Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2015, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 44, 37 - 47, 01.09.2015

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Adler, A. (1964). Social interest: A challenge to mankind. New York: Capricorn.
  • Aslan, S. ve Güven, M. (2010). Bağlanma ve kişisel uyum arasındaki ilişkide ayrışma bireyleşmenin rolü. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35 (157), 181-191.
  • Baumeister, R.F. ve Leary, M.R. (1995). The Need of belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 17 (3), 497-529.
  • Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
  • Browne, M. W. ve Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Chen, C. P. (1999). Transition to higher education: Major aspects and counseling guidelines. Guidance and Counseling, 4 (3), 31-37.
  • Chipuer, C. H. (2001). Dyadic attachments and community connectedness: Links with youths’loneliness experiences. Journal of Community Psychology. 29 (4), 429-446. Choenarom, C., Williams, R. A. ve Hagerty, B.M.
  • (2005). The role of sense of belonging and social support on stres and depression in individuals with depression. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 19 (1), 19-29.
  • Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Ergenlerde Benlik Saygısı. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • Demir, A. (1989). UCLA yalnızlık ölçeğinin geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 7 (23), 14- 18.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71– 75.
  • Duru, E. (2007). Sosyal bağlılık ölçeği’nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi (EJER), 26, 85-94.
  • Duru, E. (2008a). Yalnızlığı yordamada sosyal destek ve sosyal bağlılığın rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24, (61), 15–24.
  • Duru, E. (2008b). Üniversiteye Uyum Sürecinde Yalnızlığı Yordamada Sosyal Destek ve Sosyal Bağlılığın Doğrudan ve Dolaylı Rolleri. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 29, 13-22.
  • Duru, E. ve Poyrazlı, S. (2011). Perceived discrimination, social connectedness, and other predictors of adjustment difficulties among Turkish international students. International Journal of Psychology. 46 (6), 446- 454.
  • Fayers, P.M. ve Machin, D. (1998). Quality of live assessment in clinical trials, methods and practice. New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve negatif duygu ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15 (46), 19-26.
  • Glasser, W. (1984). Reality Therapy. In R. Corsini (Ed.). Current psychotherapies (pp. 320- 353), Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
  • Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualist- collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28 (6), 787-794.
  • Hagerty, B., Lynch-Sauer, J., Patusky, K., Bouwsema, M. ve Collier, P. (1992). Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 6 (3), 172– 177.
  • Hagerty, B. M., Williams, R. A. ve Oe, H. (2002). Childhood antecedents of adult sense of belonging. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 58 (7), 793-801.
  • Hagerty, B. M. ve Patusky, K. (1995). Developing a measure of sense of belonging. Nursing Research, 44, 9–13.
  • Hill, L. H. (2006). Sense of belonging as connectedness, American Indian worldview, and mental health. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 20 (5), 210–216.
  • Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, L. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1-55.
  • Jones, W. H. ve Carver, M. D. (1991). Adjustment and coping implications of loneliness. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (eds .) Handbook of social and clinical psychology, 42 , 682-689.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1 (3), 180-186.
  • Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. ve İmamoğlu, O. E. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Social psychology, 142 (3), 333-351.
  • King, A. K., Vidourek, A. R., Davis, B. ve McClellan, W. ( 2002). Increasing self-esteem and School connectedness trough a multidimensional mentoring program. Journal of School Health. 72 (7), 294-299.
  • Leary, M.R., Kelly, K.M., Cottrell, C.A. ve Schreindorfer, L.S. (2006). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University.
  • Lee, R. M. ve Robbins, B. S. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42 (2), 232-241.
  • Lee, R. M. ve Robbins, S.B. (1998). The Relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, selfesteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45 (3), 338-345.
  • Levett-Jones, T., Lathlean, J., Maguire, J. ve McMillan, M. (2007). Belongingness: A critique of the concept and implications for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 27, 210–218.
  • Malone, G.P., Pillow, D. R. ve Osman, A. (2012). The General belongingness scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 311–316.
  • Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking press.
  • McMillan, D. M. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315–325.
  • McMillan, D. M. ve Chavis, D. W. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
  • McConnell, A.R., Shoda, T. M. ve Skulborstad, H. M. (2012). The Self as a collection of multiple self-aspects: structure, development, operation, and implications. Social Cognition, 30 (4) 380–395.
  • Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth , L., Hayashi, Y. ve Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 213–218.
  • Murray, A. S. (2004). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: A study of university student dating couples in 17 nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 38 (4), 407-432.
  • Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Research of Educational Research, 70 (3), 323-367.
  • Peled, E. ve Muzicant, A. (2008). The Meaning of home for runaway girls. Journal of CommunityPsychology, 36 (4), 434–451.
  • Pond, C. S. (1998). Acceptance and belonging: The promotion of acceptance and belonging within group Art Therapy. American Journal of Art Therapy. 36, 81-89.
  • Ryzin, M. J. V., Gravely, E. A. A. ve Roseth, C. R. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 38, 1–12.
  • Romano, D. M. (2004). A self-psychology approach to narcissistic personality disorder: A Nursing reflection. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 40 (1), 20-28.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent selfimage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Second Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hilsdale, New Jersey.
  • Simmons, C., Aysan, F., Thompson, D., Hamarat, E. ve Steele, D. (2002). Coping resource availability and level of perceived stress as predictors of life satisfaction in a cohort of Turkish college students. College Student Journal, 36 (1), 129-142.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A. ve Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063-1070.

Genel Aidiyet Ölçeğinin Psikometrik Özellikleri: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 44, 37 - 47, 01.09.2015

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Malone, Pillow ve Osman (2012) tarafından geliştirilen Genel Aidiyet Ölçeği’nin (GAÖ) psikometrik özelliklerini araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya Pamukkale Üniversitesi’nin farklı bölümlerinde öğrenim gören, yaşları 19 ile 29 arasında değişen, toplam 442 üniversite öğrencisi (305 kız, 137 erkek) katılmıştır. Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları ölçeğin iki faktörlü yapısını desteklemektedir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre yüksek aidiyet düzeyi; düşük yalnızlık, düşük olumsuz duygulanım, yüksek benlik saygısı, yüksek yaşam doyumu, yüksek olumlu duygulanım ve yüksek sosyal bağlılıkla ilişkilidir. Birleştirici, yordayıcı ve ayırt edicilikle ilgili analiz sonuçları, ölçeğin yüksek düzeyde ölçüt bağıntılı geçerliğe sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ek olarak ölçek yüksek iç ve test-tekrar test tutarlığına sahiptir. Bu sonuçlar Genel Aidiyet Ölçeği ve onun alt ölçeklerinin ülkemizde üniversite öğrencilerinin aidiyet düzeylerini değerlendirmede kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.


Kaynakça

  • Adler, A. (1964). Social interest: A challenge to mankind. New York: Capricorn.
  • Aslan, S. ve Güven, M. (2010). Bağlanma ve kişisel uyum arasındaki ilişkide ayrışma bireyleşmenin rolü. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35 (157), 181-191.
  • Baumeister, R.F. ve Leary, M.R. (1995). The Need of belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 17 (3), 497-529.
  • Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
  • Browne, M. W. ve Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Chen, C. P. (1999). Transition to higher education: Major aspects and counseling guidelines. Guidance and Counseling, 4 (3), 31-37.
  • Chipuer, C. H. (2001). Dyadic attachments and community connectedness: Links with youths’loneliness experiences. Journal of Community Psychology. 29 (4), 429-446. Choenarom, C., Williams, R. A. ve Hagerty, B.M.
  • (2005). The role of sense of belonging and social support on stres and depression in individuals with depression. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 19 (1), 19-29.
  • Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Ergenlerde Benlik Saygısı. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • Demir, A. (1989). UCLA yalnızlık ölçeğinin geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 7 (23), 14- 18.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71– 75.
  • Duru, E. (2007). Sosyal bağlılık ölçeği’nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi (EJER), 26, 85-94.
  • Duru, E. (2008a). Yalnızlığı yordamada sosyal destek ve sosyal bağlılığın rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24, (61), 15–24.
  • Duru, E. (2008b). Üniversiteye Uyum Sürecinde Yalnızlığı Yordamada Sosyal Destek ve Sosyal Bağlılığın Doğrudan ve Dolaylı Rolleri. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 29, 13-22.
  • Duru, E. ve Poyrazlı, S. (2011). Perceived discrimination, social connectedness, and other predictors of adjustment difficulties among Turkish international students. International Journal of Psychology. 46 (6), 446- 454.
  • Fayers, P.M. ve Machin, D. (1998). Quality of live assessment in clinical trials, methods and practice. New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve negatif duygu ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15 (46), 19-26.
  • Glasser, W. (1984). Reality Therapy. In R. Corsini (Ed.). Current psychotherapies (pp. 320- 353), Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
  • Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualist- collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28 (6), 787-794.
  • Hagerty, B., Lynch-Sauer, J., Patusky, K., Bouwsema, M. ve Collier, P. (1992). Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 6 (3), 172– 177.
  • Hagerty, B. M., Williams, R. A. ve Oe, H. (2002). Childhood antecedents of adult sense of belonging. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 58 (7), 793-801.
  • Hagerty, B. M. ve Patusky, K. (1995). Developing a measure of sense of belonging. Nursing Research, 44, 9–13.
  • Hill, L. H. (2006). Sense of belonging as connectedness, American Indian worldview, and mental health. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 20 (5), 210–216.
  • Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, L. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1-55.
  • Jones, W. H. ve Carver, M. D. (1991). Adjustment and coping implications of loneliness. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (eds .) Handbook of social and clinical psychology, 42 , 682-689.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1 (3), 180-186.
  • Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. ve İmamoğlu, O. E. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Social psychology, 142 (3), 333-351.
  • King, A. K., Vidourek, A. R., Davis, B. ve McClellan, W. ( 2002). Increasing self-esteem and School connectedness trough a multidimensional mentoring program. Journal of School Health. 72 (7), 294-299.
  • Leary, M.R., Kelly, K.M., Cottrell, C.A. ve Schreindorfer, L.S. (2006). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University.
  • Lee, R. M. ve Robbins, B. S. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42 (2), 232-241.
  • Lee, R. M. ve Robbins, S.B. (1998). The Relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, selfesteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45 (3), 338-345.
  • Levett-Jones, T., Lathlean, J., Maguire, J. ve McMillan, M. (2007). Belongingness: A critique of the concept and implications for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 27, 210–218.
  • Malone, G.P., Pillow, D. R. ve Osman, A. (2012). The General belongingness scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 311–316.
  • Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking press.
  • McMillan, D. M. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315–325.
  • McMillan, D. M. ve Chavis, D. W. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
  • McConnell, A.R., Shoda, T. M. ve Skulborstad, H. M. (2012). The Self as a collection of multiple self-aspects: structure, development, operation, and implications. Social Cognition, 30 (4) 380–395.
  • Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth , L., Hayashi, Y. ve Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 213–218.
  • Murray, A. S. (2004). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: A study of university student dating couples in 17 nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 38 (4), 407-432.
  • Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Research of Educational Research, 70 (3), 323-367.
  • Peled, E. ve Muzicant, A. (2008). The Meaning of home for runaway girls. Journal of CommunityPsychology, 36 (4), 434–451.
  • Pond, C. S. (1998). Acceptance and belonging: The promotion of acceptance and belonging within group Art Therapy. American Journal of Art Therapy. 36, 81-89.
  • Ryzin, M. J. V., Gravely, E. A. A. ve Roseth, C. R. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 38, 1–12.
  • Romano, D. M. (2004). A self-psychology approach to narcissistic personality disorder: A Nursing reflection. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 40 (1), 20-28.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent selfimage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Second Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hilsdale, New Jersey.
  • Simmons, C., Aysan, F., Thompson, D., Hamarat, E. ve Steele, D. (2002). Coping resource availability and level of perceived stress as predictors of life satisfaction in a cohort of Turkish college students. College Student Journal, 36 (1), 129-142.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A. ve Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063-1070.
Toplam 48 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Erdinç Duru

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 44

Kaynak Göster

APA Duru, E. (2015). Genel Aidiyet Ölçeğinin Psikometrik Özellikleri: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(44), 37-47.

!! From 30 November 2023, English language proofreading will be required for accepted articles to ensure language quality.