Value of Blended Learning in Supporting Leadership Development Programs

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 173 - 178, 23.07.2016

Ann Toler Hilliard

Öz

The future is now Blended learning is evident in professional development training for educational leadership development programs today. With the limitation of funding and time constraints, more professional development training organizations are infusing blended learning as another educational tool to use during the leadership development training process. The leadership development process continues after face-to-face training with the support of blending learning technology. Blended learning has many definitions, but the most common meaning for blended learning is used to show a combined effort with face-to-face instruction to meet the needs of participants in the instructional environment. Leadership development programs must include three dimensions for participants such as awareness of concepts, definition and procedures/policy, understanding of measurable skills and knowledge and the application of such skills and knowledge. This study will discuss research related blended learning and its benefits, an approach to blended learning, vision and mission, professional development, collaborative leadership practices and learning communities, monitoring and evaluating program quality

Anahtar Kelimeler

blended learning, facilitators, professional development, participants, learning communities

Kaynakça

• Chrislip, D.D. and Flowers, J. (2001) The Change Project: David Chrislip. Collaboration: The New Leadership. A conversation between David Chrislip and Joe Flowers. www.well.com/user/bbear/chrislip.
• Educause (2009). EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative Discovery Tool: Blended Learning Workshop Guide. Unit 6: Quality Assurance. Retrieved 19 June 2011 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI80076.pdf e-Learning Guidelines (2006).
• Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Gillani, B.B. & Relan, A. (1997). Incorporating interactivity and multimedia into web-based instruction. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Publications: New Jersey.
• Graham, C. (2006). Blended learning systems. Definitions, current trends and future directions. In C.Bonk & C.
• Griffith University (2008). Griffith Blended Learning Strategy: 2008-2010. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/gihe/pdf/Blended-learning-strategy-FINAL.pdf Kaplan, S (2002). www.icohere.com.
• Knapp, M.S., Copeland, M.A., & Talbert, J.E. (2003). Leading for Learning: Reflective tools for School and District Leaders. Center for the Student of Teach and Policy, University of Washington.
• Krause. K. (2007). Blended Learning Strategy. Retrieved 21 July from http://www.griffith.edu.au/aboutgriffith/plans-publications/pdf/blended-learning-strategy-january-2008-april-edit.pdf.
• Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for Blended e-Learning. London: Routledge.
• Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. Retrieved 19 June 2011 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring141/shelton141.html. National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA, 2011).
• Quality Matters (2008). QM Lit Review. Retrieved 14 July 2011 from http://www.qmprogram.org/files/rubric/litReview.pdf.
• Queensland University of Technology (2011). Guidelines for the support of e-learning in new Zealand tertiary institutions, Retrieved 11 May 2011, from http://elg.massey.ac.nz/Guidelines-questions.pdf.