Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 59 - 67, 29.12.2019

Öz

Kaynakça

  • AEG (n.d.). Little Chronology. Available at: http://www.aegie.com/download/web_aeg_history_e.pdf (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Atkinson, P. A. and Coffey, A. (1997). Analysing documentary realities. In Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (Ed. Silverman, D.), pp. 45–62. London: Sage.
  • Bangstad, T. R. (2011). Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects. Culture Unbound, 3, pp. 279–294.
  • Barrera-Fernández, D., Hernández-Escampa, M. and Balbuena, A. (2016). Tourism Management in the Historic City: The Impact of Urban Plannıng Policies. International Journal of Scientific Management and Tourism, 2 (4), pp. 349-367.
  • Berlin Tourismus & Kongress GmbH (n.d.) Museum für Kommunikation Berlin (Museum for Communication), VisitBerlin. Available at: https://www.visitberlin.de/en/museum-fur-kommunikation-berlin-museumcommunication (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Borden, D. (2017). Save Berlin: God’s power stations, Exberliner. February 16, Available at: https://www.exberliner.com/features/zeitgeist/gods-powerstations/ (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Borden, I., Kerr, J., Rendell, J. and Pivaro, A. (2001). The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009), Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), pp. 27-40.
  • Bruner, E. M. (2005). The Role of Narrative in Tourism. Paper presented at Berkeley Conference, On Voyage: New Directions in Tourism Theory, 7-8 October, available at: http://www.nyu.edu/classes/bkg/tourist/narrative.doc (accessed 20 August 2019).
  • Bzi (2019). Bicycle Route “Bright Lights and Cold Beer”. Flyer.
  • Clandinin, D. J., and Rosiek, J. (2006). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and tensions. In Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (Ed. Clandinin, D. J.). pp. 35-80.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE., pp. 35-80.
  • Clark, K. (2005). From Valves to Values: Industrial Archaeology and Heritage Practice. in Eleanor Conlin Casella & James Symonds (Eds.), Industrial Archaelogy: Future Directions, Springer, New York, pp. 95-119.
  • CoE (1998). On the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe. CoE, Strasbourg.
  • Crouch, D. and Lübbren, N. (2003). Visual Culture and Tourism. Oxford: Berg.
  • Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. Ithaco: Cornell UP.
  • Damayanti, R. and Kossak, F. (2016). Extending Kevin Lynch’s concept of imageability in third space reading; case study of Kampungs, Surabaya–Indonesia. ITU A|Z, 13 (1), pp. 57-67.
  • Dame, T. (2011). Elektropolis Berlin. Die Energie der Großstadt. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag. Deutches Technikmuseum. (2019). Elektropolis Berlin - a Telecommunications Story. Available at: https://sdtb.de/museum-of-technology/exhibitions/1162/ (accessed 23 August, 2019).
  • Dickinson, G., Blair, C. and Ott, B. L. (2010). Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
  • E-Activity (2010). Electropolis meets Technopolis. E-Activity Records 002: Syn-Po-Tek, Netherlands.
  • Edensor, T. (2005). Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg.
  • Fabian, T. (2000). The Evolution of The Berlin Urban Railway Network. Japan Railway and Transport Review, 25, pp. 18-24.
  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.
  • Hewison, R. (1987). The Heritage Industry. London: Routledge.
  • Huyssen, A. (2003). Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ICOMOS. (2008). The ICOMOS Charter on Cultural Routes. Québec: ICOMOS.
  • Jeschke, C. (1999). Metropolis on the Move – Public Transport in Berlin. Japan Railway and Transport Review, 20, pp. 37-43.
  • Jones, C. E. K., Severo, M. and Guido, D. (2018). Socio spatial visualisations of cultural routes: Exploring collective memory on Instagram. Netcom, 32 (3/4), pp. 305-330.
  • Killen, A. (2006). Berlin Electropolis: Shock, Nerves, and German Modernity. University of California Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j. ctt1pp8gg (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Kuck, R. (2010). Mietskaserne. Explore Lab 8 Research Paper, 4, available at: http://preservedstories.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Mietskaserne-1.pdf (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Larsen, J. (2014). The Tourist Gaze 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Tourism (Eds. Lew, A., Hall, M. and Williams, A.), pp. 304-313. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Larsen, J. and Urry, J. (2011). Gazing and Performing. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29 (6), pp. 1110–1125.
  • Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
  • MacLeod, N. (2017). The role of trails in the creation of tourist space. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12 (5), pp. 423-430.
  • Marchigiani, E. and Mattogno, C. (2018). Reflecting on the Legacy of Kevin Lynch’s Cognitive Approach to City Design through Italian Didactic Experiences. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 12 (11), pp. 778-797.
  • Matzerath, H. (1985), Urbanisierung in Preußen 1815-1914. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer/ Deutscher Gemeindeverlag.
  • Mieg, H. and Oevermann, H. (Eds.). (2014). Industrial Heritage Sites in Transformation. New York: Routledge.
  • O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research Project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Presner, T. (2007). Mobile Modernity: Germans, Jews, Trains. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Rooney, C. (2018). The Berlin Underground: Cultivation and Preservation of Subculture. Glossi Mag, February 15. Available at: https://glossimag.com/berlinunderground- cultivation-preservation-subculture/ (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Roth, J. (2003). What I Saw: Reports from Berlin 1920-1933. London: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Steiner, M. (2013), Tracing the Invisible- Electropolis Berlin.
  • TICCIH Congress 2012, The International Conservation for the, Industrial Heritage Series 2, Chung Yuan Christian University. TIC (n.d.). The beer from here–brewery history. Tourist Information Centre: Kultur- & Tourismusmarketing Berlin-Pankow, Bezirksamt Pankow, available at: https://www.pankow-weissensee-prenzlauerberg.berlin/en/beer-here-brewery-history (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Turnbull, D. (2007). Maps Narratives and Trails: Performativity, Hodology and Distributed Knowledges in Complex Adaptive Systems – an Approach to Emergent Mapping. Geographical Research, 45, pp. 140-149.
  • Urry, J. (1990). The Tourist Gaze: leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  • Vattenfall AB & Centre for Business History. (2019). Berlin electrified (Bewag). In The history and heritage of Vattenfall. Available at: https://history.vattenfall.com/a-pan-european-company/berlin-electrified-bewag (accessed 23 August, 2019).
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research. London: Sage.

Tracing Industrial Heritage: The Case of Berlin Bicycle Route

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 59 - 67, 29.12.2019

Öz

This paper aims to investigate how the industrial heritage is represented on a cultural bicycle trail and used as a tool for constructing tourist gaze. A qualitative case study methodology is used, where the analysis is two-fold. A phenomenological approach is adopted at first step. The bicycle route is explored to get first-hand experience and familiarize with the data in the physical urban context. The second step is document analysis. Texts are collected and analysed for interpreting the meaning by digging deeper into socio-cultural context. The cycling route is a form of experience bridging the spatio-temporal gap between tangible heritage (monuments, landmarks) and intangible dimensions (symbols and meanings). The findings reveal shifts in meaning drawing on relations between the physical space and represented space. The cultural routes are of interest as applied tourism products. They provide opportunities for creating a strong destination image. This exploratory research is an initial examination of how cultural routes can shape tourism experience. It presents a framework to tackle with heritage and representation, while offering further avenues for investigating urban tourism where tourists can be co-creators for adding other layers of meaning. This helps increase awareness about urban heritage and offers an alternative tourist gaze and perception.

Kaynakça

  • AEG (n.d.). Little Chronology. Available at: http://www.aegie.com/download/web_aeg_history_e.pdf (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Atkinson, P. A. and Coffey, A. (1997). Analysing documentary realities. In Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (Ed. Silverman, D.), pp. 45–62. London: Sage.
  • Bangstad, T. R. (2011). Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects. Culture Unbound, 3, pp. 279–294.
  • Barrera-Fernández, D., Hernández-Escampa, M. and Balbuena, A. (2016). Tourism Management in the Historic City: The Impact of Urban Plannıng Policies. International Journal of Scientific Management and Tourism, 2 (4), pp. 349-367.
  • Berlin Tourismus & Kongress GmbH (n.d.) Museum für Kommunikation Berlin (Museum for Communication), VisitBerlin. Available at: https://www.visitberlin.de/en/museum-fur-kommunikation-berlin-museumcommunication (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Borden, D. (2017). Save Berlin: God’s power stations, Exberliner. February 16, Available at: https://www.exberliner.com/features/zeitgeist/gods-powerstations/ (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Borden, I., Kerr, J., Rendell, J. and Pivaro, A. (2001). The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009), Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), pp. 27-40.
  • Bruner, E. M. (2005). The Role of Narrative in Tourism. Paper presented at Berkeley Conference, On Voyage: New Directions in Tourism Theory, 7-8 October, available at: http://www.nyu.edu/classes/bkg/tourist/narrative.doc (accessed 20 August 2019).
  • Bzi (2019). Bicycle Route “Bright Lights and Cold Beer”. Flyer.
  • Clandinin, D. J., and Rosiek, J. (2006). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and tensions. In Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (Ed. Clandinin, D. J.). pp. 35-80.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE., pp. 35-80.
  • Clark, K. (2005). From Valves to Values: Industrial Archaeology and Heritage Practice. in Eleanor Conlin Casella & James Symonds (Eds.), Industrial Archaelogy: Future Directions, Springer, New York, pp. 95-119.
  • CoE (1998). On the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe. CoE, Strasbourg.
  • Crouch, D. and Lübbren, N. (2003). Visual Culture and Tourism. Oxford: Berg.
  • Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. Ithaco: Cornell UP.
  • Damayanti, R. and Kossak, F. (2016). Extending Kevin Lynch’s concept of imageability in third space reading; case study of Kampungs, Surabaya–Indonesia. ITU A|Z, 13 (1), pp. 57-67.
  • Dame, T. (2011). Elektropolis Berlin. Die Energie der Großstadt. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag. Deutches Technikmuseum. (2019). Elektropolis Berlin - a Telecommunications Story. Available at: https://sdtb.de/museum-of-technology/exhibitions/1162/ (accessed 23 August, 2019).
  • Dickinson, G., Blair, C. and Ott, B. L. (2010). Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
  • E-Activity (2010). Electropolis meets Technopolis. E-Activity Records 002: Syn-Po-Tek, Netherlands.
  • Edensor, T. (2005). Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg.
  • Fabian, T. (2000). The Evolution of The Berlin Urban Railway Network. Japan Railway and Transport Review, 25, pp. 18-24.
  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.
  • Hewison, R. (1987). The Heritage Industry. London: Routledge.
  • Huyssen, A. (2003). Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ICOMOS. (2008). The ICOMOS Charter on Cultural Routes. Québec: ICOMOS.
  • Jeschke, C. (1999). Metropolis on the Move – Public Transport in Berlin. Japan Railway and Transport Review, 20, pp. 37-43.
  • Jones, C. E. K., Severo, M. and Guido, D. (2018). Socio spatial visualisations of cultural routes: Exploring collective memory on Instagram. Netcom, 32 (3/4), pp. 305-330.
  • Killen, A. (2006). Berlin Electropolis: Shock, Nerves, and German Modernity. University of California Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j. ctt1pp8gg (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Kuck, R. (2010). Mietskaserne. Explore Lab 8 Research Paper, 4, available at: http://preservedstories.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Mietskaserne-1.pdf (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Larsen, J. (2014). The Tourist Gaze 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Tourism (Eds. Lew, A., Hall, M. and Williams, A.), pp. 304-313. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Larsen, J. and Urry, J. (2011). Gazing and Performing. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29 (6), pp. 1110–1125.
  • Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
  • MacLeod, N. (2017). The role of trails in the creation of tourist space. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12 (5), pp. 423-430.
  • Marchigiani, E. and Mattogno, C. (2018). Reflecting on the Legacy of Kevin Lynch’s Cognitive Approach to City Design through Italian Didactic Experiences. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 12 (11), pp. 778-797.
  • Matzerath, H. (1985), Urbanisierung in Preußen 1815-1914. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer/ Deutscher Gemeindeverlag.
  • Mieg, H. and Oevermann, H. (Eds.). (2014). Industrial Heritage Sites in Transformation. New York: Routledge.
  • O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research Project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Presner, T. (2007). Mobile Modernity: Germans, Jews, Trains. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Rooney, C. (2018). The Berlin Underground: Cultivation and Preservation of Subculture. Glossi Mag, February 15. Available at: https://glossimag.com/berlinunderground- cultivation-preservation-subculture/ (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Roth, J. (2003). What I Saw: Reports from Berlin 1920-1933. London: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Steiner, M. (2013), Tracing the Invisible- Electropolis Berlin.
  • TICCIH Congress 2012, The International Conservation for the, Industrial Heritage Series 2, Chung Yuan Christian University. TIC (n.d.). The beer from here–brewery history. Tourist Information Centre: Kultur- & Tourismusmarketing Berlin-Pankow, Bezirksamt Pankow, available at: https://www.pankow-weissensee-prenzlauerberg.berlin/en/beer-here-brewery-history (accessed 23 August 2019).
  • Turnbull, D. (2007). Maps Narratives and Trails: Performativity, Hodology and Distributed Knowledges in Complex Adaptive Systems – an Approach to Emergent Mapping. Geographical Research, 45, pp. 140-149.
  • Urry, J. (1990). The Tourist Gaze: leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  • Vattenfall AB & Centre for Business History. (2019). Berlin electrified (Bewag). In The history and heritage of Vattenfall. Available at: https://history.vattenfall.com/a-pan-european-company/berlin-electrified-bewag (accessed 23 August, 2019).
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research. London: Sage.
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Turizm (Diğer)
Bölüm Peer-reviewed Articles
Yazarlar

Evinc Dogan 0000-0003-4874-7341

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 21 Ekim 2019
Kabul Tarihi 28 Kasım 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Dogan, E. (2019). Tracing Industrial Heritage: The Case of Berlin Bicycle Route. Journal of Tourism Leisure and Hospitality, 1(2), 59-67.

Abstracting & Indexing

TR_Dizin_logo_live-e1586763957746.png       |       5e5f5ea367664.png       |  pub-doaj-1140x400.jpg      | ici2.png |   uni_global_ulrichs_header.png   |   


Making Submissions via DergiPark

The article—prepared according to author guidelines (covering text, references, tables, and figures)—should be sent to Journal of TOLEHO via DergiPark.

Please, use the links below to access the visual descriptions of the submission steps;


Full Open Access Strategy

Journal of TOLEHO is fully sponsored by Anadolu University Faculty of Tourism. Therefore there aren't any article submission, processing or publication charges

There are also no charges for rejected articles, no proofreading charges, and no surcharges based on the length of an article, figures or supplementary data etc. All items (editorials, corrections, addendums, retractions, comments, etc.) are published free of charge.

Journal of TOLEHO is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the users or institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Therefore, all articles published will be immediately and permanently free to read and download. All items has their own unique URL and PDF file.

All items published by the Journal of Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

The licence permits others to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article in any way, including for commercial purposes, so long as they credit the author for the original creation.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal exclusive right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

However, Anadolu University Press can also demand to make an additional license agreement with the corresponding author of the study after first publication, in order to publish the manuscript in full text on various other platforms (web page, databases, indexes, promotion circles and etc.).