimetics (Basel), vol. 9, no. 5, p. 298, 2024.
29. S. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “The whale optimization algorithm,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 95, pp. 51–67, 2016.
30. L. Deng, and S. Liu, “Deficiencies of the whale optimization algorithm and its validation method,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 237, p. 121544, 2024.
31. A. M. Ahmed et al., “Balancing exploration and exploitation phases in whale optimization algorithm: An insightful and empirical analysis,” in Handbook of Whale Optimization Algorithm. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2024, pp. 149–156.
32. X.-S. Yang, and X. He, “Nature-inspired optimization algorithms in engineering: Overview and applications,” in Nature-Inspired Computation in Engineering, X.-S. Yang, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 1–20.
33. C. D. Soulsbury, P. J. Baker, G. Iossa, and S. Harris, “Fitness costs of dispersal in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes),” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1289–1298, 2008.
34. H. Mohammed, and T. Rashid, “FOX: A FOX-inspired optimization algorithm,” Appl. Intell., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1030–1050, 2023.
35. A. G. Siraki, P. Pillay, and P. Angers, “Full load efficiency estimation of refurbished induction machines from no-load testing,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 317–326, 2013.
36. S. C. E. R. L. Mantilla, “How the efficiency of induction motor is measured?,” Energy, vol. 15, p. 15, 2008.
37. K. D. Hurst, and T. G. Habetler, “A comparison of spectrum estimation techniques for sensorless speed detection in induction machines,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 898–905, 1997.
38. Society, P. E., IEEE Standard Test Procedure for Polyphase Induction Motors and Generators. New York, NY: IEEE, 2004.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Machines and Drives

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Murat Göztaş
0000-0002-1131-7500
Türkiye

Mehmet Çunkaş ^*
0000-0002-5031-7618
Türkiye

Mehmet Akif Şahman
0000-0002-1718-3777
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 16, 2025

Submission Date

January 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 4, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 5 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2025.25001

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA87RU38MF

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Göztaş, M., Çunkaş, M., & Şahman, M. A. (2025). In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 5(2), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2025.25001

AMA

1.Göztaş M, Çunkaş M, Şahman MA. In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm. TEPES. 2025;5(2):114-124. doi:10.5152/tepes.2025.25001

Chicago

Göztaş, Murat, Mehmet Çunkaş, and Mehmet Akif Şahman. 2025. “In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 5 (2): 114-24. https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2025.25001.

EndNote

Göztaş M, Çunkaş M, Şahman MA (June 1, 2025) In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 5 2 114–124.

IEEE

[1]M. Göztaş, M. Çunkaş, and M. A. Şahman, “In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm”, TEPES, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 114–124, June 2025, doi: 10.5152/tepes.2025.25001.

ISNAD

Göztaş, Murat - Çunkaş, Mehmet - Şahman, Mehmet Akif. “In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 5/2 (June 1, 2025): 114-124. https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2025.25001.

JAMA

1.Göztaş M, Çunkaş M, Şahman MA. In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm. TEPES. 2025;5:114–124.

MLA

Göztaş, Murat, et al. “In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 5, no. 2, June 2025, pp. 114-2, doi:10.5152/tepes.2025.25001.

Vancouver

1.Murat Göztaş, Mehmet Çunkaş, Mehmet Akif Şahman. In-Situ Efficiency Estimation of Induction Motors Using Whale Optimization Algorithm. TEPES. 2025 Jun. 1;5(2):114-2. doi:10.5152/tepes.2025.25001