Analysis of Factors Affecting Academic Success with Machine Learning: Data-Driven Inferences in Education

Year 2026, Volume: 10 Issue: 1 , 48 - 62 , 16.12.2025

Ayşe Alkan

https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1779491

https://izlik.org/JA57MG97MC

Abstract

With the digital transformation in education, big data analytics is increasingly being used to understand, monitor, and improve students' academic performance. Analyzing student behavior, engagement levels, prior achievements, and study habits enables the creation of more effective and personalized learning environments. This study aimed to predict academic achievement from student data using machine learning (ML) algorithms and to identify the factors affecting achievement. Seven different algorithms were implemented for this purpose: SVM, LR, KNN, RF, NB, DT, and LDA. The RF, SVM, and LDA algorithms achieved the highest accuracy rate of 91%. The LDA model was determined to be the most successful model in terms of accuracy and balance performance. Analysis revealed that variables such as class participation, study time, and prior achievement level significantly impact student achievement. The findings demonstrate that self-management, self-regulation, and intrinsic motivation skills play a critical role in academic success. Consequently, machine learning-based models have strong potential for predicting student achievement and identifying at-risk students early. This study highlights the importance of data-driven decision-making processes in education and guides future research on AI-supported applications

Keywords

Machine learning , Artificial intelligence , Academic success , Education

References

• Bandura. A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
• Zimmerman. B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
• Deci. E. L.. & Ryan. R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Martin. A. J.. & Marsh. H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267–281.
• Selwyn. N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
• Turing A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery And Intelligence. Mind. LIX No, 236-433.
• Xue. Y.. & Wang. Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence for education and teaching. Wireless Communications and MobileComputing.
• Obschonka. M.. & Audretsch. D. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and big data entrepreneurship: a new era has begun. Small Business Economics, 55, 529-539.
• Alpaydin. E. (2020). Introduction to Machine Learning. fourth editio,. MIT Press.
• Koza. J. R.. Bennett. F. H.. Andre. D.. & Keane. M. A. (1996). Automated Design of Both the Topology and Sizing of Analog Electrical Circuits Using Genetic Programming. Içinde J. S. Gero & F. Sudweeks (Ed.). Artificial Intelligence in Design ’96, Springer Netherlands.
• Lantz. B. (2019). Machine Learning with R: Expert techniques for predictive modeling. 3rd Edition. Packt Publishing Ltd.
• Agarwal. S. (2013). Data Mining: Data Mining Concepts and Techniques. 2013 International Conference on Machine Intelligence and Research Advancement,203-207.
• Luan. H.. & Tsai. C.-C. (2021). A Review of Using Machine Learning Approaches for Precision Education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 250-266.
• Djulovic. A.. & Li. D. (2013). Towards freshman retention prediction: A comparative study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(5), 494-500.
• Sara. N.-B.. Halland. R.. Igel. C.. & Alstrup. S. (2015). High-school dropout prediction using machine learning: A Danish large-scale study. ESANN 2015 proceedings. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. Computational Intelligence, 319-324.
• Sivakumar. S.. Venkataraman. S.. & Selvaraj. R. (2016). Predictive modeling of student dropout indicators in educational data mining using improved decision tree. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(4), 1-5.
• Chung. J. Y.. & Lee. S. (2019). Dropout early warning systems for high school students using machine learning. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 346-353.
• Zerkouk. M.. Mihoubi. M.. Chikhaoui. B.. & Wang. S. (2024). A machine learning based model for student’s dropout prediction in online training. Education and Information Technologies, 1-20.
• Mishra. T.. Kumar. D.. & Gupta. S. (2014). Mining students’ data for prediction performance. 2014 Fourth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies, 255-262.
• Badal. Y. T.. & Sungkur. R. K. (2022). Predictive modelling and analytics of students’ grades using machine learning algorithms. Education and Information Technologies, 1-31.
• Çakıt. E.. & Dağdeviren. M. (2022). Predicting the percentage of student placement: A comparative study of machine learning algorithms. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 997-1022.
• Ben Said. M.. Hadj Kacem. Y.. Algarni. A.. & Masmoudi. A. (2024). Early prediction of Student academic performance based on Machine Learning algorithms: A case study of bachelor’s degree students in KSA. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 13247-13270.
• Hadj Kacem. Y.. Alshehri. S.. & Qaid. T. (2022). Categorizing Well-Written Course Learning Outcomes Using Machine Learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 21, 61-75.
• Abdelhafez. H. A.. & Elmannai. H. (2022). Developing and comparing data mining algorithms that work best for predicting student performance. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 18(1), 1-14.
• Basnet. R. B.. Johnson. C.. & Doleck. T. (2022). Dropout prediction in Moocs using deep learning and machine learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11499-11513.
• Soleimani. F.. Lee. J.. & Yilmaz Soylu. M. (2024). Analyzing learners engagement in a micromasters program compared to non-degree MOOC. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(3), 233-247.
• Sperling. K.. Stenliden. L.. Nissen. J.. & Heintz. F. (2022). Still w (AI) ting for the automation of teaching: An exploration of machine learning in Swedish primary education using Actor‐Network Theory. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 584-600.
• Dolawattha. D. M.. Premadasa. H. S.. & Jayaweera. P. M. (2022). Evaluating sustainability of mobile learning framework for higher education: a machine learning approach. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(3), 266-281. Sanusi. I. T.. Oyelere. S. S.. Vartiainen. H.. Suhonen. J.. & Tukiainen. M. (2023). A systematic review of teaching and learning machine learning in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5967-5997.
• Wusylko. C.. Weisberg. L.. Opoku. R. A.. Abramowitz. B.. Williams. J.. Xing. W.. ... & Vu. M. (2024). Using machine learning techniques to investigate learner engagement with TikTok media literacy campaigns. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(1), 72-93.
• Iatrellis. O.. Savvas. I. K.. Fitsilis. P.. & Gerogiannis. V. C. (2021). A two-phase machine learning approach for predicting student outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 69-88.
• Cardona. T.. Cudney. E. A.. Hoerl. R.. & Snyder. J. (2023). Data mining and machine learning retention models in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research. Theory & Practice, 25(1), 51-75.
• Zhou. T.. & Jiao. H. (2023). Exploration of the stacking ensemble machine learning algorithm for cheating detection in large-scale assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(4), 831-854.
• 34.Student Performance Factors. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/lainguyn123/student-performance-factors. Access date October 11. 2024.
• Kılınç, D., Borandağ, E., Yücalar, F., Tunali, V., Şi̇mşek, M., & Özçi̇ft, A. (2016). KNN Algoritması ve R Dili ile Metin Madenciliği Kullanılarak Bilimsel Makale Tasnifi. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7240/mufbed.69674.
• Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2006). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (Second edition) (2nd bs). Kaufmann Publisher.
• Dimitoglou, G., Adams, J. A., & Jim, C. M. (2012). Comparison of the C4.5 and a Naive Bayes Classifier for the Prediction of Lung Cancer Survivability (arXiv:1206.1121).arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1206.1121
• Liang, Y.-C., Maimury, Y., Chen, A. H.-L., & Juarez, J. R. C. (2020). Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Air Quality. Applied Sciences, 10(24), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249151
• Canibey, S. T., & Sevli, O. (2022). Bireylerin Gelir Dağılım Seviyelerinin Makine Öğrenmesi Teknikleri İle Belirlenmesi. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 753-766.
• Jain, R., Bekele, S.K., Palaniappan, D., Parmar, K., Premavathi, T. (2025). Employing Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Precision in Potato and Maize Leaf Disease Detection and Classification. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9 (2), 290-301.
• Aydın, O., & Raja, N. B. (2025). Using Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Flood Events in Artvin, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9 (2), 189-201.
• Toprak, N. & Yalman, Y. (2025). Ship Detection from Optical Satellite Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9 (2), 342-353.
• Feizizadeh, B., Yariyan, P., Yakar, M., Blaschke, T., & Almuraqab, N. A. S. (2025). An integrated hybrid deep learning data driven approaches for spatiotemporal mapping of land susceptibility to salt/dust emissions. Advances in Space Research.
• Ethiraj, N., Sivabalan, T. Sofia, J. Harika, D. Nikolova , M.P. (2025). A comprehensive review on application of machine intelligence in additive manufacturing. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9 (1), 37-46.