Development and application of a modular- based, multi- level approach for increasing energy efficiency

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 5 - Cilt: 1 Sayı: 5, 355 - 366, 01.05.2015

Stefano Coss Milan Topic Karin Tschiggerl Harald Raupenstrauch

https://doi.org/10.18186/jte.72061

Cited By: 2

Öz

This paper presents a methodology how energy consumption and energy inefficiencies can be quantified for industrial processes based on a general, branch- independent approach for the purpose of increasing energy efficiency. For many companies the information of the actual energy use of their processes is very limited. Therefore, knowledge of energy consumption is only available on an overall basis and the product- specific energy costs are often calculated with a common cost- plus system. This deficiency in information is part of the reasons, why energy efficiency potentials are often neither known nor realized. For that reason a general approach is needed, which (1) uses the actual economic data of a company and (2) combines and compares it with thermodynamic analyses in order to (3) calculate the actual energy consumption of processes and products to (4) identify and quantify the energy efficiency potentials. The suggested general approach is branch- independent and analyses energy efficiency potentials. Firstly this is conducted through a modular- based, three- level industrial model mapping process. Each module contains production units (industrial plant assets), where main industrial processes are integrated into one module. The different modules are then connected on different levels in order to find product- specific production pathways. Secondly, both a top- down and a bottom- up approach are implemented. The top- down approach uses economic and overall energy consumption data and transfers it to

Anahtar Kelimeler

energy efficiency, industrial analysis, modelling

Development and application of a modular- based, multi- level approach for increasing energy efficiency

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Canadian Foundry Association (Ed.), 2003. Guide to Energy Efficiency http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/oee/files/pdf/cipec/ Foundry_eng.pdf (10/2014).
• Davies, J. T., 2012. Practical Application of improving Energy
• Efficiency in Foundries. Brics Foundry Forum 2012, Presentation. http://de.slideshare.net/NFTN/practical-applications-of-improving- energy-efficiency-in-foundries-13321931 (10/2014).
• European Commission (2009). Reference document on best available techniques http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference (08/2014).
• European Commission (EC), 2012. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing
• Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC.
• Eurostat, 2011. In: European Commission (Ed.). Europe in Figures.
• Eurostat Yearbook 2011. Publications Office oft he European Union, Luxembourg.
• European Environment Agency (2013). Trends and projections in
• Europe 2013. Tracking progress towards Europe’s climate and energy targets until 2020. ISBN 978-92-9213-410-5.
• Fachberband der Giessereiindustrie (editor), 2012. Jahresbericht 2012.
• Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfeld, A. H., Tanishima, S., Unander, F., 2006. Policies for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experiency in OECD countries. Energy Policy 34, 556-573.
• Giacone, E., Manco, S., 2012. Energy efficiency measurement in industrial processes. Energy, Vol: 38, No.5 Elsevier, 331-345.
• Gupta, J., Ivanova, A., 2009. Global energy efficiency governance in the context of climate politics. Energy Efficiency 2, 339-352.
• Kanellakis, M., Martinopolous, G., Zachariadis, T., 2013. European energy policy – A review. Energy Policy 62, 1030-1030.
• Ke, J., Prices, L., McNeil, M., Khanna, N.Z., Zhou, N., 2013. Analysis and practices of energy benchmarking for industry from the perspective of systems engineering. Energy, Vol: 54, No.5 Elsevier, 32
• Krause, M., Thiede, S., Hermann, C., Butz, F. F., 2012. A Material and Energy Flow Oriented Method for Enhancing Energy and Resource
• Industriebetriebe. Gabler 2011, Wiesbaden. ISBN 978-3-8349-2585-5
• Rodin, P., Thollander, P., Solding, P., 2007. Barriers to and drivers for energy efficiency in the Swedish foundry industry. Energy Policy 35, 672-6
• Sorell, S., Mallett, A., Nye, S., 2010. Barriers to Industrial Energy
• Efficiency. A Literature Review. Background Study for the UNIDO. Sorrell, S., Schleich, J., Scott, S., O’Mally, E., Trace, F., Boede, U., et al., 2000. Reducing Barriers to Energy Efficiency in Public and Private Organisations. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/reports/barriers/final. html (10/2014).
• Svensson, E., Sommarin, P., 2011. Foundrybench – Foundry Energy
• Efficiency Benchmarking. D16 Results of benchmarking study. http://swerea.se/Global/Swerea_SWECAST/Foundrybench/Foundrybe nch%20D16%20Benchmarking.pdf (10/2014).
• Thollander, P., Danestig, M., Rohdin, P., 2007. Energy policies for increased industrial energy efficiency: Evaluation of a local energy programme for manufacturing SMEs. Energy Policy 35, 5774-5783.
• Torielli, R. M., Abrahams, R. A., Smilie, R. W., Voigt, R. C., 2011:
• Using lean methodologies for economically and environmentally sustainable foundries. China Foundry 8/1, 74-88. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Thollander, P., Backlund, S., 2013. Barriers to industrial energy efficiency in foundries: a European comparison.
• Journal of Cleaner Production 40, 161-176. Umweltbundesamt österreichischen Giessereien – Gesetzliche Rahmenbedingungen, 2012: technische Möglichkeiten und Giessereibetriebe in Österreich für SPRU. Final report. (editor), Stand der Technik der