An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations

Didar Ciftci; Arda Akyıldız; Batı Eren Ergun; Mehmet Onur Gulbahce

doi:10.5152/tepes.2024.24019

An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of coupled and uncoupled inductors within an interleaved boost converter. The study includes the derivation of steady-state variables and magnetic equations for each inductor configuration. To mitigate input current ripple issues in the conventional boost converter, interleaving techniques are employed. Additionally, the volume concerns associated with interleaving are addressed through the application of inductor cou- pling techniques. An interleaved boost converter topology with an input voltage of 200 V, an output voltage of 400 V, and a power rating of 3700 W has been designed with different inductor configurations. The advantages and disadvantages of each configuration have been comparatively analyzed. The utilization of coupled inductors results in a more compact, efficient, and cost-effective design when contrasted with the uncoupled configuration. The magnetic flux densities of each inductor configuration are compared to evaluate performance outcomes. To ensure accurate core loss calculations in ANSYS Maxwell, core loss coef- ficients provided by the manufacturer were not directly used. Instead, new coefficients were derived by generating data sets at five different frequencies. The finite element method (FEM) is used for the analysis of the proposed inductors, and analytical loss calculations are validated.

Keywords

References

1. D. J. S. Newlin, R. Ramalakshmi, and S. Rajasekaran, “A performance comparison of interleaved boost converter and conventional boost con- verter for renewable energy application,” in International Conference on Green High Performance Computing (ICGHPC), vol. 2013, 2013, pp. 1–6.
2. P. W. Lee, Y. S. Lee, D. K. W. Cheng, and X. C. Liu, “Steady state analysis of an interleaved boost converter with coupled inductors,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 787–795, 2000.
3. B. A. Miwa, D. M. Otten, and M. E. Schlecht, “High efficiency power factor correction using interleaving techniques,” in APEC’92 Seventh Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 1992, pp. 557–568.
4. N. Coruh, S. Urgun, T. Erfidan, and S. Ozturk, “A simple and efficient implementation of interleaved boost converter,” in 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, Vol. 2011, 2011, pp. 2364–2368.
5. F. C. Lee, S. Wang, P. Kong, C. Wang, and D. Fu, “Power architecture design with improved system efficiency, EMI, and power density,” in IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Vol. 2008, 2008, pp. 4131–4137.
6. L. Balogh, and R. Redl, “Power-factor correction with interleaved boost converters in continuous-inductor-current mode,” in Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 1993, pp. 168–174.
7. S. Nahar, and M. B. Uddin, “Analysis of the performance of interleaved boost converter,” in 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineer- ing and Information & Communication Technology (iCEEiCT), vol. 2018, 2018, pp. 547–551.
8. J. C. Rosas-Caro, J. E. Valdez-Resendiz, J. C. Mayo-Maldonado, R. Salas- Cabrera, J. M. Ramirez-Arredondo, and J. Salome-Baylon, “Interleaved power converter with current ripple cancellation at a selectable duty cycle,” in IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, vol. 2011, 2011, pp. 122–126.

9. A. Gupta, and R. Ayyanar, “Coupled-inductor configurations for a high- gain, interleaved, hybrid boost converter,” in IEEE Applied Power Elec- tronics Conference and Exposition, vol. 2020. ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION, 2020, pp. 26–32.
10. I. Yuki, K. Shota, I. Jun, and Y. Masayoshi, “Inductor loss analysis of various materials in interleaved boost converters,” in Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2014, pp. 26–32.
11. W. Martinez, C. Cortes, M. Yamamoto, J. Imaoka, and K. Umetani, “Total volume evaluation of high-power density non-isolated dc–dc converters with integrated magnetics for electric vehicles,” in IET Power Electron., vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 2010–2020, 2017.
12. H. Kosai, S. McNeal, A. Page, B. Jordan, J. Scofield, and B. Ray, “Characterizing the effects of inductor coupling on the performance of an inter- leaved boost converter,” in Proceedings of Carts USA, Vol. 2009, 2009, pp. 237–251.
13. W. Martinez, M. Yamamoto, J. Imaoka, F. Velandia, and C. A. Cortes, “Efficiency optimization of a two-phase interleaved boost dc-dc converter for electric vehicle applications,” in 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control. Conference (IPEMC-ECCE Asia), Vol. 2016. IEEE PUBLICATIONS, 2016, pp. 2474–2480.
14. J. Imaoka, M. Yamamoto, K. Umetani, S. Arimura, and T. Hirano, “Characteristics analysis and performance evaluation for interleaved boost converter with integrated winding coupled inductor,” in IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Vol. 2013, 2013, pp. 3711–3718.
15. W. Martinez, J. Imaoka, Y. Itoh, M. Yamamoto, and K. Umetani, “Analysis of coupled-inductor configuration for an interleaved high step-up converter,” in 9th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE-ECCE Asia), Vol. 2015, 2015, pp. 2241–2248.
16. H. B. Shin, E. S. Jang, J. G. Park, H. W. Lee, and T. A. Lipo, “Small-signal analysis of multiphase interleaved boost converter with coupled inductors,” IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl., vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 1161–1170, 2005.
17. N. Selvaraju, P. Shanmugham, and S. Somkun, “Two-phase interleaved boost converter using coupled inductor for fuel cell applications,” Energy Procedia, vol. 138, pp. 199–204, 2017.
18. H. Kosai, S. McNeal, B. Jordan, J. Scofield, B. Ray, and Z. Turgut, “Coupled inductor characterization for a high performance interleaved boost converter,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 4812–4815, 2009.
19. W. G. Hurley, and W. H. Wölfle, Transformers and Inductors for Power Electronics: Theory, Design and Applications. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2013. 20.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Didar Ciftci This is me
0009-0009-6454-6946
Türkiye

Arda Akyıldız
0009-0004-0983-5490
Türkiye

Batı Eren Ergun
0009-0002-5803-8485
Türkiye

Mehmet Onur Gulbahce ^*
0000-0002-6689-8445
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 31, 2024

Submission Date

July 29, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 9, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 4 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2024.24019

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA73LY33DR

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ciftci, D., Akyıldız, A., Ergun, B. E., & Gulbahce, M. O. (2024). An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 4(3), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2024.24019

AMA

1.Ciftci D, Akyıldız A, Ergun BE, Gulbahce MO. An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations. TEPES. 2024;4(3):151-158. doi:10.5152/tepes.2024.24019

Chicago

Ciftci, Didar, Arda Akyıldız, Batı Eren Ergun, and Mehmet Onur Gulbahce. 2024. “An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters With Different Inductor Configurations”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 4 (3): 151-58. https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2024.24019.

EndNote

Ciftci D, Akyıldız A, Ergun BE, Gulbahce MO (October 1, 2024) An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 4 3 151–158.

IEEE

[1]D. Ciftci, A. Akyıldız, B. E. Ergun, and M. O. Gulbahce, “An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations”, TEPES, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 151–158, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.5152/tepes.2024.24019.

ISNAD

Ciftci, Didar - Akyıldız, Arda - Ergun, Batı Eren - Gulbahce, Mehmet Onur. “An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters With Different Inductor Configurations”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 4/3 (October 1, 2024): 151-158. https://doi.org/10.5152/tepes.2024.24019.

JAMA

1.Ciftci D, Akyıldız A, Ergun BE, Gulbahce MO. An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations. TEPES. 2024;4:151–158.

MLA

Ciftci, Didar, et al. “An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters With Different Inductor Configurations”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, Oct. 2024, pp. 151-8, doi:10.5152/tepes.2024.24019.

Vancouver

1.Didar Ciftci, Arda Akyıldız, Batı Eren Ergun, Mehmet Onur Gulbahce. An Analytical Comparison of Interleaved Boost Converters with Different Inductor Configurations. TEPES. 2024 Oct. 1;4(3):151-8. doi:10.5152/tepes.2024.24019