THE EFFECTS OF ROW SPACING AND PLANT DENSITY ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF PEANUT GROWN AS A DOUBLE CROP IN MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT IN TURKEY

Year 2017, , 71 - 80, 15.06.2017

Bihter Onat , Halil Bakal Leyla Gulluoglu Halis Arıoglu

https://doi.org/10.17557/TJFC.303885

Abstract

This study was conducted at the Cukurova University research farm as a double crop in 2013 and 2014 in
Adana, Turkey. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of row distance and plant density on
yield and yield components of peanut(Arachis hypogaea L.) grown as a double crop. The experimental design
was a split plot design with three replications. The Halisbey (Virginia type) variety was used as a plant
material in this research. The row spacing was arranged 70 and 75 cm, and intra-row spacing of 5,10,15,20
and 25 cm was arranged for different plants population. According to a two-year average, the highest pods
weight (97.57g plant-1 and 94.83 g plant-1
) and pod number (96.4 pods plant-1and 93.5 pods plant-1
) per plant
was obtained from 70 x 25 cm and 75 x 25 cm planting density, respectively. Pod number and pod weight per
plant was increased when the plant density was decreased. Pod yield per hectare was increased when the plant
density was increased. The highest pod yield (7511.9 kg ha-1
) was obtained from 75x10 cm and the lowest (5171
kg ha-1
) from 75x25 planting density according to a two-year average. As a result; optimum planting density
was found 75x10 cm for Virginia market type varieties in double crop peanut production.

Keywords

Double crop, peanut, plant density, pod yield, row spacing

References

• Ahmad, A., M. Rahim and U. Khan. 2007. Evaluation of Different Varieties, Seed Rates and Row Spacing of Groundnut, Planted Under Agro-Ecological Conditions of Malakand Division. Journal of Agronomy, 6(2):385-387
• Anonymous. 2015. Crop Production Statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome, Italy (http://www.fao.org/crop/ statistics).
• Anonymous, 2016. The Meteorological Data for Adana.The Turkish State Meteorological Service Adana Regional Directorship, 2013, 2014 and long term.
• AOCS. 1989. Official and Recommended Methods. American Oil Chemists’ Society Press. Champaing, IL, USA
• Awal, M.A, L. Aktar. 2015. Effect of Row Spacing on the Growth and Yield of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Stands. International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 7-11.
• Dapaah, H.K, I. Mohammed, and R.T. Awuah, 2014. Growth Yield Performance of Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Response to Plant Density. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 3(9):1069-1082, 2014.
• Donald, C.M. 1963. Competition Among Crops and Pasture Plants. Advences in Agronomy, 15: 17-27. Egli, D.B. 1988. Plant Density and Soybean Yield. Crop Science, 28:977-980
• Gardner, F.P. and E.Q. Auma, 1989. Canopy Structure, Light Interception and Yield and Market Quality of Peanut Genotypes as Influenced by Planting Pattern and Planting Date. Field CropRes., 20: 13-29
• Giayetto,O., G.A. Cerioni and W.E. Asnal. 1998. Effect of Sowing Spacing on Vegetative Growth, Dry Matter Production and Peanut Pod Yield. Peanut Science, 25: 86-92
• Gulluoglu, L. 2011. Effects of Regulator Applications on Pod Yield and Some Agronomic Characters of Peanut in Mediterranean Region. Turk J Field Crops. 16(2):210-214
• Gulluoglu, L., H. Bakal, B. Onat, C. Kurt, and H. Arioglu. 2016a. The Effect of Harvesting Dates on Yield and Some Agronomic and Quality Characteristics of Peanut Grown in Mediterranean Region (Turkey) Turk J Field Crops. 21(2): 224-232 (DOI:10.17557/ tifc.20186)
• Gulluoglu, L., H. Bakal, B.Onat, A. El Sabagh, and H. Arioglu. 2016b. Characterization of Peanut (Arachis hypogeal L.) Seed Oil and Fatty Acids Composition Under Different Growing Season Under Mediterraean Environment. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences.
• DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.18006/2016, 4(5S):564-571 Gulluoglu, L., H. Bakal, H. Arioglu. 2016c. The Effects of Twin-row Planting Pattern and Plant Population on Seed Yield and Yield Components of Soybean at Late Double-Crop Planting in Cukurova Region. Turk J Field Crops. 21(1):59-65
• Hosseini, N.M., R.H. Ellis and B. Yazdi-Samadi. 2001. Effects of Plant Population Density on Yield and Yield Components of Eight Isolines of cv. Clark (Glycine max L.). J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 3: 131-139.
• Jaaffar, Z. and F.P. Gardner.1988. Canopy Development, Yield and Market Quality in Peanut as Affected by Genotype and Planting Pattern. CropSci. 28:299-305
• Kadiroglu, A. 2012. Yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yetiştiriciliğinde Farklı Çeşitler ve Sıra Üzeri Mesafelere Gore Tek ve Çift Sıralı Ekim Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması. Suleyman Demirel University, Institute of Science. PhD Thesis (in Turkish).
• Kaushik, M.K. and A.K. Chaubey. 2000. Response of Rainy Season Bunch Groundnut (Arachis hypogeal L.) to Row Spacing and Seed Rate. Field Crops Research, 20: 407-410.
• Konlan, S., J. Sarkodie-addo, E. Asareand and M.J. Kombiok. 2013. Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varietal Response to Spacing in the Guinea Savanna Agro-Ecological Zone of Ghana. Growth and Yield.
• African J. of Agriculture Research, 8(22): 2769-2777. Kvien, C.S. and C.L. Bergmark. 1987. Growth and Development of the Florunner Peanut Cultivar as Influenced by Population, Planting Date and Water Availability. Peanut Science: January 1987, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 11-16.
• Lanier, J.E., D.L. Jordan, J.F. Spears, R. Wells, P.D. Johnson, J.S. Barnes, C.A. Hurt, R.L. Brandenburg and J.E. Bailey 2004. Peanut Response to Planting, Row Spacing, and Irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 96: 1066-1072.
• Madkour, M.A., S.I. El- Mohandes, A.M.El-wakil 1992. Effect of Row-Spacing, Phosphorus, Potassium and Born Application on Some Peanut Cultivars. Egypt J. Agron., 17:127-140.
• Nandanıa, V.A., M.M. Modhawadia, J.C. Patel, S.G. Sadariaand, B.S. Patel 1993. Resonse of Rainy-season Bunch Groundnut to Row Spacing and Seed Rate. Indian Journal of Agronomy 37(3): 597-599.
• Papastylianou, I., 1995. Spacing of Peanut Plants (Arachis hypogaea L.) Under Irrigation. Eur. J. Agron., 4: 101- 107.
• Patil, H.M., P.T. Kolekar and B.T. Shete. 2007. Effect of Layouts and Spacing on Yield Quality of Bold Seeded Summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int’l J. Agric. Sci., 3 (2): 210-213.
• Phillips, L.J., M.J.T. Norman. 1962. The Influence of Inter-Row Spacing and Plant Population on The Yield of Peanuts at Katherine, N.T. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 2(4): 54 – 60.
• Prasad, P.V.V., P.Q. Craufurdand, R.J. Summerfield. 2000. Effect of High Air and Soil Temperature on Dry Matter Production, Pod Yield and Yield Components of Groundnut. Plant and Soil. 222: 231- 239.
• Rasekh, H., J. Asghari, M.N. Safarzadeh Wishkai, S.L. Massoumi and R. Zakerinejad. 2010. Effect of Planting Pattern and Plant Density on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Peanut (Arachis hypogeal L.) in Iran. Research J. of Biological Sciences., 5(8):542-547.
• Schilling, R and R. Gibbons, 2002. Groundnut. The Tropical Agriculturist. Translated by Chater S and revised by Gibbons R, Nigam S, Chater S, Shambhakar DA, Dharne PK, Bahale TM, Anjali D, Surywanshi RT, Jadhav RB (2006). Assesment of Integrated Pest Management Modules in Groundnut on Farmers Fields. International Arachis Newsletter. 26:31-33.
• Shiwlong, T., C. Tehming. 1996. Effects of Plant Density on Dry Matters Production and Partitionning in Groundnut. Bulletin of National Pingtung Polytechnic Instute (1996) 5 (1), 1-8. Department of PlantIndustry, National Pingtung Polytechnic Instute, Taiwan.
• Silvertooth, J.C, K.L. Edmisten, W.H. McCarty. 1999. Production Practices. In: Cotton Origin, History, Technology and Production, eds C. W. Smith and J. T. Cothren, pp. 451–488. New York: John Wiley&Sons
• Sorensen, R.B, D. Sternitzke and M. Lamb. 2005. Row Orientation and Seeding Rate on Yield, Grade, and Disease Incidence of Peanut with Subsurface Drip Irrigation. Peanut Science, 28, 15-18.
• Sternitzke, D.A, M.C. Lamb, J.I. Davidson, Jr.R.T. Barron and C.T. Bennet, 2000. Impact of Plant Spacing and Population on Yield for Single-Row Non irrigated Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science: July 2000, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 52-56.
• Tavora, F.A.J.F., P.F. Silva, O.D.I.F. Melo, B.J. Pitombeire and C.V.F. Neto. 2002. Yield Adaptability and Stability of Peanut Genotypes Estimated Under Different Environments. Ciência Agronmica. 33: 10- 14.
• Wright, G.C. and M.J. Bell. 1992. Plant Population Studies on Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Subtropical Australia. 3. Growth and Water Use During a Termal Drought Stress. Aust J. Exp. Agriculture, 32: 197-203.