CREATING ONTOLOGY BASED CONCEPT MAPS WHICH CAN BE QUERIED IN COMPUTER ENVIROMENT

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 30 - 37, 23.07.2016

Mehmet Milli Emre Ünsal Özlem Aktaş

Öz

Nowadays, Semantic web and ontology applications which came with it, are commonly used in social media, entertainment and shopping sites. But usage of semantic web in education field is limited. Semantic web applications are useful developing tools and ELearning objects can be used for creation and editing. It is important that Individuals on the internet arrange educational techniques based on their interests and needs (Stutt & Motta 2004). Thus, it is envisaged that, semantic web applications will have large contribution conception when moving to individualized education in future education. The aim of this study is to create concept maps for educators, which is one of the significant learning techniques and widely applied in the teaching process, by using ontologies. In accordance to this aim, an ontology based system made with “Protégé 4.3” developing tool based on RDF(Resource Description Framework) language and can be queried in E-Learning environment by using ontology query language SPARQL (SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language). Moreover, the developed system is able to present concepts visually to educators, which could not be done by concept maps generated with classic methods and ensured to access textual information. Therefore, students are able to perform better relations between former and recently learned concepts and achieve constructive learning easier. In future studies, ontology based concept maps which is only used as learning material in education phases, are expected to be used more effectively also in planning, learning and evaluation stages

Anahtar Kelimeler

Semantic, Ontologies, Concept Maps, Constructive Learning, SPARQL

Kaynakça

• Adodo, S. O. (2013). “Effect of mind-mapping as a self-regulated learning strategy on students’ achievement in basic science and technology,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 163–172.
• Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
• Baki, A. & Mandacı Şahin, S. (2004). Bilgisayar destekli kavram haritası yöntemiyle öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel öğrenmelerinin değerlendirilmesi. TheTurkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 3(2). 91-104.
• Berners-Lee,T. & Hendler,J. & Lassila,O., (2001). “The Semantic Web”, Scientific American, vol.284, no:5, 34-43
• Chu, K. K., Lee, C. I., & Tsai, R. S., (2011). Ontology technology to assist learners’ navigation in the concept map learning system. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 11293–11299.
• Ergin,A.(1991). Eğitim Teknolojisi Tarihçesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim BilimleriFakültesi Dergisi , 24(2), 371-385.
• Graudina, V. & Grundspenkis, J. (2008). Concept Map generation from OWL ontologies. The 3rd International Conference on Concept Mapping, September, 22-25, 2008, Tallinn, Estoniaand Helsinki, Finland, 173-180.
• Graudina, V. & Grunspenkis, J. & Milasevica, S. (2012). Ontology merging in the context of concept maps. Scientific Journal of RTU, Vol. 13, 2012, pp. 29-36.
• Grobelnik, M. & Mladenic, D. & Fortuna, B. (2009) Semantic technology for capturing communication inside anorganisation. IEEE internet computing, 13:4, 59-66
• Gruber, T. (1993). “Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing”, Technical Report KSL93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University.
• Gültepe Y. & Memiş E.K. (2014). Kavram Haritalarının Ontoloji Tabanlı Oluşturulması: Kuvvet Konusu Uygulama Örneği. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education Vol. 3, No.1,24-33.
• Hsieh, Y.C., Lee, C.I. & Chu, K.K., (2013). Effect of an ontology-based reasoning learning approach on cognitive load and learning achievement of secondary school students. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 29(5), 561-572.
• Kaptan, F. (1998). Fen Öğretiminde Kavram Haritası Yönteminin Kullanılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 95-99.
• Novak, J. D. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167-193.
• Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. & Johansen, G.T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67 (5) 625-645.
• Noy, N.F. & McGuiness, D.L., (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880.
• Silva, A. A. & Padilha, N. & Siqueira, S. & Baião & Kate Revoredo (2012). Using concept maps and ontology alignment for learning assessment. IEEE Technology and Engineering Education, Vol. 7, No. 3. 33-40.
• Stutt, A. and Motta, E. (2004) Semantic Learning Webs, Journal of Interactive Media in Education - Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web, 10.
• Tekışık, H.H. (2002). Öğrenme-Öğretme Stratejileri. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 289, 1-8.
• Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11.