A qualitative study on marketing and sustainability in the meerschaum craft industry

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 243 - 256, 03.01.2026

Gökçe Yüksek , Aslı Bendenay Çapa Daşkın , Merve Kalyoncu Yolaçan

https://doi.org/10.48119/toleho.1809785

https://izlik.org/JA43EP86RH

Abstract

This study examines the marketing strategies and sustainability challenges surrounding the meerschaum (lületaşı) craft industry, an emblematic form of cultural heritage rooted in Eskişehir, Turkey. Celebrated for its distinctive whiteness, porous texture, and symbolic depth, meerschaum serves not only as a raw material but as a vessel of artistic identity and historical continuity. Using qualitative data gathered through semi-structured interviews with six master artisans, the research identifies two overarching themes: marketing and sustainability. Findings indicate that artisans predominantly depend on personal initiative for branding, product sales, and international outreach, yet face substantial barriers due to limited digital literacy and minimal institutional backing. From a sustainability perspective, challenges such as the depletion of quality raw materials, the decline of apprenticeship systems, weak intergenerational knowledge transfer, fragile organizational structures, and insufficient governmental support threaten the craft’s survival across environmental, economic, and cultural dimensions. Nevertheless, the perseverance and devotion of meerschaum artisans underscore their pivotal role in sustaining this living heritage. The study concludes by proposing strategies to foster cooperative networks and secure official policy recognition while offering an integrated analytical lens that links marketing capacity with sustainability to inform heritage craft policy and practice.

Keywords

Meerschaum , cultural heritage , handicrafts , marketing , sustainability

Supporting Institution

This study was conducted within the scope of the Scientific Research Project titled “Preservation of Cultural Memory through Oral History Research on Local Narratives about Lületaşı” with the number SBA-2025-2896.

Project Number

SBA-2025-2896

References

• Acılar, A., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2011). Exploring e-commerce use in meerschaum products marketing: a case study. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1880137
• Algan, E. (2015). Eskişehir’de meerschaum. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5(8), pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.20488/www-std-anadolu-edu-tr.220235
• Belk, R., & Groves, R. (1999). Marketing and the multiple meanings of Australian Aboriginal art. Journal of Macromarketing, 19(1), pp. 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146799191003
• Bozkurt, E. (1989). Türk el sanatları ve kültürel değerlerimiz. Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
• Credence Research. (2025). Handicrafts market to reach USD 2,317,183.92 million by 2030—Growing at an 11.00% CAGR. Available at: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/handicrafts-market-to-reach-usd-2317183-92-million-by-2030--growing-at-an-11-00-cagr--credence-research-302393405.html (accessed July 6, 2025).
• Deepak, J. S. (2008). Protection of traditional handicrafts under Indian intellectual property laws. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13(3), pp. 197–207.
• Eroğlu, E. (2013). Use of internet in the selling of handicrafts: Turkish meerschaum products. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(11), pp. 1–10.
• Eskişehir İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü. (2009). Meerschaum işlemeciliği. Available at: https://eskisehir.ktb.gov.tr/TR-149946/luletasi-islemeciligi---2009.html (accessed July 7, 2025).
• Frost, R. L., Locos, O. B., Ruan, H., & Kloprogge, J. T. (2001). Near infrared and mid infrared spectroscopic study of sepiolites and palygorskites. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 27(1), pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2031(01)00110-2
• Gümüşsoy, E. (2013). 1830-1914 arası Eskişehir meerschaum madeni ile ilgili bazı tespitler. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(3), pp. 169–193.
• Güngör, N., Demir, B. G., & Özdoğan, A. K. (2023). The role and importance of meerschaum type sepiolite in the promotion of Türkiye. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A, 24, pp. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1370092
• Hipp, C., & Grupp, H. (2005). Innovation in the service sector: the demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research Policy, 34(4), pp. 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.002
• Hu, X., Au, N., & Xia, R. (2024). The impact of mobile augmented reality on the purchase intention of intangible cultural heritage handicrafts. Journal of China Tourism Research, 21(1), pp. 156–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2024.2312974
• Katongole, C. (2025). Practices and challenges of cultural handicraft producers and sellers in the tourism industry in Africa. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584241312858
• Kaya, A. (2021). Almanca seyahatnamelerde Osmanlı şehirleri (1850-1912). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Kaya, A. (2023). The Place of Meerschaum in Travelogues as Intangible Cultural Heritage*. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 34(2), pp. 44–56. https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.1286758
• Khepar, V., Sidhu, A., & Sharma, A. B. (2022). Nanomaterized zinc sulfide‐meerschaum biomatrix efficiently suppressed Fusarium verticilloides with augmented rice seed quality benefits during storage. Pest Management Science, 79(1), pp. 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7194
• Köşker, H., & Karacaoğlu, S. (2019). Turizm bağlamında geleneksel Türk el sanatı meerschaum işlemeciliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (16), pp. 73–96. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.565813
• Kurin, R. (2004). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention. Museum International, 56(1–2), pp. 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00459.x
• Özdemir, M., & Dudaş, N. (2011). Eskişehir İli’nde meerschaum işletmeciliği ve üretilen ürünler. Art-E Sanat Dergisi, 4(7).
• Özdemir, M. (2024). Dijital çağda el sanatları: fırsatlar ve zorluklar. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 10(11), pp. 2148–2157.
• Özsöz, F. M. (2018). Şehir pazarlamasında bir marka şehir olarak Eskişehir’in incelenmesi. Uluslararası Batı Karadeniz Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), pp. 12–34.
• Salan, T., Alma, M. H., & Altuntaş, E. (2019). The fuel properties of pyrolytic oils obtained from catalytic pyrolysis of non-recyclable pulper rejects using activated natural minerals. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 41(12), pp. 1460–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1548522
• Samsudin, N., Zakaria, T., Osman, J., Ramdan, M. R., Khalid, I. K. M., Mohamad, N., Hanafi, H. F., & Sastraredja, S. (2024). The digitalization technology for sustainable rural entrepreneurship: a structured review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 42(1), pp. 14–30. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.42.1.1430
• Shen, H., & Lai, I. K. (2022). Souvenirs: a systematic literature review (1981–2020) and research agenda. SAGE Open, 12, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221106734
• Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
• T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. (2025). Geleneksel meerschaum işleme ustası Mehmet Başsav’ın vefatını derin bir üzüntüyle öğrenmiş bulunuyoruz. Available at: https://yakegm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-397857/geleneksel-luletasi-isleme-ustasi-mehmet-bassavin-vefatini-derin-bir-uzuntuyle-ogrenmis-bulunuyoruz.html (accessed July 5, 2025).
• T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. (2025). Intangible cultural heritage national inventory of Türkiye. Yaşayan İnsan Hazineleri ve Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras Dairesi Başkanlığı. Available at: https://yakegm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-344409/intangible-cultural-heritage-national-inventory-of-turkiye.html (accessed July 7, 2025).
• Throsby, D. (2008). Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590106
• Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumu. (1999). Eskişehir meerschaum [Coğrafi işaret dosyası]. Available at: https://ci.turkpatent.gov.tr/Files/GeographicalSigns/26.pdf (accessed July 7, 2025).
• UNESCO Türkiye. (2022). UNESCO somut olmayan kültürel miras listeleri. Available at: https://www.unesco.org.tr/Pages/126/123/UNESCO-Somut-Olmayan-Kültürel-Miras-Listeleri (accessed July 6, 2025).
• UNESCO. (2025). Traditional craftsmanship. Available at: https://ich.unesco.org/en/traditional-craftsmanship-00057 (accessed July 10, 2025).
• Wang, Y., Alli, H., & Ishak, S. (2023). Sustainable tourism souvenirs: fostering cultural heritage preservation through local handicraft products. Journal of Tourism Hospitality and Environment Management, 8, pp. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.35631/JTHEM.834004
• Yılmaz, A., & Yetgin, D. (2018). Seyyahların anlatımı ile Osmanlı’nın son 30 yılındaki Eskişehir (1892-1922). Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 13(2), pp. 159–182.
• Yılmaz, A., Yetgin, D., & Kozak, N. (2018). A hotel in Anatolia in the last period of the Ottoman Empire: Hotel Tadia (1892–1922). Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, pp. 118–125.