The Impact of Journal Self-Citation: The Case of Energy Education Science and Technology

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 699 - 714, 01.10.2012

Umut Al , İrem Soydal

Öz

The impact of scientific studies is measured and examined quantitatively and qualitatively by bibliometric methods. By means of research evaluation studies, comparisons are made in between countries, institutions or individuals indicate scientific development,and consequently all these efforts help the formation of scientificpublication policies of countries and institutions. This study analyzes thejournal self-citation concept and its impact on academic publishing. It also examinesbibliometric features of the Energy Education Science and Technology that has been indexed by the Science Citation Index Expanded since 2008. In conclusion, it is found that 94% of the Energy Education Science and Technology citations are journal self-citation. Self-citation numbers that affect the increase ofEEST’s impact factor lead to serious abnormities and cause unethical consequences

Anahtar Kelimeler

Journal self-citation, impact factor, Energy Education Science and Technology, bibliometrics

Dergi Kendine Atıfının Etkisi: Energy Education Science and Technology Örneği

Öz

Bibliyometrik araştırmalar bilimsel çalışmaların etkinliğini ölçmekte, niceliksel ve niteliksel açıdan sorgulamaktadır. Araştırma değerlendirme çalışmaları kişiler, kurumlar ya da ülkeler arasında karşılaştırmalar yapılmasına olanak sağlamakta, ortaya çıkan sonuçlar ile ülkelerin veya kurumların bilimsel gelişmişliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Aynı zamanda kurumların ve ülkelerin bilimsel yayın politikaları daşekillenmektedir. Bu çalışmada dergi kendine atıf kavramı ve dergi kendine atıfının dergi yayıncılığı üzerindeki etkileri incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda Science Citation Index Expanded tarafından 2008 yılından beri dizinlenmekte olan Energy Education Science and Technology adlı dergi bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada Energy Education Science and Technology’dekiatıfların %94’ünün dergi kendine atıfı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu durum önemli ölçüde anormallik sergilemekte ve etik olmayan sonuçlara neden olmaktadır. EEST’nin etki faktörünün yükselmesine doğrudan etki eden dergi kendine atıf sayıları derginin olduğundan farklı şekilde değerlendirilmesine yol açmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dergi kendine atıfı, etki faktörü, Energy Education Science and Technology, bibliyometri

Kaynakça

• Aksnes, D.W. (2005). Citations and their use as indicators in science policy: Studies of validity and applicability issues with a particular focus on highly cited papers. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Twente Üniversitesi, Twente.
• Al,U. ve Soydal, İ. (2011). Atıf dizinlerindeki Türkiye adresli dergiler üzerine bir değerlendirme.Bilgi Dünyası, 12(1): 13-29.
• Chubin, D.E. ve Moitra, S.D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4): 423-441.
• Davis, P. (2012). Citation cartel journals denied 2011 impact factor. 8 Ekim 2012 tarihinde http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/06/29/citation-cartel- journals-denied-2011-impact-factor/ adresinden erişildi.
• Davis, P. (2011). Gaming the impact factor puts journal in time-out. 8 Ekim 2012 tarihinde http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/17/gaming-the- impact-factor-puts-journal-in-time-out/adresinden erişildi.
• Eto, H. (2003). Interdisciplinary information input and output of a nano-technology project. Scientometrics, 58(1): 5-33.
• Falagas,M.E. veAlexiou, V.G. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56(4): 223-226.
• Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, A., Papilas, K. ve Garabinis, G. (2000). Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor.British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84(2): 266-269.
• Frandsen, T.V. (2007). Journal self-citations-Analysing the JIF mechanism. Journalof Informetrics, 1(1): 47-58.
• Garfield, E. (1965). Can citationindexing be automated? Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation, Symposium Proceedings içinde s. 189-192. Eds. Mary Elizabeth Stevens, Vincent E. Giuliano, Laurence B. Heilprin. Washington: National Bureau of Standards. 8 Ekim 2012 tarihinde http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p084y1962-73. pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Lawani, S.M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: A bibliometric study. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Florida State Üniversitesi, Florida.
• Lawani, S.M. (1982). On the heterogeneity and classification of author self­ citations.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(5):281-284.
• Lipetz, B.A. (1965). Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American Documentation, 16(2): 81-90.
• McVeigh, M.E. (2004). Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports. 8 Ekim 2012 tarihinde http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/ free/essays/journal_self_citation_jcr/ adresinden erişildi.
• Moravcsik, M.J. ve Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1): 86-92.
• Nisonger, T.E. (2000). Use of the Journal Citation Reports for serials management in research libraries: An investigation of the effect of self-citation on journal rankings in library and information science and genetics. College & Research Libraries, 61(3): 263-275.
• Öztürk, K. (2012). Şişme dergiler ve yayın etiği ihlalleri. Matematik Dünyası, 2: 69-75.
• Peritz, B.C. (1983). A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics, 5(5): 303-312.
• Scully, C. ve Lodge, H. (2005). Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused? British Dental Journal, 198(7): 391-393.
• Seglen, P.O. (1997). Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy, 52: 1050-1056.
• Semenzato, G., Rizzato, G. ve Agostini, C. (2004). Impact factor as measure of scientific quality. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,169: 1070-1071.
• Sila Science. (2011). Energy Education Science and Technology. 18 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde http://www.silascience.com/journals.aspx?id=1 adresinden erişildi.
• Thomson Reuters. (2012). Journal Citation Reports notices. 18 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/static_html/ notices/notices.htm adresinden erişildi.
• Tsay, M.Y. (2006).Journal self-citation study for semiconductor literature: Synchronous and diachronous approach. Information Processing and Management, 42(6): 1567-1577.
• Van Noorden, R. (2012). Record number of journals banned for boosting impact factor with self-citations. 8 Ekim 2012 tarihinde http://blogs.nature.com/ news/2012/06/record-number-of-journals-banned-for-boosting-impact- factor-with-self-citations.html adresinden erişildi.
• Yitzhaki,M. (1998). The ‘language preference' in sociology: Measures of ‘language self-citation', ‘relative own-language preference indicator', and ‘mutual use of languages'. Scientometrics, 41(1-2): 243-254.