Research Article

Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

Volume: 5 Number: 2 April 29, 2023
EN

Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract

Background Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is one of the standard treatment modalities for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) under 65 years of age. Renal failure, significant disease comorbidity, significantly affects treatment choices. There are conflicting data in the literature regarding the dose of melphalan to be used for AHSCT in patients with renal failure and comorbid conditions. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and side effect data of different melphalan doses in patients with renal failure. Material and Methods The study included 107 patients older than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of MM who underwent AHSCT in our center between January 2010 and January 2019. The data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: <60 or ≥60 mL/min) and melphalan doses (140-200). In addition to renal failure, patients with low-performance scores (ECOG 3 and above) or severe systemic comorbid disease were included in the Mel-140 group. Results Comparative analysis of MEL-140 and MEL-200 doses used for AHSCT showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding side effects, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Engraftment times were similar in both groups. When the patients were analyzed according to eGFR level, the incidence and severity of mucositis were higher in the group with low eGFR levels (p=0.016). The duration of engraftment, complication with a febrile neutropenic attack, and development of septic shock were similar in both groups. Conclusions In addition to renal failure, MEL-140 emerges as a preferable transplant preparation regimen considering its efficacy and side effect profile in patients with low-performance scores or severe systemic comorbidities.

Keywords

References

  1. Turkish Society of Hematology Multiple Myeloma Guidebook Version 1.03. İstanbul: Uniform; 2020.
  2. Pettengell R, Morgenstern GR, Woll PJ, Chang J, Rowlands M, Young R, Radford JA, Scarffe JH, Testa NG, Crowther D. Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in lymphoma and leukemia using a single apheresis. Blood. 1993 Dec 15;82(12):3770-7.
  3. Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Leung N, Merlini G, Ludwig H, Kastritis E, Goldschmidt H, Joshua D, Orlowski RZ, Powles R, Vesole DH, Garderet L, Einsele H, Palumbo A, Cavo M, Richardson PG, Moreau P, San Miguel J, Rajkumar SV, Durie BG, Terpos E. International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of myeloma-related renal impairment. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1544-57. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0044.
  4. Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, Arnulf B, Macro M, Belhadj K, Garderet L, Roussel M, Payen C, Mathiot C, Fermand JP, Meuleman N, Rollet S, Maglio ME, Zeytoonjian AA, Weller EA, Munshi N, Anderson KC, Richardson PG, Facon T, Avet-Loiseau H, Harousseau JL, Moreau P; IFM 2009 Study. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1311-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750.
  5. Badros A, Barlogie B, Siegel E, Roberts J, Langmaid C, Zangari M, Desikan R, Shaver MJ, Fassas A, McConnell S, Muwalla F, Barri Y, Anaissie E, Munshi N, Tricot G. Results of autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma patients with renal failure. Br J Haematol. 2001 Sep;114(4):822-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03033.x.
  6. St Bernard R, Chodirker L, Masih-Khan E, Jiang H, Franke N, Kukreti V, Tiedemann R, Trudel S, Reece D, Chen CI. Efficacy, toxicity and mortality of autologous SCT in multiple myeloma patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jan;50(1):95-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.226.
  7. Selby PJ, McElwain TJ, Nandi AC, Perren TJ, Powles RL, Tillyer CR, Osborne RJ, Slevin ML, Malpas JS. Multiple myeloma treated with high dose intravenous melphalan. Br J Haematol. 1987 May;66(1):55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1987.tb06890.x.
  8. Cunningham D, Paz-Ares L, Milan S, Powles R, Nicolson M, Hickish T, Selby P, Treleavan J, Viner C, Malpas J, et al. High-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation in previously untreated myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;12(4):759-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.759.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

​Internal Diseases

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 29, 2023

Submission Date

December 23, 2022

Acceptance Date

March 29, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Hunutlu, F. C., Özkalemkaş, F., Gürsoy, V., & Ozkocaman, V. (2023). Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine, 5(2), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1223288
AMA
1.Hunutlu FC, Özkalemkaş F, Gürsoy V, Ozkocaman V. Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation. Turk J Int Med. 2023;5(2):92-98. doi:10.46310/tjim.1223288
Chicago
Hunutlu, Fazıl Cagrı, Fahir Özkalemkaş, Vildan Gürsoy, and Vildan Ozkocaman. 2023. “Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation”. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine 5 (2): 92-98. https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1223288.
EndNote
Hunutlu FC, Özkalemkaş F, Gürsoy V, Ozkocaman V (April 1, 2023) Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine 5 2 92–98.
IEEE
[1]F. C. Hunutlu, F. Özkalemkaş, V. Gürsoy, and V. Ozkocaman, “Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation”, Turk J Int Med, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 92–98, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.46310/tjim.1223288.
ISNAD
Hunutlu, Fazıl Cagrı - Özkalemkaş, Fahir - Gürsoy, Vildan - Ozkocaman, Vildan. “Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation”. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine 5/2 (April 1, 2023): 92-98. https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1223288.
JAMA
1.Hunutlu FC, Özkalemkaş F, Gürsoy V, Ozkocaman V. Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation. Turk J Int Med. 2023;5:92–98.
MLA
Hunutlu, Fazıl Cagrı, et al. “Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation”. Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, Apr. 2023, pp. 92-98, doi:10.46310/tjim.1223288.
Vancouver
1.Fazıl Cagrı Hunutlu, Fahir Özkalemkaş, Vildan Gürsoy, Vildan Ozkocaman. Mel-200 Or Mel-140 , Which One İs More Advantageous? Retrospectively Analysis Of The Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Autologous Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation. Turk J Int Med. 2023 Apr. 1;5(2):92-8. doi:10.46310/tjim.1223288

30994   34277 29166

 

Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine, hosted by DERGİPARK, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

by-nc-nd.png