BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Is Kugel Herniorraphy Really Minimally Invasive?: A Prospective, Randomized Study+

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4, 227 - 230, 01.08.2006

Öz

Background: Kugel herniorraphy had been advocated as a minimally invasive technique. The purpose of this study was to compare inflammatory responses and clinical outcomes after Kugel and Lichtenstein procedures. Patients and methods: Thirty patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into Kugel and Lichtenstein repair groups. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected, to measure the levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein, just prior to surgery and then 12 and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative acute and chronic pains were evaluated. Time to return normal activities and work was recorded. Results: Interleukin-6 levels significantly increased after Lichtenstein procedure. C-reactive protein levels were significantly increased in both groups. Patients had less postoperative pain and they recovered earlier after the Kugel procedure. Conclusions:In conclusion our data show that Kugel herniorraphy causes less inflammatory response, less postoperative acute pain and rapid recovery compared with Lichtenstein technique. Key words: Kugel herniorraphy, Lichtenstein procedure, Inflammatory response, Minimally invasive

Kaynakça

  • Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. A critical evaluation of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Int Surg, 1994; 79: 76-9.
  • Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open tension-free repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg, 1996; 162: 447-53.
  • Friis E, Lindahl F. The tension-free hernioplasty in a randomized trial. Am J Surg, 1996; 172: 315-9.
  • Kugel RD. Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg, 1999; 178: 298-302.
  • Baigrie RJ, Lamont PM, Kwiatkowski D, et al. Systemic cytokine response after major surgery. Br J Surg, 1992; 79: 757-60.
  • Biffl WL, Moore EE, Moore FA, Peterson VM. Interleukin-6 in the injured patient: marker of injury or mediator of inflammation. Ann Surg, 1996; 224: 647-64.
  • Gebhard F, Pfetsch H, Steinbach G, et al. Is interleukin 6 an early marker of injury severity following major trauma in humans? Arch Surg, 2000; 135: 291-5.
  • Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Tension-free inguinal herniorraphy: A preliminary report on the mesh plug technique. Surgery, 1993; 114: 3-8.
  • Gilbert AI. An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg, 1989; 157: 331-3.
  • Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg, 2001; 233: 1–7.
  • Hauser CJ, Zhou X, Joshi P, Cuchens MA, Kregor P, Devidas M, Kennedy RJ, Poole GV, Hughes JL. The immune microenvironment of human fracture/soft-tissue hematomas and its relationship to systemic immunity. J Trauma 1997;42:895-903.
  • Dziedzic T, Bartus S, Klimkowicz A, Motyl M, Slowik A, Szczudlik A. Intracerebral hemorrhage triggers Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10 release in blood. Stroke 2002;33:2334-5.
  • Stadnyk AW, Gauldie J. The acute phase protein response during parasitic infection. Immunol Today, 1991; 12: 7-12.
  • Di Vita G, Milano S, Frazetta M, et al. Tension-free hernia repair is associated with an increase in inflammatory response markers against the mesh. Am J Surg, 2000; 180:203-7.
  • Fenoglio ME, Bermas HR, Haun WE, Moore JT. Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach. Hernia, 2005; 9: 160-1.
  • Reddy KM, Humphreys W, Chew A, Toouli J. Inguinal hernia repair with the Kugel patch. ANZ J Surg, 2005; 75: 43-7.
  • Baroody M, Bansal V, Maish G. The open preperitoneal approach to recurrent inguinal hernias in high-risk patients. Hernia, 2004; 8: 373-5.
  • Schroder DM, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Wesen CA. Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surg, 2004; 70: 132–6.
  • Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, et al. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg, 2002; 89: 45-9.
  • Köninger J, Redecke J, Butters M. Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2004; 389: 361-5.
  • Crozier TA, Muller JE, Quittkat D, et al. Effect of anaesthesia on the cytokine response to abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesthes, 1994; 72: 280-5.
  • Schwab R, Eissele S, Brückner UB, Gebhard F, Becker HP. Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic (TEP) vs Shouldice groin hernia repair. Hernia 2004; 8: 226-32.

Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4, 227 - 230, 01.08.2006

Öz

Amaç: Kugel fıtık tamirinin minimal invaziv bir teknik olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Kugel ve Lichtenstein girişimlerinden sonra gelişen enflamatuvar yanıtları ve klinik sonuçları karşılaştırmaktı. Hastalar ve Metotlar: Tek taraflı kasık fıtığı olan 30 hasta Kugel ve Lichtenstein tamir gruplarına rastgele ayrıldılar. Cerrahi girişimden hemen önce ve girişimden sonraki 12. ve 48. saatlerde, interlökin-6 ve C-reaktif protein seviyelerini ölçmek için periferik venöz kan örnekleri alındı. Cerrahi sonrası akut ve kronik ağrı değerlendirildi. Normal aktivitelere ve işe dönüş süreleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Lichtenstein girişiminden sonra interlökin-6 düzeyleri belirgin olarak artarken Kugel fıtık tamiri, interlökin-6 düzeylerinde anlamlı olmayan bir artışa neden oldu. C-reaktif protein düzeyleri her iki grupta da belirgin olarak arttı. Kugel girişiminden sonra hastaların ağrısı daha azdı ve daha erken iyileştiler. Sonuç: Sonuçlarımız göstermektedir ki, Kugel fıtık tamiri Lichtenstein tekniği ile karşılaştırıldığında daha az enflamatuvar yanıta, daha az ameliyat sonrası ağrıya ve daha hızlı iyileşmeye neden olmaktadır. Anahtar kelimeler: Kugel fıtık tamiri, Lichtenstein ameliyatı, Enflamatuvar yanıt, Minimal invaziv

Kaynakça

  • Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. A critical evaluation of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Int Surg, 1994; 79: 76-9.
  • Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open tension-free repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg, 1996; 162: 447-53.
  • Friis E, Lindahl F. The tension-free hernioplasty in a randomized trial. Am J Surg, 1996; 172: 315-9.
  • Kugel RD. Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg, 1999; 178: 298-302.
  • Baigrie RJ, Lamont PM, Kwiatkowski D, et al. Systemic cytokine response after major surgery. Br J Surg, 1992; 79: 757-60.
  • Biffl WL, Moore EE, Moore FA, Peterson VM. Interleukin-6 in the injured patient: marker of injury or mediator of inflammation. Ann Surg, 1996; 224: 647-64.
  • Gebhard F, Pfetsch H, Steinbach G, et al. Is interleukin 6 an early marker of injury severity following major trauma in humans? Arch Surg, 2000; 135: 291-5.
  • Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Tension-free inguinal herniorraphy: A preliminary report on the mesh plug technique. Surgery, 1993; 114: 3-8.
  • Gilbert AI. An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg, 1989; 157: 331-3.
  • Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg, 2001; 233: 1–7.
  • Hauser CJ, Zhou X, Joshi P, Cuchens MA, Kregor P, Devidas M, Kennedy RJ, Poole GV, Hughes JL. The immune microenvironment of human fracture/soft-tissue hematomas and its relationship to systemic immunity. J Trauma 1997;42:895-903.
  • Dziedzic T, Bartus S, Klimkowicz A, Motyl M, Slowik A, Szczudlik A. Intracerebral hemorrhage triggers Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10 release in blood. Stroke 2002;33:2334-5.
  • Stadnyk AW, Gauldie J. The acute phase protein response during parasitic infection. Immunol Today, 1991; 12: 7-12.
  • Di Vita G, Milano S, Frazetta M, et al. Tension-free hernia repair is associated with an increase in inflammatory response markers against the mesh. Am J Surg, 2000; 180:203-7.
  • Fenoglio ME, Bermas HR, Haun WE, Moore JT. Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach. Hernia, 2005; 9: 160-1.
  • Reddy KM, Humphreys W, Chew A, Toouli J. Inguinal hernia repair with the Kugel patch. ANZ J Surg, 2005; 75: 43-7.
  • Baroody M, Bansal V, Maish G. The open preperitoneal approach to recurrent inguinal hernias in high-risk patients. Hernia, 2004; 8: 373-5.
  • Schroder DM, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Wesen CA. Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surg, 2004; 70: 132–6.
  • Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, et al. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg, 2002; 89: 45-9.
  • Köninger J, Redecke J, Butters M. Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2004; 389: 361-5.
  • Crozier TA, Muller JE, Quittkat D, et al. Effect of anaesthesia on the cytokine response to abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesthes, 1994; 72: 280-5.
  • Schwab R, Eissele S, Brückner UB, Gebhard F, Becker HP. Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic (TEP) vs Shouldice groin hernia repair. Hernia 2004; 8: 226-32.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Cüneyt Kırkıl Bu kişi benim

Erhan Aygen Bu kişi benim

Nurullah Bülbüller Bu kişi benim

Osman Doğru Bu kişi benim

Ahmet Ödekmerdan Bu kişi benim

Mustafa Girgin Bu kişi benim

Mehmet Saraç Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ağustos 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Kırkıl, C., Aygen, E., Bülbüller, N., Doğru, O., vd. (2006). Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma. Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center, 13(4), 227-230.
AMA Kırkıl C, Aygen E, Bülbüller N, Doğru O, Ödekmerdan A, Girgin M, Saraç M. Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma. Turgut Özal Tıp Merk Derg. Ağustos 2006;13(4):227-230.
Chicago Kırkıl, Cüneyt, Erhan Aygen, Nurullah Bülbüller, Osman Doğru, Ahmet Ödekmerdan, Mustafa Girgin, ve Mehmet Saraç. “Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma”. Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center 13, sy. 4 (Ağustos 2006): 227-30.
EndNote Kırkıl C, Aygen E, Bülbüller N, Doğru O, Ödekmerdan A, Girgin M, Saraç M (01 Ağustos 2006) Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma. Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center 13 4 227–230.
IEEE C. Kırkıl, “Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma”, Turgut Özal Tıp Merk Derg, c. 13, sy. 4, ss. 227–230, 2006.
ISNAD Kırkıl, Cüneyt vd. “Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma”. Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center 13/4 (Ağustos 2006), 227-230.
JAMA Kırkıl C, Aygen E, Bülbüller N, Doğru O, Ödekmerdan A, Girgin M, Saraç M. Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma. Turgut Özal Tıp Merk Derg. 2006;13:227–230.
MLA Kırkıl, Cüneyt vd. “Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma”. Journal of Turgut Ozal Medical Center, c. 13, sy. 4, 2006, ss. 227-30.
Vancouver Kırkıl C, Aygen E, Bülbüller N, Doğru O, Ödekmerdan A, Girgin M, Saraç M. Kugel Fıtık Tamiri Gerçekten Minimal İnvaziv midir?: Prospektif Randomize Bir Çalışma. Turgut Özal Tıp Merk Derg. 2006;13(4):227-30.