Do the platforms where professional health organizations inform the public answer all the needed questions?

Abstract

Background We aimed to assess the comprehensiveness of patient information websites from academic organizations regarding the most searched statements on "nocturia.” Additionally, we aimed to analyze the frequency of these statements based on their classification as definition, etiology, diagnosis, or treatment. Material and Methods The website www.answerthepublic.com was used to retrieve outputs related to nocturia. After applying exclusion criteria, the outputs were searched within the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) patient information websites, and the comprehensiveness scores were evaluated. Results The search engine retrieved 615 results, of which 67 queries were eligible for analysis. The most searched query was "nocturia definition", with 6,600 average monthly clicks. The distribution of analyzed queries was 16.4% for definition, 46.3% for etiology, 11.9% for diagnosis, and 25.4% for treatment. The AUA and EAU websites had median comprehensiveness scores of 2.0 (IQR: 3.5) and 3.0 (IQR: 4.0), respectively, with no significant relation found (p = 0.438). The selected websites did not cover a substantial proportion of searched items related to nocturia. Conclusions Although the patient information websites provided by prominent academic organizations offer valuable information, there needs to be more clarity between the information they provide and the public's concerns regarding nocturia. Tools like www.answerthepublic.com may provide valuable insights into public concerns but have limitations.

Keywords

• Nocturia
• Health Literacy
• Search Engine

References

1. van Kerrebroeck P, Abrams P, Chaikin D, Donovan J, Fonda D, Jackson S, Jennum P, Jhonson T, Lose G, Mattiasson A, Robertson G, Weiss J; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in nocturia: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):179-83. doi: 10.1002/nau.10053.
2. Asplund R. Nocturia in relation to sleep, health, and medical treatment in the elderly. BJU Int. 2005 Sep:96 Suppl 1:15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05653.x.
3. Glasser DB, Carson C, Kang J-H, Lauman EO. Prevalence of storage and voiding symptoms among men aged 40 years and older in a US population-based study: results from the Male Attitudes Regarding Sexual Health study. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;61(8):1294-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01454.x.
4. Akhavizadegan H, Locke JA, Stothers L, Kavanagh A. A comprehensive review of adult enuresis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Aug;13(8):282-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5485.
5. Reynard J, Cannon A, Abrams P. Conservative management of nocturia in adults. Cochrane Incontinence Group. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Version published: 30 Sep 2016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004669.pub2.
6. Pew research Center. Health Online 2013. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Accessed July 3, 2023.
7. Bates BR, Romina S, Ahmed R, Hopson D. The effect of source credibility on consumers’ perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet. Med Inform Internet Med. 2006 Mar;31(1):45-52. doi: 10.1080/14639230600552601.
8. Oermann MH, Nicoll LH, Chinn PL, Ashton KS, Conklin JL, Edie AH, Amarasekara S, Wiiliams BL. Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals. Nursing Outlook. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.005.

9. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002 May;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.
10. AnswerThePublic. Available at: https://answerthepublic.com. Accessed June 2, 2023.
11. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Viswanath K. Rimer BK. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Dec;165(22):2618-24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618.
12. Weiss JP, Blaivas JG, Bliwise DL, Dmochowski RR, Dubeau CE, Lowe FC, Petrou SP, Van Kerrebroeck PEV, Rosen RC, Wein AJ. The evaluation and treatment of nocturia: a consensus statement. BJU Int. 2011 Jul;108(1):6-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10175.x.
13. Wahlstedt E, Ekman B. Patient choice, Internet based information sources, and perceptions of health care: Evidence from Sweden using survey data from 2010 and 2013. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 1:16:325. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1581-5.
14. Dey M, Zhao SS. Google search data as a novel adjunct to patient and public involvement in rheumatology research. Rheumatol Int. 2021 Apr;41(4):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04723-0.
15. Merchant RM. Evaluating the potential role of social media in preventive health care. JAMA. . 2020 Feb 4;323(5):411-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21084.