Virtual Reality Glasses (Cardboard VR): A New Tool for The Assessment of Nystagmus

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 4, 101 - 104, 24.01.2023

Remzi Doğan , Nazan Değirmenci

https://doi.org/10.26650/Tr-ENT.2022.1163309

Öz

Objective: Virtual reality (VR) glasses are tools that provide a more realistic perception of the image viewed from mobile phones. The aim of this study was to assess nystagmus with Cardboard VR, the most widely used and simplest form of VR glasses, and to compare the findings with those obtained via conventional Frenzel goggles. Materials and Methods: A total of 97 patients were included in the study. Balance tests were performed at one-hour intervals using Cardboard VR and Frenzel goggles. Direction, frequency, and duration of nystagmus were recorded during the examinations. Following the examinations, patients using both glasses were asked to rate the general comfort and holding quality of the glasses on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: No significant difference was found between the two glasses in terms of the direction of nystagmus (p>.05). There was no significant difference between the two glasses (Cardboard VR vs Frenzel goggles) in terms of frequency (0.73±0.29 beats/sec and 0.86±0.39 beats/sec, respectively) (p>.05). There was no significant difference between the two glasses in terms of the duration of observation (18.58±5.54 sec and 20.54±6.40 sec, respectively)(p>.05). The VAS score of the Carton VR was found to be significantly higher than that of the Frenzel goggles (8.69±1.02 and 5.24±1.31, respectively) (p=0.001). Conclusion: Cardboard VR is an easy-to-use, easily accessible, inexpensive, and effective tool that can be used to assess nystagmus under polyclinic and emergency conditions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dizziness, positional vertigo, vertigo, peripheral, virtual reality

Kaynakça

• 1. West PD, Sheppard ZA, King EV. Comparison of techniques for identification of peripheral vestibular Nystagmus. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126(12):1209-15. google scholar
• 2. Tsapakis S, Papaconstantinou D, Diagourtas A, Droutsas K, Andreanos K, Moschos MM, et al. Visual field examination method using virtual reality glasses compared with the Humphrey perimeter. Clin Ophthalmol 2017;11:1431-43. google scholar
• 3. Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Collan J, Kinnunen R, Rezai Jahromi B, Hernesniemi J. Virtual Reality Glasses and «Eye-Hands Blind Technique» for Microsurgical Training in Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2018;112:126-30. google scholar
• 4. Strupp M, Fischer C, HanR L, Bayer O. The takeaway Frenzel goggles: a Fresnel-based device. Neurology 2014;83(14):1241-5. google scholar
• 5. Ben-David Y, Hafner H, Fradis M, Krasnitz G, Podoshin L. Do Frenzel glasses have a place in the modern electronystagmography laboratory? Am J Otol 1996;17(1):89-92. google scholar
• 6. Strauss P, Meyer zum Gottesberge A. Caloric nystagmus: ENG in comparison with observation by Frenzel’s glasses. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1979;25:134-7. google scholar
• 7. Baba S, Fukumoto A, Aoyagi M, Koizumi Y, Ikezono T, Yagi T. A comparative study on the observation of spontaneous nystagmus with Frenzel glasses and an infrared CCD camera. J Nippon Med Sch 2004;71(1):25-9. google scholar