Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 69 - 75, 01.03.2018

Öz

This paper aims to present adopted material properties of masonry
elements to historical mosque and bridge structures. The importance of this
study is to adopt correct material properties with reliable reference according
to material types and structure types.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Dogangun, A., Sezen, H. (2012) “Seismic vulnerability and preservation of historical masonry monumental structures”. Earthquake and Structures, 3(1), 83-95. 2. Ural A, Dogangun A, (2007) “Arch bridges in East Blacksea Region of Turkey and effects of infill materials on a sample bridge”. In: Lourenco PB, Oliveira DV, Portela A (eds) ARCH’07–5th international conference on arch bridges, proceedings of the 5th international conference on arch bridges, 12–14 September, Madeira, pp 543–550. 3. Wenzel, F., Kahle, M., (1993) Indirect methods of investigation for evaluating historic masonry. IABSE reports, Zurich 4. Binda, L., Tiraboschi, C. (1999) Flat-Jack Test: A slightly destructive technique for the diagnosis of brick and stone masonry structures. International Journal for Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, 5(5), 449-472. 5. Atamturktur, S., Laman, J. A. (2012) “Finite element model correlation and calibration of historic masonry monuments: review.” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 21(2), 96-113. 6. Atamturktur, S., Bornn, L., Hemez, F. (2011) “Vibration characteristics of vaulted masonry monuments undergoing differential support settlement”. Engineering Structures, 33(9), 2472-2484. 7. Koçak, A., Köksal, T. (2010) “An example for determining the cause of damage in historical buildings: Little hagia sophia (Church of St. Sergius and Bacchus)–Istanbul, Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis, 17(4), 926-937. 8. Akoz, F., Yüzer, N. (1995) “Investigation of Material Properties of Kucuk Ayasofya Mosque-Sts Sergius and Bacchus of Istanbul”. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 16. 9. Teomete, E., Aktaş, E. (2010) “Structural analyses and assessment of historical Kamanlı Mosque in Izmir”, Turkey. Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 24(4), 353-364. 10. Demir, C., Ilki, A. (2014) “Characterization of the materials used in the multi-leaf masonry walls of monumental structures in Istanbul, Turkey.” Construction and Building Materials, 64, 398-413. 11. Altunisik, A. C., Kanbur, B., Genc, A. F. (2015) “The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges”. Smart Structures and Systems, 16(6), 1069-1089. 12. Can, H., Kubin, J., Unay, A. I. (2012) “Seismic behavior of historical masonry buildings with irregular geometry”. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 27(3), 679-686. 13. Dal Cin, A., Russo, S. (2014) “Influence of the annex on seismic behavior of historic churches”. Engineering Failure Analysis, 45, 300-313. 14.Saloustros, S., Pelà, L., Roca, P., and Portal, J. (2015) “Numerical analysis of structural damage in the church of the Poblet Monastery”. Engineering Failure Analysis, 48, 41-61. 15.Cakir, F., Seker, B. S., Durmus, A., Dogangun, A., Uysal, H. (2015) “Seismic assessment of a historical masonry mosque by experimental tests and finite element analyses”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(1), 158-164. 16.Nohutcu, H., Demir, A., Ercan, E., Hokelekli, E., Altintas, G. (2015) “Investigation of a historic masonry structure by numerical and operational modal analyses”. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(13), 821-834. 17.Güllü, H., Jaf, H. S. (2016) “Full 3D nonlinear time history analysis of dynamic soil–structure interaction for a historical masonry arch bridge”. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(21), 1421. 18.Baykasoğlu, A., Güllü, H., Çanakçı, H., & Özbakır, L. (2008) “Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of limestone via genetic programming”. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1), 111-123. 19. İlerisoy, Z. Y., Soyluk, A. (2012) “Impact of shallow earthquakes on the Sehzade Mehmet Mosque”. Gradevinar, 64(9), 735-740. 20. Kaya, S. M., Aydinoglu, M. N., Erdik, M., Yuzugullu, O. (1998) “Determination of Dynamic Characteristics of Suleymaniye Mosque by Analytical and Experimental Methods”. Compatible Materials for the Protection of European Cultural Heritage. Istanbul, 56-68. 21. Altunisik, A. C., Bayraktar, A., Genc, A. F. (2016) “A study on seismic behaviour of masonry mosques after restoration”. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(6), 1331-1346. 22. Mangia, L., Ghisassi, B., Sayın, E., Onat, O., Lourenço, P. B., (2016) “Pushover Analysis of Historical Elti Hatun Mosque”, 12th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul 23. Hacıefendioğlu, K., Banerjee, S., Soyluk, K., Alpaslan, E. (2015) “Stochastic dynamic analysis of a historical masonry bridge under surface blast-induced multi-point ground motion”. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29(5), 1275-1286. 24. Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A., Altunişik, A. C., Atamtürktür, S., Birinci, F. (2011) “Finite element model calibration effects on the earthquake response of masonry arch bridges”. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 47(7), 621-634. 25. Güllü, H., Jaf, H. S. (2016) “Full 3D nonlinear time history analysis of dynamic soil–structure interaction for a historical masonry arch bridge”. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(21), 1421. 26. Altunisik, A. C., Kanbur, B., Genc, A. F. (2015) “The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges”. Smart Structures and Systems, 16(6), 1069-1089. 27. Sayin, E. (2016) “Nonlinear seismic response of a masonry arch bridge”. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(2), 483-494. 28. Frunzio, G., Monaco, M., Gesualdo, A. (2001) “3D FEM analysis of a roman arch bridge”. Historical constructions, 591-598. 29. Toker, S., Ünay, A. I. (2004) “Mathematical modeling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges”. Gazi University Journal of Science, 17(2), 129-139. 30. Brencich, A., Sabia, D. (2008) “Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge”. Construction and Building Materials, 22(10), 2087-2099. 31. Ramos, L. F., Marques, L., Lourenço, P. B., De Roeck, G., Campos-Costa, A., Roque, J. (2010) “Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: two case studies”. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(5), 1291-1305.
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 69 - 75, 01.03.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Dogangun, A., Sezen, H. (2012) “Seismic vulnerability and preservation of historical masonry monumental structures”. Earthquake and Structures, 3(1), 83-95. 2. Ural A, Dogangun A, (2007) “Arch bridges in East Blacksea Region of Turkey and effects of infill materials on a sample bridge”. In: Lourenco PB, Oliveira DV, Portela A (eds) ARCH’07–5th international conference on arch bridges, proceedings of the 5th international conference on arch bridges, 12–14 September, Madeira, pp 543–550. 3. Wenzel, F., Kahle, M., (1993) Indirect methods of investigation for evaluating historic masonry. IABSE reports, Zurich 4. Binda, L., Tiraboschi, C. (1999) Flat-Jack Test: A slightly destructive technique for the diagnosis of brick and stone masonry structures. International Journal for Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, 5(5), 449-472. 5. Atamturktur, S., Laman, J. A. (2012) “Finite element model correlation and calibration of historic masonry monuments: review.” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 21(2), 96-113. 6. Atamturktur, S., Bornn, L., Hemez, F. (2011) “Vibration characteristics of vaulted masonry monuments undergoing differential support settlement”. Engineering Structures, 33(9), 2472-2484. 7. Koçak, A., Köksal, T. (2010) “An example for determining the cause of damage in historical buildings: Little hagia sophia (Church of St. Sergius and Bacchus)–Istanbul, Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis, 17(4), 926-937. 8. Akoz, F., Yüzer, N. (1995) “Investigation of Material Properties of Kucuk Ayasofya Mosque-Sts Sergius and Bacchus of Istanbul”. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 16. 9. Teomete, E., Aktaş, E. (2010) “Structural analyses and assessment of historical Kamanlı Mosque in Izmir”, Turkey. Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 24(4), 353-364. 10. Demir, C., Ilki, A. (2014) “Characterization of the materials used in the multi-leaf masonry walls of monumental structures in Istanbul, Turkey.” Construction and Building Materials, 64, 398-413. 11. Altunisik, A. C., Kanbur, B., Genc, A. F. (2015) “The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges”. Smart Structures and Systems, 16(6), 1069-1089. 12. Can, H., Kubin, J., Unay, A. I. (2012) “Seismic behavior of historical masonry buildings with irregular geometry”. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 27(3), 679-686. 13. Dal Cin, A., Russo, S. (2014) “Influence of the annex on seismic behavior of historic churches”. Engineering Failure Analysis, 45, 300-313. 14.Saloustros, S., Pelà, L., Roca, P., and Portal, J. (2015) “Numerical analysis of structural damage in the church of the Poblet Monastery”. Engineering Failure Analysis, 48, 41-61. 15.Cakir, F., Seker, B. S., Durmus, A., Dogangun, A., Uysal, H. (2015) “Seismic assessment of a historical masonry mosque by experimental tests and finite element analyses”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(1), 158-164. 16.Nohutcu, H., Demir, A., Ercan, E., Hokelekli, E., Altintas, G. (2015) “Investigation of a historic masonry structure by numerical and operational modal analyses”. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(13), 821-834. 17.Güllü, H., Jaf, H. S. (2016) “Full 3D nonlinear time history analysis of dynamic soil–structure interaction for a historical masonry arch bridge”. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(21), 1421. 18.Baykasoğlu, A., Güllü, H., Çanakçı, H., & Özbakır, L. (2008) “Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of limestone via genetic programming”. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1), 111-123. 19. İlerisoy, Z. Y., Soyluk, A. (2012) “Impact of shallow earthquakes on the Sehzade Mehmet Mosque”. Gradevinar, 64(9), 735-740. 20. Kaya, S. M., Aydinoglu, M. N., Erdik, M., Yuzugullu, O. (1998) “Determination of Dynamic Characteristics of Suleymaniye Mosque by Analytical and Experimental Methods”. Compatible Materials for the Protection of European Cultural Heritage. Istanbul, 56-68. 21. Altunisik, A. C., Bayraktar, A., Genc, A. F. (2016) “A study on seismic behaviour of masonry mosques after restoration”. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(6), 1331-1346. 22. Mangia, L., Ghisassi, B., Sayın, E., Onat, O., Lourenço, P. B., (2016) “Pushover Analysis of Historical Elti Hatun Mosque”, 12th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul 23. Hacıefendioğlu, K., Banerjee, S., Soyluk, K., Alpaslan, E. (2015) “Stochastic dynamic analysis of a historical masonry bridge under surface blast-induced multi-point ground motion”. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29(5), 1275-1286. 24. Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A., Altunişik, A. C., Atamtürktür, S., Birinci, F. (2011) “Finite element model calibration effects on the earthquake response of masonry arch bridges”. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 47(7), 621-634. 25. Güllü, H., Jaf, H. S. (2016) “Full 3D nonlinear time history analysis of dynamic soil–structure interaction for a historical masonry arch bridge”. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(21), 1421. 26. Altunisik, A. C., Kanbur, B., Genc, A. F. (2015) “The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges”. Smart Structures and Systems, 16(6), 1069-1089. 27. Sayin, E. (2016) “Nonlinear seismic response of a masonry arch bridge”. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(2), 483-494. 28. Frunzio, G., Monaco, M., Gesualdo, A. (2001) “3D FEM analysis of a roman arch bridge”. Historical constructions, 591-598. 29. Toker, S., Ünay, A. I. (2004) “Mathematical modeling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges”. Gazi University Journal of Science, 17(2), 129-139. 30. Brencich, A., Sabia, D. (2008) “Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge”. Construction and Building Materials, 22(10), 2087-2099. 31. Ramos, L. F., Marques, L., Lourenço, P. B., De Roeck, G., Campos-Costa, A., Roque, J. (2010) “Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: two case studies”. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(5), 1291-1305.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm TJST
Yazarlar

Onur Onat

Burak Yön Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Ocak 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Onat, O., & Yön, B. (2018). Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 13(1), 69-75.
AMA Onat O, Yön B. Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges. TJST. Mart 2018;13(1):69-75.
Chicago Onat, Onur, ve Burak Yön. “Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges”. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology 13, sy. 1 (Mart 2018): 69-75.
EndNote Onat O, Yön B (01 Mart 2018) Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology 13 1 69–75.
IEEE O. Onat ve B. Yön, “Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges”, TJST, c. 13, sy. 1, ss. 69–75, 2018.
ISNAD Onat, Onur - Yön, Burak. “Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges”. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology 13/1 (Mart 2018), 69-75.
JAMA Onat O, Yön B. Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges. TJST. 2018;13:69–75.
MLA Onat, Onur ve Burak Yön. “Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges”. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, c. 13, sy. 1, 2018, ss. 69-75.
Vancouver Onat O, Yön B. Adopted Material Properties of Historical Masonry Structures for Finite Element Models: Mosques and Bridges. TJST. 2018;13(1):69-75.