THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SOWING TIMES ON THE PHENOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SEED YIELD OF THE PEA

Year 2023, , 301 - 312, 24.12.2023

Feride Öncan Sümer

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1391483

Abstract

The pea is a legume with a high protein content and high nutritional value. In recent times, it has come to be
consumed as a frozen and canned food as well as fresh. It has a special place among legumes because of its
suitability for crop rotation. In Turkey, it is mostly grown as a winter crop in the western regions. Sowing
takes place in the fall for the winter growing season. Determining the best sowing time is vital to avoid cold
damage. This study was conducted over two years in 2020-21 and 2021-22 growing seasons in the field crops
trial fields of Aydin Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Agriculture. During the study, the dry matter
values and GDD (growing degree days) of four pea cultivars (Giresun, Mayer, Local 1 and Local 2) were
calculated at four phenological periods (emergence, flowering, pod set and maturity) for three different sowing
times (November 1, November 20 and December 10). In addition, the yield and yield characteristics and
protein content were analyzed. Among the four varieties, Mayer (1.95t ha-1) recorded the highest yield value,
while Giresun (25.6%) achieved the highest protein content. The number of days to maturity, dry matter
content and GDD values of the varieties at the different phenological periods varied with the sowing time.
Higher GDD and dry matter content levels were measured in early sowing. The later the sowing, the shorter
the period from pod set to maturation and the lower the dry matter content.

Keywords

pea, sowing date, GDD, dry matter, seed yield

References

• Ali, M. Z., M.A. Aziz, M.A.I. Sarker, S. Mazumder, S.K. Paul, T.A. Mujahidi and M.S. Bhuiyan. 2016. Effect of sowing time based temperature variations on growth, yield and seed quality of garden pea. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal 19(1):29-36.
• Ahmed, B., A.K. Hasan, B. Karmakar, M. Hasan, F. Akter, P.S. Saha and M. Haq. 2020. Influence of date of sowing on growth and yield performance of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture 13(2): 26-34.
• Baloch, A. F., S.M. Qayyum, A.A. Kakar and M.A. Baloch. 1999. Marketable green pod yield response of two pea varieties to different sowing dates. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 15(2): 83-86. Pakistan.
• Karayel, R. and H. Bozoglu. 2015. Determination of morphological variability of local pea genotypes. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, 1(2): 56-64.
• Bueckert, R.A., S. Wagenhoffer, G. Hnatowich and T.D. Warkentin. 2015. Effect of heat and precipitation on pea yield and reproductive performance in the field. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 95(4): 629-639.
• Caliskan, S., M.E. Caliskan, M. Arslan and H. Arioglu. 2008. Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. Field Crops Research 105(1-2): 131-140.
• Canavar, O. and M. Kaynak. 2010. Growing degree day and sunshine radiation effects on peanut pod yield and growth. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(15): 2234-2241.
• Ceyhan, O. and E. Savur. 2011. Determination of some agronomic characteristics of edible pea (Pisum sativum L.) lines obtained by hybridization method. Selcuk Uni. Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences 25 (2): 17-23.
• Change, C. 2007. IPCC fourth assessment report. The physical science basis, 2: 580-595.
• Chapman, S.C., G.L. Hammer and J.A. Palta. 1993. Predicting leaf area development of sunflower. Field Crops Research 34(1): 101-112.
• Costa, G. E., K.S. Queiroz-Monici, S.M. Reis and A.C. Oliviera. 2006. Chemical composition, dietary fibre and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes. Food Chemistry 94: 327–330.
• Confalone, A.J.I. Lizaso, B. Ruiz-Nogueira, F.X. López-Cedrón and F. Sau. 2010. Growth, PAR use efficiency, and yield components of field-grown Vicia faba L. under different temperature and photoperiod regimes. Field Crops Research 115(2): 140–148.
• Demirci, G. and S. Unver. 2005. Effects of different sowing times on yield and yield components of pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Ankara conditions. Anadolu J. of AARI. 15 (1): 49-60.
• Devi, S., M. Singh and R.K. Aggarwal. 2019. Thermal requirements and heat use efficiency of pea cultivars under varying environments. Current World Environment 14(3): 376.
• Doring, T.F. and M. Reckling. 2018. Detecting global trends of cereal yield stability by adjusting the coefficient of variation. Eur. J. Agron. 99: 30–36.
• Esser-Monning, K., P. Roskothen and G. Robbelen. 1995. Two host genes in Vicia faba for nodulation deficiency with strain specifity for Rhizobium leguminosarum. Plant Bred. 114: 363–365.
• FAO, 2021. www.fao.org. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (Access date: 12.10.2023)
• Flores, F., S. Nadal, I. Solis, J. Winkler, O. Sass, F.L. Stoddard, W. Link, B. Raffiot, F. Muel and D. Rubiales. 2012. Faba bean adaptation to autumn sowing under European climates. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32: 727–734.
• Gan, Y.T., P.R. Miller, P.H. Liu, F.C. Stevenson and C.L. McDonald. 2002. Seedling emergence, pod development, and seed yields of chickpea and dry pea in a semiarid environment. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82(3): 531- 537.
• Gislum, R., E. Micklander and J.P. Nielsen. 2004. Quantification of nitrogen concentration in perennial ryegrass and red fescue using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) and chemometrics. Field Crops Research 88(2-3): 269-277.
• Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons. Guilioni, L., J. Wéry and J. Lecoeur. 2003. High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate. Funct Plant Biol. 30:1151– 1164.
• Hacisalihoglu, G., J. Freeman, P.R. Armstrong, B.W. Seabourn, L.D. Porter, A.M. Settles. 2020. Protein, weight, and oil prediction by single‐seed near‐infrared spectroscopy for selection of seed quality and yield traits in pea (Pisum sativum). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 100(8):3488-3497.
• Haq, M.T. and M.S. Ahmed. 2021. Effect of sowing date on growth and yield performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Elt and Education 4(4): 75-79.
• Hall, A.E. 2001. Crop responses to environment. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
• Jeufroy, M.H., J. Lecoeur and R. Roche. 2010. The seed number. In ‘Physiology of the pea crop’. (Eds N Munier-Jolain, V Biarnès, I Chaillet, J Lecoeur, MH Jeufroy) pp. 104–131. (CRC Press: Enfeld, NH)
• Jiang, Y., A.R. Davis, V. Vujanovic and R.A. Bueckert. 2019. Reproductive development response to high daytime temperature in feld pea. J Agron Crop Sci. 205:324–333.
• Jost, R., and A. Erban. 2017. The influence of sowing date on the yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds. Agricultural and Food Science 26(4): 220-229.
• Kakon, S.S., M.M. Sheikh, M.S.A. Khan, A.A. Begum, J.A. Chowdhury and M.A. Hossain. 2020. Sowing time and management effects on phenology, growth and yield of garden pea. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal 23(2): 13-22.
• Karayel, R. and H. Bozoglu. 2008. Some agronomic characteristics of local pea populations collected from different regions of Turkey. Anatolian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23(1): 32-38.
• Kayacık, H., A. Inal, M. Demirci and K. Gunduz. 2014. The Effect of Different Sowing Times on Some Characteristics of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Plant. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture 28(2): 39-47.
• Koca Y.O. and O. Erekul. 2016. Changes of dry matter, biomass ad relative growth rate with different phenological stages of corn. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 10. 5th International Conference Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture: 67 – 75.
• Lamichaney, A., A.K. Parihar, K.K. Hazra, G.P. Dixit, P.K. Katiyar, D. Singh, A.K. Singh, N. Kumar and N.P. Singh. 2021. Untangling the influence of heat stress on crop phenology, seed set, seed weight, and germination in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Front Pla Sci. 12:437
• Van Kessel, C. and C. Hartley. 2000. Agricultural management of grain legumes: Has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation? Field Crops Res. 65: 165–181.
• McDonald, G.K. and D. Peck. 2009. Effects of crop rotation, residue retention and sowing time on the incidence and survival of ascochyta blight and its effect on grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Res. 111:11-21.
• McKenzie, B.A. 1987. The growth development and water use of lentils (Lens culinaris Medik). Unpublished PhD thesis, Lincoln College, University of Canterbury: New Zealand. McMaster, G. S. and W.W. Wilhelm. 1997. Growing degreedays: one equation, two interpretations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 87(4): 291-300.
• Miller, P.R., C.L. McDonald, D.A. Derksen and J. Waddington. 2000. The adaptation of seven broadleaf crops to the dry semiarid prairie. Can. J. Plant Sci. 81: 29–43.
• Mohanty, S.K., B. Baisakih, U.K. Dikshit and B. Bhol. 2001. Kalamung, a promising localmungbean cultivar. Environ. Ecol. 16(1): 222-223.
• Neugschwandtner, R.W., A. Bernhuber, S. Kammlander, H. Wagentristl, A. Klimek-Kopyra and H.P. Kaul. 2020. Yield structure components of autumn- and spring-sown pea (Pisum sativum L.). Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci. 70: 109–116.
• Nicolas Tremblay, E.F. and Y. Desjardins. 2006. Relationships among growing degree-days, tenderness, other harvest attributes and market value of processing pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars grown in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86(2): 525-537.
• Nikolopoulou, D., K. Grigorakis, M. Stasini, M.N. Alexis and K. Iliadis. 2007. Differences in chemical composition of field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars: Effect of cultivation area and year. Food Chemistry 103: 847–852.
• Olle, M. 2017. The effect of sowing rate and variety on the yield, protein content and height of field pea. International Journal of Food and Biosystems Engineering 3(1): 11-18.
• Parihar, A.K., K.K. Hazra, A. Lamichaney, G.P. Dixit, D. Singh, A.K. Singh and N.P. Singh. 2022. Characterizing plant trait (s) for improved heat tolerance in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) under subtropical climate. International Journal of Biometeorology 66(6): 1267-1281.
• Petterson, D., S. Sipsas and J.B. Mackintosh. 1997. The chemical composition and nutritive value of Australian pulses. Canberra, Australia: Grains Research and Development Corporation.
• Rubiales, D., M. Fernández-Aparicio, A. Moral, E. Barilli, J.C. Sillero and S. Fondevilla. 2009. Disease resistance in pea (Pisum sativum L.) types for autumn sowings in Mediterranean environments. Czech J Genet Plant. 45:135– 142.
• Sabir, M. and M. Saeed. 2013. Effect of planting date on the growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.) under arid environment. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 29(1): 57-63.
• Schillinger, F.W. 2017. Winter Pea: Promising new crop for Washington's dryland wheat-fallow region. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 5: 43.
• Silim, S.N., P.D. Hebblethwaite and M.C. Heath. 1985. Comparison of the effects of autumn and spring sowing date on growth and yield of combining peas (Pisum sativum L.). The Journal of Agricultural Science 104(1): 35-46.
• Srivastava, B.K. 1991. Morpho-physiological response of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars to sowing dates. IV: Yield and yield components. Research and Development Reporter 8 (2): 137-143.
• Smytkiewicz, K., J. Podleśny, J. Wielbo and A. Podleśna. 2021. The effect of a preparation containing rhizobial Nod factors on pea morphological traits and physiology. Agronomy 11(8): 1457.
• Sreenivas, G., M.D. Reddy and D.R. Reddy. 2010. Agrometeorological indices in relation to phenology of aerobic rice. Journal of Agrometerology 12: 241-244.
• Tulbek, M.C. 2014. Pulse flours as functional ingredients. In: IUFOST annual conference, Montreal QC, Canada. Tulbek, M.C., R.S.H. Lam, P. Asavajaru and A. Lam. 2017. Pea: A sustainable vegetable protein crop. In Sustainable protein sources: 145-164. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00009-3
• Urbatzka, P. 2010. Anbauwurdigkeit von Wintererbsen-ein Vergleich zu Sommererbsen in Rein-und Gemengesaat unter den Bedingungen des okologischen Landbaus. PhD Thesis. Universität Kassel, Fachgebiet Okologischer Land- und Pflanzenbau. Hamburg/GERMANY.
• Vadez, V., J.D. Berger, T. Warkentin, S. Asseng, P. Ratnakumar, K.P.C. Rao, P.M. Gaur, J.N. Munier, A. Larmure, A.S. Voisin and H.C. Sharma. 2012. Adaptation of grain legumes to climate change: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:31–44.
• Wang, N., D.W. Hatcher, T.D. Warkentin and R. Toews. 2010. Effect of cultivar and environment on physicochemical and cooking characteristics of field pea (Pisum sativum). Food chemistry 118(1): 109-115.
• Yilmaz, N. and H.V. Kilinc. 2018. Determination of yield and yield components of local pea (Pisum sativum L.) populations grown in Giresun province. Academic Journal of Agriculture 7(2): 163-172.
• Zboi ´nska, M. 2018. How plants uptake and assimilate nitrogen? Eduk. Biol. I Sr. 2: 19–31
• Zhu, Y., L. Li and X. Xu. 2018. Effects of sowing time on growth and yield of spring pea (Pisum sativum L.) in central China. Acta Agronomica Sinica 44(1): 28-36
• Zinn, K.K., M. Tunc-Ozdemir and J.F. Harper. 2010. Temperature stress and plant sexual reproduction: uncovering the weakest links. Journal of Environmental and Experimental Botany 61: 1959-1968.