VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD THEIR PROFESSION AND EDUCATION (Q-PTSAPE)
Öz
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of Turkish version of Questionnaire for Physical Therapy Students’ Attitude toward Their Profession and Education (Q-PTSAPE).
Methods: Included in this study were 488 physical therapy students. The content, construct, and known-groups validities were assessed and the cut-off value was calculated. The construct validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for the reliability of the questionnaire.
Results: The content validity index was obtained as 0.97. The construct validity was acceptable (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.061, Comparative Fit Index=0.905, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.892, Goodness of Fit Index=0.887, Normed Fit Index=0.860). Individuals with a Q-PTSAPETurkish score of ≥83.5 have a positive attitude towards their profession and education (p=0.001). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was excellent (0.90). ICC values of the questionnaire and its subdivisions were from medium to high (0.521-0.782).
Conclusion: Q-PTSAPE-Turkish was valid and reliable in determining the attitudes of physiotherapy students towards the profession and vocational education.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Attitude Physiotherapy Questionnaire Reliability and Validity Vocational Education
Destekleyen Kurum
Destekleyen Kurum bulunmamaktadır.
Proje Numarası
-
Teşekkür
-
Kaynakça
- 1. Webb G, Skinner M, Jones S, Vicenzino B, Nall C, Baxter D. Physiotherapy in the 21st century. In: Higgs J, Smith M, Webb G, Skinner M, Croker A, eds.Contexts of physiotherapy practice. Chatswood: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008.
- 2. Erel S, Taşvuran Horata E, Cavlak U, Çınar MA, Soysal Tomruk M, Katırcı Kırmacı Zİ, et al. An assessment of professional awareness of senior undergraduate students in physiotherapy and rehabilitation schools in Turkey. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2019; 30(3):199-205.
- 3. Ulusoy H, Kavak DG, Tosun N, Aydın Ş. Üniversitelerin sağlıkla ilgili lisans programlarında kalite eğitimi: Türkiye örneği. Sağ Perf Kal Derg. 2018;14(2):87-102.
- 4. Tedla JS. Construction of a new questionnaire for assessing physical therapy student attitudes towards their education and profession and testing its validity and reliability. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2017;6(1):20-5. 5. Yavuz Y. Üniversite çalışanlarının mesleki tutumları ile kamu emekçileri sendikalarına ilişkin görüşler. Eğitim Bilim Toplum. 2003;1(2-3):80-107.
- 6. Taşvuran Horata E. Türkiye’de çalışan fizyoterapistlerin ve fizyoterapist öğretim elemanlarının fizyoterapistlik mesleğine karşı tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021;12(2):219-26.
- 7. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
- 8. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194-7.
- 9. Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF. Youden Index and optimal cut‐point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J. 2008;50(3):419-30.
- 10. Stucki G, Liang M, Stucki S, Katz J, Lew R. Application of statistical graphics to facilitate selection of health status measures for clinical practice and evaluative research. Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(2):101-5.
- 11. Sharma B. A focus on reliability in developmental research through Cronbach's Alpha among medical, dental and paramedical professionals. Asian Pac J Health Sci. 2016;3(4):271-8.
- 12. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42.
- 13. Geisser ME, Haig AJ, Theisen ME. Activity Avoidance and Function in Persons with Chronic Back Pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10(3):215-27.
- 14. George D and Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple guide and reference. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
- 15. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
- 16. Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
- 17. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford publications; 2015.
- 18. Andrew DP, Pedersen PM, McEvoy CD. Research methods and design in sport management. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2019.
- 19. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97.
- 20. Çapık C. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. J Nursology. 2004;17(3).
- 21. Özdemir Z. Sağlık bilimlerinde likert tipi tutum ölçeği geliştirme. Hacet Üniv Hemşire Fak derg. 2018;5(1):60-8.
- 22. Gliem JA, Gliem RR, editors. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. 2003 Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, October 8-10, 2003, Ohio. Ohio State University; 2003:S147.
- 23. George D. SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2011.
- 24. Büyüköztürk Ş. Anket geliştirme. TEBD. 2005;3(2):133-51.
- 25. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH, Wu HD, Wang YW, Huang FC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(8):1343-8.
- 26. Aiken LR. Questionnaires and inventories: Surveying opinions and assessing personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1997.
FİZYOTERAPİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN MESLEĞİNE VE EĞİTİMİNE YÖNELİK TUTUM ANKETİ (FÖMEYTA) TÜRKÇE FORMUNUN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİĞİ
Öz
Amaç: Bu çalışmada Fizyoterapi Öğrencilerinin Mesleğine ve Eğitimine Yönelik Tutum Anketi'nin (FÖMEYTA) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya 488 fizyoterapi öğrencisi dahil edildi. İçerik, yapı ve bilinen grupların geçerliği değerlendirildi ve kesme değeri hesaplandı. Anketin yapı geçerliği doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ile değerlendirildi. Anketin güvenirliği için Cronbach's alpha ve sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı (ICC) hesaplandı.
Sonuçlar: Kapsam geçerlik indeksi 0.97 olarak elde edildi. Yapı geçerliği kabul edilebilir düzeydeydi (tahmin hatalarının ortalamasının karekökü=0,061, karşılaştırmalı uyum indeksi=0,905, TuckerLewis indeksi=0,892, iyilik uyum indeksi=0,887, normlanmış uyum indeksi=0,860). FÖMEYTATürkçe puanı ≥83,5 olan bireylerin mesleğe ve eğitime karşı olumlu bir tutumu vardı (p=0,001). Cronbach's alpha güvenirlik katsayısı mükemmeldi (0,90). Anketin ve alt bölümlerinin ICC değerleri orta ila yüksek arasındaydı (0,521-0,782).
Tartışma: FÖMEYTA-Türkçe fizyoterapi öğrencilerinin mesleğe ve mesleki eğitime yönelik tutumlarını belirlemede geçerli ve güvenilirdi.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tutum Fizyoterapi Anket Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Mesleki Eğitim
Proje Numarası
-
Kaynakça
- 1. Webb G, Skinner M, Jones S, Vicenzino B, Nall C, Baxter D. Physiotherapy in the 21st century. In: Higgs J, Smith M, Webb G, Skinner M, Croker A, eds.Contexts of physiotherapy practice. Chatswood: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008.
- 2. Erel S, Taşvuran Horata E, Cavlak U, Çınar MA, Soysal Tomruk M, Katırcı Kırmacı Zİ, et al. An assessment of professional awareness of senior undergraduate students in physiotherapy and rehabilitation schools in Turkey. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2019; 30(3):199-205.
- 3. Ulusoy H, Kavak DG, Tosun N, Aydın Ş. Üniversitelerin sağlıkla ilgili lisans programlarında kalite eğitimi: Türkiye örneği. Sağ Perf Kal Derg. 2018;14(2):87-102.
- 4. Tedla JS. Construction of a new questionnaire for assessing physical therapy student attitudes towards their education and profession and testing its validity and reliability. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2017;6(1):20-5. 5. Yavuz Y. Üniversite çalışanlarının mesleki tutumları ile kamu emekçileri sendikalarına ilişkin görüşler. Eğitim Bilim Toplum. 2003;1(2-3):80-107.
- 6. Taşvuran Horata E. Türkiye’de çalışan fizyoterapistlerin ve fizyoterapist öğretim elemanlarının fizyoterapistlik mesleğine karşı tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021;12(2):219-26.
- 7. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
- 8. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194-7.
- 9. Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF. Youden Index and optimal cut‐point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J. 2008;50(3):419-30.
- 10. Stucki G, Liang M, Stucki S, Katz J, Lew R. Application of statistical graphics to facilitate selection of health status measures for clinical practice and evaluative research. Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(2):101-5.
- 11. Sharma B. A focus on reliability in developmental research through Cronbach's Alpha among medical, dental and paramedical professionals. Asian Pac J Health Sci. 2016;3(4):271-8.
- 12. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42.
- 13. Geisser ME, Haig AJ, Theisen ME. Activity Avoidance and Function in Persons with Chronic Back Pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10(3):215-27.
- 14. George D and Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple guide and reference. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
- 15. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
- 16. Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
- 17. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford publications; 2015.
- 18. Andrew DP, Pedersen PM, McEvoy CD. Research methods and design in sport management. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2019.
- 19. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97.
- 20. Çapık C. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. J Nursology. 2004;17(3).
- 21. Özdemir Z. Sağlık bilimlerinde likert tipi tutum ölçeği geliştirme. Hacet Üniv Hemşire Fak derg. 2018;5(1):60-8.
- 22. Gliem JA, Gliem RR, editors. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. 2003 Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, October 8-10, 2003, Ohio. Ohio State University; 2003:S147.
- 23. George D. SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2011.
- 24. Büyüköztürk Ş. Anket geliştirme. TEBD. 2005;3(2):133-51.
- 25. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH, Wu HD, Wang YW, Huang FC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(8):1343-8.
- 26. Aiken LR. Questionnaires and inventories: Surveying opinions and assessing personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1997.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Rehabilitasyon |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Proje Numarası | - |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 20 Aralık 2022 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2022 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3 |
