COMPARISON STUDY OF AIR AND THERMAL OIL APPLICATION IN A SOLAR CAVITY RECEIVER

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 6 - Issue Name: Special Issue 10: International Conference on Progress in Automotive Technologies 2018, Istanbul, Turkey, 221 - 229, 08.10.2019

Alibakhsh Kasaeian

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.654628

Cited By: 6

Öz

Nowadays, solar dish collector with a cavity receiver is accounted as an efficient and compact system for converting solar radiation energy into thermal energy. All of the incoming solar irradiation to the dish aperture area, is concentrated at the dish focal point where the solar receiver is located. In the current study, the thermal performance of the dish collector with a rectangular cavity receiver was evaluated. Air and thermal oil were examined as the solar working fluids. The performance of the solar dish collector was evaluated at different values of the mass flow rate ranging from 0.002 to 0.06 kg/s as well as different solar irradiation ranging from 600 to 1200 W/m2. The results revealed that the collector efficiency improved with increasing the mass flow rate and solar irradiation. The thermal performance of the solar dish collector improved with application of the thermal oil as the solar working fluid compared to the air in the investigated solar system. The results indicated the higher cavity surface temperature could be achieved by using air as the solar working fluid compared to the thermal oil.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cavity Receiver, Mass Flow, Solar Irradiation, Thermal Oil, Air

Kaynakça

• [1] Ho, C. K., Iverson, B. D. (2014). Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 835-846.
• [2] Gunther, M., & Shahbazfar, R. (2011). Solar dish technology. Advanced CSP teaching materials, 1, 1-63.
• [3] Harris, J. A., & Lenz, T. G. (1985). Thermal performance of solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems. Solar energy, 34(2), 135-142.
• [4] Taumoefolau, T., Paitoonsurikarn, S., Hughes, G., & Lovegrove, K. (2004). Experimental investigation of natural convection heat loss from a model solar concentrator cavity receiver. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 126(2), 801-807.
• [5] Steinfeld, A., Schubnell, M. (1993). Optimum aperture size and operating temperature of a solar cavity-receiver. Solar Energy, 50(1), 19-25.
• [6] Bammert, K., Hegazy, A., Lange, H. (1990). Determination of the distribution of incident solar radiation in cavity receivers with approximately real parabolic dish collectors.
• [7] Stine, W. B., Harrigan, R. W. (1985). Solar energy fundamentals and design.
• [8] Kumar, N. S., Reddy, K. S. (2008). Comparison of receivers for solar dish collector system. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(4), 812-819.
• [9] Khalsa, S. S. S., Ho, C. K. (2011). Radiation Boundary Conditions for Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of High-Temperature Cavity Receivers. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 133(3), 031020.
• [10] Reynolds, D. J., Jance, M. J., Behnia, M., Morrison, G. L. (2004). An experimental and computational study of the heat loss characteristics of a trapezoidal cavity absorber. Solar Energy, 76(1-3), 229-234.
• [11] Bertocchi, R., Karni, J., Kribus, A. (2004). Experimental evaluation of a non-isothermal high temperature solar particle receiver. Energy, 29(5-6), 687-700.
• [12] Ben-Zvi, R., Karni, J. (2007). Simulation of a volumetric solar reformer. Journal of solar energy engineering, 129(2), 197-204.
• [13] Yang, X., Yang, X., Ding, J., Shao, Y., Fan, H. (2012). Numerical simulation study on the heat transfer characteristics of the tube receiver of the solar thermal power tower. Applied Energy, 90(1), 142-147.
• [14] He, Y. L., Cheng, Z. D., Cui, F. Q., Li, Z. Y., Li, D. (2012). Numerical investigations on a pressurized volumetric receiver: Solar concentrating and collecting modelling. Renewable energy, 44, 368-379.
• [15] Harris, J. A., Lenz, T. G. (1985). Thermal performance of solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems. Solar energy, 34(2), 135-142.
• [16] Xiao, G., Yan, L., Ni, M., Wang, C., Luo, Z., Cen, K. (2014). Experimental study of an air tube-cavity solar receiver. Energy Procedia, 61, 496-499.
• [17] Loni, R., Kasaeian, A. B., Asli-Ardeh, E. A., Ghobadian, B., Le Roux, W. G. (2016). Performance study of a solar-assisted organic Rankine cycle using a dish-mounted rectangular-cavity tubular solar receiver. Applied Thermal Engineering, 108, 1298-1309.
• [18] Loni, R., Kasaeian, A. B., Asli-Ardeh, E. A., Ghobadian, B. (2016). Optimizing the efficiency of a solar receiver with tubular cylindrical cavity for a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle. Energy, 112, 1259-1272.
• [19] Loni, R., Kasaeian, A. B., Mahian, O., Sahin, A. Z. (2016). Thermodynamic analysis of an organic rankine cycle using a tubular solar cavity receiver. Energy conversion and management, 127, 494-503.
• [20] Loni, R., Kasaeian, A., Mahian, O., Sahin, A. Z., Wongwises, S. (2017). Exergy analysis of a solar organic Rankine cycle with square prismatic cavity receiver. International Journal of Exergy, 22(2), 103-124.
• [21] Pavlovic, S., Bellos, E., Loni, R. (2018). Exergetic investigation of a solar dish collector with smooth and corrugated spiral absorber operating with various nanofluids. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 1147-1160.
• [22] Pavlovic, S., Bellos, E., Le Roux, W. G., Stefanovic, V., Tzivanidis, C. (2017). Experimental investigation and parametric analysis of a solar thermal dish collector with spiral absorber. Applied Thermal Engineering, 121, 126-135.
• [23] Loni, R., Asli-Ardeh, E. A., Ghobadian, B., Kasaeian, A. B., Gorjian, S. (2017). Numerical and experimental investigation of wind effect on a hemispherical cavity receiver. Applied Thermal Engineering, 126, 179-193.
• [24] Loni, R. A., Asli-Ardeh, E. A., Ghobadian, B., Kasaeian, A. B., Gorjian, S. (2017). Thermodynamic analysis of a solar dish receiver using different nanofluids. Energy, 133, 749-760.
• [25] Loni, R., Kasaeian, A., Shahverdi, K., Asli-Ardeh, E. A., Ghobadian, B., Ahmadi, M. H. (2017). ANN model to predict the performance of parabolic dish collector with tubular cavity receiver. Mechanics & Industry, 18(4), 408.
• [26] Le Roux, W. G., Bello-Ochende, T., Meyer, J. P. (2014). The efficiency of an open-cavity tubular solar receiver for a small-scale solar thermal Brayton cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 84, 457-470.
• [27] Cengel Y. A. Heat and mass transfer. 3rd ed. Nevada: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
• [28] Kribus, A., Doron, P., Rubin, R., Karni, J., Reuven, R., Duchan, S., Taragan, E. (1999). A multistage solar receiver:: The route to high temperature. Solar Energy, 67(1-3), 3-11.
• [29] Hischier, I., Hess, D., Lipiński, W., Modest, M., Steinfeld, A. (2009). Heat transfer analysis of a novel pressurized air receiver for concentrated solar power via combined cycles. Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, 1(4), 041002.