Development of Marital Forgiveness Scale in Turkish Culture: A Validity and Reliability of the Study

Year 2024, Volume: 14 Issue: 75, 538 - 554, 30.12.2024

Fatma Bıyık Sarı , Hüdayar Cıhan

https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1411217

Abstract

The capacity to forgive is a crucial aspect of marital relationships, as it enables couples to recover emotionally following a hurtful event caused by their spouse. The present study aimed to develop a marital forgiveness scale for Turkish culture, which is essential in cultural sensitivity. Accordingly, two distinct studies were conducted. The initial study utilizing Exploratory Factor Analysis was conducted with a sample of 351 married individuals, comprising 124 males and 227 females. The analysis yielded four dimensions, comprising 23 items, namely avoidance, desire for revenge, conditional forgiveness and unconditional forgiveness. The second study, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, was conducted with a total of 443 married participants, comprising 102 men and 341 women. The results provided support for the structure of the scale. The reliability analysis revealed that Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient value for each dimension was between .82 and .93. The criterion-related validity of the scale was examined using rumination as the criterion variable, with significant correlations observed between the developed scale and the rumination scale. Significant correlations were observed between The Marital Offense Specific Forgiveness Scale, the offense's severity, and the offense's significance with the developed scale, thereby supporting the convergent validity of the scale. The findings indicated that the Marital Forgiveness Scale, which had been developed for this purpose, was a reliable and valid measurement of marital forgiveness.

Keywords

forgiveness, married individuals, scale development, Turkish culture

Ethical Statement

Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee of the University approved the study (16/02/2021-2021/51).

References

• Amiri F., Moslemifar, M., Showani, E. & Panahi A. (2020). Effectiveness of forgiveness therapy in treatment of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and anger among female students with love trauma syndrome. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 10 (S1): 98-105.
• Aşçıoğlu Önal, A. & Yalçın, İ. (2017). Forgiveness of Others and Self Forgiveness: The predictive role of cognitive distortions, empathy, and rumination. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 17. 99-122. http://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.68.6.
• Asil, M. R., Abadi, A. S., Ganji, S. I., & Barainian, A. (2014). The effectiveness of forgiveness-based consultancy on marital conflicts of women with severe conflicts referring to court in Koohdasht Town. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 3(4), 13–19.
• Atçeken, M. (2014). Dindarlık, evlilik doyumu ve kişilik özelliklerinin bağışlama ile ilişkisi.[Relation of religiousness, marriage satisfaction and personal characteristics with forgiveness][Unpublished master’s thesis, Haliç University-İstanbul]. Turkish National Thesis Center
• Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention Studies on Forgiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00288.x
• Bıyık Sarı, F., & Cıhan, H. (2024). Marital Forgiveness Among Turkish Married Individuals: A Qualitative Study. Marriage & Family Review, 60(6), 343–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2024.2360104
• Bugay A. (2014). Measuring the differences in pairs' marital forgiveness scores: construct validity and links with relationship satisfaction. Psychological reports, 114(2), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.02.PR0.114k18w5
• Bugay, A. & Demir, A. (2010). A Turkish version of Heartland Forgiveness Scale. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1927–1931. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.390
• Bugay, A., & Mullet, E. (2013). Conceptualizing forgiveness, granting forgiveness, and seeking forgiveness: A Turkish-French Comparison. Review of European Studies, 5(5), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v5n5p187
• Cornish, M. A., Guyll, M., Wade, N. G., Lannin, D. G., Madon, S., & Chason, K. C.(2018). Does Empathy Promotion Necessarily Lead to Greater Forgiveness? An Experimental Examination. Current Psychology. http:://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9816-8
• Çelik,E., Çelik, B., Yavaş, Ş., & Süler, M. (2022). Investigation of marital satisfaction in terms of proactive personality, meaning in life, offense-specific forgiveness. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.1.348
• DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development. Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Donovan, L. A. N., & Priester, J. R. (2020). Exploring the Psychological Processes That Underlie Interpersonal Forgiveness: Replication and Extension of the Model of Motivated Interpersonal Forgiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02107 
• Durmuş, E. & Manap, A. (2018). Marital forgiveness scale-event: the validity and reliability of the Turkish version. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Educational Faculty, 18(4), 2033-2049. http://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018.18.41844-504877
• Enright, R. D., & Human Development Study Group. (1996). Counseling within the forgiveness triad: On forgiving, receiving, forgiveness, and self-forgiveness. Counseling and Values, 40(2), 107-126.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.1996.tb00844.x
• Erdur-Baker, Ö. & Bugay, A. (2010). The short version of ruminative response scale: reliability, validity and its relation to psychological symptoms. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2178–2181. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.433
• Erkan, Z. (2015). Adaptation of the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale for use in a Turkish cultural context. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(7), 1057–1070. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.7.1057
• Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 894–914. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019993 
• Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00016
• Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2004). Forgiveness and Conflict Resolution in Marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.72
• Fincham, F. D., Hall, J., & Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in Marriage: Current Status and Future Directions. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 55(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.callf.x-i1
• Fincham, F. D., Paleari, F. G., & Regalia, C. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: The role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00002
• Fincham, F.D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00001.x
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
• Gordon, K. C., Hughes, F. M., Tomcik, N. D., Dixon, L. J., & Litzinger, S. C. (2009). Widening spheres of impact: The role of forgiveness in marital and family functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014354
• Gordon, K.C.,& Baucom, D.H. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: Preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 179–199. http://doi.org/10.1080/01926180390167188.
• Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.6
• Gottman, J. M. (2011). The science of trust: Emotional attunement for couples. W W Norton & Co.
• Goztepe G. I. & Kislak S. (2019). The predictive role of forgiveness and the level of repetitive thinking on mental health and marital adjustment in married individuals. Dusunen Adam-The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 32, 236-245. https://doi.org/10.14744/dajpns.2019.00033
• Harper, Q., Worthington, E. L., Jr, Griffin, B. J., Lavelock, C. R., Hook, J. N., Vrana, S. R., & Greer, C. L. (2014). Efficacy of a workbook to promote forgiveness: a randomized controlled trial with university students. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(12), 1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22079
• He, Q., Zhong, M., Tong, W., Lan, J., Li, X., Ju, X., & Fang, X. (2018). Forgiveness, marital quality, and marital stability in the early years of Chinese marriage: An actor–partner interdependence mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01520
• Ho, M., & Fung, H. (2011). A dynamic process model of forgiveness: A cross-cultural perspective. Review of General Psychology, 15(1), s. 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022605
• Ho, M. Y., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2020). Is the concept of forgiveness universal? A cross-cultural perspective comparing Western and Eastern cultures. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 39(5), 1749–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9875-x
• Hook, J., Worthington, E., & Utsey, S. (2009). Collectivism, forgiveness, and social harmony. Counseling Psychologist, 37(6), 821–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008326546
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 
• Joo, M., Terzino, K. A., Cross, S. E., Yamaguchi, N., & Ohbuchi, K. (2019). How Does Culture Shape Conceptions of Forgiveness? Evidence From Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(5), 676–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119845502
• Karadoğan, F.M. & Tagay, O., (2022). Predictive Role of Attachment Styles and Emotion Regulation on Forgiveness in Married People. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry 14, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1117537
• Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the Power to Forgive: When the Experience of Power Increases Interpersonal Forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1010-1023.  http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210376761 
• Karremans, J. C., Regalia, C., Paleari, F. G., Fincham, F. D., Cui, M., Takada, N., Ohbuchi, K.I., Terzino, K., Cross, S. E., & Uskul, A. K. (2011). Maintaining Harmony Across the Globe: The Cross-Cultural Association Between Closeness and Interpersonal Forgiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(5), 443–451.https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610396957
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
• Leggett, D. G., Roberts-Pittman, B., Byczek, S., & Morse, D. T. (2012). Cooperation, conflict, and marital satisfaction: Bridging theory, research, and practice. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(2), 182–199.
• McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.43
• McCullough, M. E., Bellah, C. G., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being, and the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 601–610. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275008
• McCullough, M. E., Bono, G., & Root, L. M. (2007). Rumination, emotion, and forgiveness: Three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 490–505. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.490 
• McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
• Novak, J. R., Smith, H. M., Larson, J. H., & Crane, D. R. (2017). Commitment, Forgiveness, and Relationship Self-Regulation: An Actor Partner Interdependence Model of Relationship Virtues and Relationship Effort in Couple Relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(2), 353–365. doi:10.1111/jmft.12258 
• Orbon, M, Mercado J, & Balila J (2015). Effects of forgiveness therapy on recovery among residents of drug rehabilitation centers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 165:12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.599
• Osei-Tutu, A., Dzokoto, V.A., Oti-Boadi, M., Belgrave, F.Z., & Appiah-Danquah, R. (2018). Explorations of Forgiveness in Ghanaian Marriages. Psychological Studies, 64, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0471-9
• Ozgun, S. (2010). The predictors of the traumatic effect of extramarital infidelity on married women: Coping strategies, resources, and forgiveness. [Unpublished Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University-Ankara]. Turkish National Thesis Center
• Özgür, H., & Eldeleklioğlu, J. (2017). REACH affetme modelinin Türk kültürü üzerinde etkililiğinin incelenmesi [Analyzing the effect of REACH Forgiveness Model on the Turkish culture]. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 5(1), 98-112.
• Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. (2005). Marital Quality, Forgiveness, Empathy, and Rumination: A Longitudinal Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 368–378. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271597 
• Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2009). Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: The Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS). Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016068
• Sandage, S. J., & Williamson, I. (2005). Forgiveness in cultural context. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 41-55). New York: Brunner Routledge.
• Sandage, S. J., Crabtree, S. A., & Bell, C. A. (2020). Forgiveness and culture: Conceptual issues. In E. L. Worthington, Jr., & N.Wade (Eds.),Handbook of forgiveness(2nd ed., pp. 201–211). Routledge.
• Sandilya, G. & Shahnawaz, G. (2014). Willingness to Forgive the Spouse: A Qualitative Study. Psychological Studies, 59, 413-418. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12646-014-0277-3.
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
• Taysi, E., Vural, D. Forgiveness Education for Fourth Grade Students in Turkey. Child Indicators Research, 9, 1095–1115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9364-9
• Woldarsky Meneses, C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2012). Interpersonal forgiveness in Emotion-focused Couples’ Therapy: Relating process to outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40(1), 49–67. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00330.x 
• Worthington, E. L., Jr., Mazzeo, S. E., & Canter, D. E. (2005). Forgiveness-promoting approach: Helping clients REACH forgiveness through using a longer model that teaches reconciliation. In L. Sperry & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), Spiritually oriented psychotherapy (pp. 235–257). American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/10886-010
• Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
• Yaman Akpınar, T. & Altunsu Sönmez, Ö. (2021). Relationship between marital offense-specific forgiveness and marital adjustment. Journal of Social Science of Mus Alparslan University, 9, 203-210. http://doi.org/ 10.18506/anemon.772923
• Zhou, Y. (2019). A mixed methods model of scale development and validation analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 17(1), 38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2018.1479088