Simulation and Optimization of A Crude Oil Distillation Unit

Abstract

In the present study simulation and optimization of a crude oil distillation unit of a refinery by Aspen HYSYS simulation program has been carried out with the aim of increasing the efficiency of the unit. The effects of the temperature of the kerosene removal plate, the cap temperature of the distilling tower, the stripping steam flow and the top pressure of the tower on the distillation products were determined for the aim of increasing yields of some valuable products. The yield of kerosene increased to be 5.98 % by varying the temperature of the kerosene removal plate from 202 ˚C to 206 ˚C. It was observed that the decrease in the cap temperature and the increase in both the stripping steam flow and the tower feeding temperature increase flow rates of both the kerosene and the naphtha cuts. It was noted that the adjustment such as the reduction of the tower pressure from 1.7 kg/cm2 to 1.5 kg/cm2 generates the greatest impact on the yields of the products with the highest commercial value without generating additional costs. The optimum operation conditions determined by the simulation increased the efficiency of the plant in terms of higher yields of both kerosene and naphtha.

Keywords

• HYSYS,Simulation,Optimization

References

1. Robertson G, Palazoglu A. A multi-level simulation approach for the crude oil loading/unloading scheduling problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2011; 35: 817-827.
2. Rosales M. Research Methodology. México, Editorial Mc. Graw-Hill. Inter, 2012.
3. Zhang N, Zhu XX. A novel modelling and decomposition strategy for overall refinery optimization, Computers and Chemical Engineering 2000; 24: 1543- 1548.
4. Wauquier J.P. Petroleum refining, Vol.2. Separation Processes. Paris, Editions Technip, 2000.
5. Gomez H. Properties of Hydrocarbons. Barranquilla /Colombia, Editions Paraninfo, 2012.
6. Nuhu M, Ali NA, Achinanya UD. Frequent failures of equipment in power system network-the Nigeria experience Manuals. Nigeria, 2004.
7. Rahmana A, Kirtaniaa K. Simulation study of a fractionation column with varying parameters, Eng. e-Trans 2011; 6(1): p.43A9.
8. Gadalla M, Kamel D, Ashour F. A new optimization based retrofit approach for revamping an Egyptian crude oil distillation unit, Chemical Engineering Transactions 2013; 35: 1363-1368.

9. Okeke EO, Osakwe-Akofe AA. Optimization of a refinery crude distillation unit in the context of total energy requirement, NNPC R&D Division, Port Harcourt refinery, Port Har-Court, 2003.
10. Yela S. Framework for operability assessment of production facilities: an application to a primary unit of a crude oil refinery, LSU Master's Theses. 4115, 2009.
11. Matar S, Hatch L F. Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes, Gulf Publishing Company, 2nd edition USA, 2000. MathPro. An Introduction to Petroleum Refining and the Production of Ultra Low Sulfur Gasoline and Diesel Fuel. www.mathproinc.com, 2011.
12. Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO. Perry's chemical engineers' handbook, 7th edition, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
13. Agrawal AK. Effect on naphtha yield, overall conversion and coke yield through different operating variables in fcc unit using Aspen-HYSYS simulator. Department of chemical engineering rourkela, National institute of technology. Bachelor of Technology: 56. Rourkela, Odisha, India, 2012.
14. Denn M. Processing, Modeling. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 11, 263-287, 2004.
15. Casavant TE, Cote RP. Using chemical process simulation to design industrial ecosystems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2004; 12: 901-908.
16. Rodríguez A, Carmona JA. Treatment of Oil and Gas, LUMER / Humanists. Ace, 2010.
17. Estrada O. Petroleum and Petrochemical Products, Episteme, Venezuela, 2013.
18. Walters CJ. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Development of Watershed Simulation Models. In Proceedings of IIASA Planning Conference on Ecological Systems, Vol. 2, Luxemburg, Austria, 1973.
19. Quimitec CA. Manual Well Stimulation, Maracaibo /Venezuela, 2010.
20. Michel J. Oil Production Strategies, Lumax Ed. Ontario, Canada, 2012.
21. Aspen Tech. Aspen HYSYS Simulation Basis, 2017.
22. Hernandez R, Fernandez C., Baptista, P. Research Methodology, Mc. Graw-Hill, USA, 2008.
23. Tamayo T. The Process of Scientific Research, Editorial Limusa. México, 2007.
24. Segovia, F. Methodological Research Process, 4th edition. Editorial Ediluz. Maracaibo Venezuela, 2010.