PATTERN ANALYSIS OF TURKISH BREAD WHEAT LANDRACES AND CULTIVARS FOR GRAIN AND FLOUR QUALITY

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 120 - 130, 01.06.2016

Mevlut Akcura Kagan Kokten Aysun Gocmen Akcacık Seydi Aydogan

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.72407

Cited By: 4

Öz

This research was carried out to characterize both 200 pure lines selected from Turkish bread wheat landraces
and 25 Turkish bread wheat cultivars based on 3 grain quality traits [thousand kernel weight (TKW), protein
content (PC), Zeleny sedimentation test (ZSDS)] and 5 mixograph parameters. Univariate and Multivariate
(clustering and ordination) techniques were used to investigate the diversity present among the pure lines and
cultivars. Both cluster and ordination analyses suggested that there were ten groups of studied genotypes.
Applying genotype-by-trait (GT) biplot analysis to the multiple quality trait data revealed that GT-biplot
graphically displayed the interrelationships among traits and facilitated visual comparison of pure lines and
selection. The results also showed that, based on the quality traits, the pure lines in different groups were
belonged to different provinces of Turkey. They were also proved to be highly diverse for 8 quality trait values
(both mixograph and grain quality) to breeders and end-users. Especially most of the pure lines had higher PC,
midline peak value of mixogram (MPV), midline time x = 8 min integral of mixogram (MTxI) and ZSDS values
than some of the cultivars. Also, our results were very contributive in selection of precious pure lines for further
breeding programs. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Landraces, Mixograph, Pattern Analysis, Pure Lines, Quality Traits, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Aghaee, M., R. Mohammadi and S. Nabovati. 2010. Agromorphological characterization of durum wheat accessions using pattern analysis. Aust J Crop Sci 4 505-514
• Ahmadizadeh, M., H. Shahbazi, M. Valizadeh and M. Zaefizadeh. 2011. Genetic diversity of dururm wheat landraces using multivariate analysis under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Afr J Agric Res 6(1):2294-2302
• Akcura, M. 2006. Characterization of Turkish winter bread wheat landraces genetic resource. PhD. Thesis. Selcuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, p 226. (in Turkish)
• Akcura, M. 2009. Genetic variability and interrelationship among grain yield and some quality traits in Turkish winter durum wheat landraces. Turk J Agric For 33:547–556.
• Akcura, M. and A. Topal. 2006. Phenotypic variability of Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. J of Plant Res 2:8–16 (in Turkish).
• Akcura, M. 2011. The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turk J Agric For 35(2):115- 125.
• AACC 2000. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10th ed. Methods 08-01, 44-15A, 46-11A. American Association of Cereal Chemists AACC, St Paul, MN, USA
• Bardsley, D. and I. Thomas. 2005. Valuing local wheat landraces for agrobiodiversity conservation in Northeast Turkey. Agric Ecos Environ 106:407–412.
• Belay, G., T. Tesemma, E. Bechere and D. Mitiku. 1995. Natural and human selection for purplegrain tetraploid wheats in the Ethiopian highlands. Genet Resour Crop Ev 42(4):387–391.
• Bordes, J., G. Branlard, FX. Oury, G. Charmet and F Balfourier. 2008. Agronomic characteristics, grain quality and flour rheology of 372 bread wheats in a worldwide core collection. J Cereal Sci 48: 569–579.
• Brush, S.B. and E. Meng. 1998. Farmers’ valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Ev 45:139–150.
• Chung, O.K., J.B. Ohm, M.S. Caley and B.W. Seabourn. 2001. Prediction of baking characteristics of hard winter wheat flours using computer analysed mixograph parameters. Cereal Chem 78: 493-497.
• Cicek, M.S., P.S. Chen, S.M. and G.R. Maroof Buss. 2006. Interrelationships among agronomic and seed quality traits in an interspecific soybean recombinant inbred population. Crop Sci 46:1253-1259.
• DeLacy, I.H., M. Cooper and K.E. Basford. 1996. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotype-byenvironment interactions and evaluation of their impact on response to selection. In ‘Genotype-by-environment interaction’. (Eds MS Kang, HG Gauch) pp. 51-84. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
• DeLacy, I.H., B. Skovmand and J. Huerta. 2000. Characterization of Mexican wheat landraces using agronomically useful attributes. Genet Resour Crop Ev 47: 591-602.
• Dobraszczyk, B.J. and B.P. Salmanowicz. 2008. Comparison of predictions of baking volume using large deformation rheological properties. J Cereal Sci 47(2) 292-301.
• Dobraszczyk, B.J. and J.D. Schofield. 2002. Rapid assessment and prediction of wheat and gluten baking quality with the 2- g direct drive mixograph using multivariate statistical analysis. Cereal Chem 79: 607-612.
• Flores, F., M.T. Moreno and J.I. Cubero. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction. Field Crops Res 56: 271-286.
• Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The bi-plot-graphical display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453-467.
• Gokgol, M., 1939. Turkish wheat. Istanbul (in Turkish).
• Harch, B.D., K.E. Basford, I.H. DeLacy, P.K. Lawrence and A. Cruickshank. 1995. Patterns of diversity in fatty acid composition in the Australian groundnut germplasm collection. Genet Resour Crop Ev 42: 234-256.
• Hruskova, M. and F. Oldrich. 2003. Prediction of wheat and flour Zeleny sedimentation value using NIR technique. Czech J Food Sci 21(3): 91-96.
• Ilker, E., F.A. Tonk, O. Caylak, M. Tosun, I. Ozmen. 2009. Assessment of genotype x environment interactions for grain yield in maize hybrids using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. Turk J Field Crops 14(2): 123-135.
• Ilker, E., H. Geren, R. Unsal, I. Sevim, F.A. Tonk and M. Tosun. 2011. AMMI-biplot analysis of yield performances of bread wheat cultivars grown at different locations. Turk J Field Crops 16(1): 64-68.
• IRRI, 2013. International Rice Research Institute. CROPSTAT software 7.0.2.03 for Windows. Manila, Philippine. http://bbi.irri.org/products.
• Jahufer, M.Z.Z., M. Cooper and B.D. Harch. 1997. Pattern analysis of the diversity of morphological plant attributes and herbage yield in a world collection of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) germplasm characterized in a summer moisture stress environment of Australia. Genet Resour Crop Ev 44: 289-300
• Jaradat, A.A. 2006. Phenotypic divergence in the meta-population of the Hourani wheat landrace. J Food Agric Env 4:186-191. Kara, B. and Z. Akman. 2007. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in the local wheat ecotypes. J Natur and Applied Sci 11(3):219–224 (in Turkish).
• Karagoz, A. 2013. Wheat Landraces of Turkey. Emir J Food Agric 26 (2): 93-118.
• Karcicio, M. and A. Izbirak. 2003. Isozymes variations in some Aegilops L. and Triticum L. species collected from Central Anatolia. Turk J Bot 27:433–440.
• Kempton, R.A. 1984. The use of bi-plots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. J Agric Sci 103: 123-135.
• Konopka, I., L. Fornal, D. Abramczyk, J. Rothkaehl and D. Rotkiewicz. 2004. Statistical evaluation of different technological and rheological tests of Polish wheat varieties for bread volume prediction. Int J Food Sci Tech 39(1): 11- 20.
• Lipkovich, I.A. and E.P. Smith. 2002. Biplot and Singular Value Decomposition Macros for Excel. J Stat Softw 7(5):1-15.
• Martinant, J.P., Y. Nicolas, A. Bouguennec, Y. Popineau, L. Saulnier and G. Branlard. 1998. Relationships between mixograph parameters and indices of wheat grain quality. J Cereal Sci 27: 179–189.
• Miles, C.W., A., Van Biljon, W.M., Otto and M.T. Labuschagne. 2013. Grain and milling characteristics and their relationship with selected mixogram parameters in hard red bread wheat Int J Food Sci and Tech 39:11–20.
• Morris, J.B. 2009. Characterization of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) germplasm regenerated in Georgia, USA. Genet Resour Crop Ev 56: 925-936.
• Neacsu, A., G. Stanciu, N.N. Sãulescu. 2009. Most suitable mixing parameters for use in breeding bread wheat for processing quality. Cereal Res Commun 37: 83-92. 130
• Ozbek, O. 2013. Turkish wheat landraces: Population structure and function. Emir Jour of Food and Agric 26(2): 137-148.
• Ozbek, O., B.G. Taskin, S.K. San, V. Eser and O. Arslan. 2011. Gliadin polymorphism in Turkish cultivated emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. dicoccon (Schrank) Thell.) landraces. Plant Syst Evol 296(1–2):121-135
• Ozbek, O., B.G. Taskin, S.K. San, V. Eser and O. Arslan. 2012. High-molecular-weight glutenin subunit variation in Turkish emmer wheat [Triticum turgidum L. ssp. dicoccon (Schrank) Thell.] landraces. Plant Syst Evol 298:1795–1804
• Ozkan, H., Y. Avivi and M. Feldman. 1998. Variation of high molecular weight glutenin subunits in durum landraces of Turkey. In: A. A. Jaradat (Ed.) Triticeae III. Science Pub Inc.
• Peskircioglu, M., S., Sehirali and M. Ozgen. 1998. Identification of wild diploid wheats of Turkey by gliadin electrophoresis. The Proceeding of International Symposium on in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity pp. 99–107.
• Peterson, C.J., R.A. Graybosch, P.S. Baenziger and A.W. Grombacher. 1992. Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard winter wheat. Crop Sci 32: 98- 103.
• Peterson, D.M., D.M. Wesenberg, D.E. Burrup and C.A. Erickson. 2005. Relationships among Agronomic Traits and Grain Composition in Oat Genotypes Grown in Different Environments. Crop Sci 45:1249-1255.
• Rakszegi, M., D. Boros, C. Kuti, L. Láng, Z. Bedo and P.R. Shewry. 2008. Composition and end-use quality of 150 wheat lines selected for the HEALTHGRAIN diversity screen. J Agr Food Chem 56(21):9750-9757.
• Rosso, B.S. and E.M. Pagano. 2001. Collection and characterization of naturalized populations of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in Argentina. Genet Resour Crop Ev 48: 513-517.
• Rubio, J., J.I. Cubero, L.M. Martin, M.J. Suso and F. Flores. 2004. Biplot analysis of trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica 135: 217-224.
• Sahin M., A. Gocmen Akcacik, S. Aydogan, S. Taner and R. Ayranci. 2011. Determination of relationships between bread volume and some physicochemical and rheological properties of bread wheat flour. J Field Crops Central Res Ins 20(1):6- 11(in Turkish).
• Sahin, M., A. Akcacik, S. Aydogan, Y. Kaya, B. Demir, H. Onmez and S. Taner. 2013. Determination of relationships between bread volume and some physicochemical and rheological properties of bread wheat flour. J Field Crops Central Res Ins 22 (1):13-19 (in Turkish).
• Sayaslan, A., M. Koyuncu, A. Yıldırım, T. Eserkaya Gulec, O. Ates Sonmezoglu and N. Kandemir. 2012. Some quality characteristics of selected durum wheat (Triticum durum) landraces. Turk J Agric For 36:749–756.
• Walker, C.E. and J.L. Hazelton. 1996. Dough rheological tests. Cereal Foods World 41: 23-28
• Walker, C.E., A.E. Walker and J.L. Hazelton 1997. Computerising the mixograph: Data collection and analysis. Pages 39-43 in: The mixograph handbook. 1st edition. C.E.
• Walker, J.L. Hazelton and M.D. 50 Shogren, eds. National Manufacturing Division, TMCO, Lincoln, NE 68508-2935, USA.
• Williams, W.T. 1976. Pattern analysis in agricultural science. Amsterdam. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
• Williams P.F., J. Haremein, H. Nakkoul, S. Rihawi. 1986. Crop quality evaluation methods and guidelines. ICARDA Aleppo, Syria.
• Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
• Yan, W. and J. Fregeau-Reid. 2008. Breeding line selection based on multiple traits. Crop Sci 48: 417-423.
• Yan, W. 2014. Crop variety trials: Data management and analysis. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 349.