Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via dSPACE DS1104

Year 2026, Volume: 10 Issue: 2 , 534 - 547 , 01.05.2026
https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1828170
https://izlik.org/JA28SY55HM

Abstract

The accelerating adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) demands compact and high-efficiencient EV battery charger. The DC–DC converters is the key element of EV charger to ensure reliable battery charging under diverse operating conditions. This paper presents a comparative simulation–hardware co-validation framework of 56V charging voltage and 15A for evaluating a non-isolated Single-Ended Primary Inductor Converter (SEPIC) and an isolated Full-Bridge (FB) DC–DC converter in identical operating conditions. Experimental validation is performed on reduced-scale hardware prototypes using a dSPACE DS1104 real-time control platform. Performance comparison is carried out for duty-cycle, output voltage ripple contents, semiconductor stress and efficiency of the converter. Results from both simulation and hardware testing shows that the FB converter operates 4-6 % more efficiently and produces significantly 30% lower output voltage ripple than the SEPIC converter under rated conditions. The proposed co-validation framework effectively integrates simulation and hardware testing and provides practical design insights for next-generation EV battery chargers.

References

  • Aslan, N., Kılıc, E., & Şekkeli, M. (2023). Modeling of electric vehicles as a load of the distribution grid. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, 7(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1165750
  • Ayci, T., Barlas, B., & Olcer, A. I. (2025). Evaluation on fire incident of electric vehicle spaces onboard ferries using fire dynamics simulations. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 11(2), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.14744/thermal.0000925
  • Çetin, M. S., Gençoğlu, M. T., & Dobrzycki, A. (2024). Investigation of charging technologies for electric vehicles. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 19(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.55525/tjst.1399120
  • Karaarslan, A. (2019). The simulation and implementation of SEPIC converter for computer systems. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 12(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.540127
  • Ekici, Ö., Najafi, A., & Dirisaglik, F. (2021). 600 W DC–DC converter design using flyback, half bridge, full bridge LLC topologies and comparison of simulation results. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 16, 219–224. https://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1068614
  • Gupta, J., Kushwaha, R., Singh, B., & Khadkikar, V. (2020). Improved power quality charging system based on high step-down gain bridgeless SEPIC APFC for light electric vehicles. IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 871–877. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE44975.2020.9235415
  • Gupta, J., Maurya, R., & Arya, S. R. (2020). On-board electric vehicle battery charger with improved power quality and reduced switching stress. IET Power Electronics, 13(13), 2885–2894. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2019.0962
  • Kong, P., Aziz, J., Sahid, M. R., & Wen Yao, L. (2014). A bridgeless PFC converter for on-board battery charger. IEEE Conference on Energy Conversion (CENCON). https://doi.org/10.1109/CENCON.2014.6967534
  • Kushwaha, R., & Singh, B. (2019). An improved SEPIC PFC converter for electric vehicle battery charger. IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2019.8912344
  • Sivakumar, N., Raja, S. C., Saravanan, M., & Xavier, S. A. E. (2023). Analysis of the performance of energy transfer system (ETS) for EV battery charging using non-isolated SEPIC converter-based CCCV control. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems (ICEES), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEES57979.2023.10110262
  • Khather, S., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2020). Modeling and simulation of SEPIC controlled converter using PID controller. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 11(2), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v11.i2.pp833-843
  • Gohil, S. N., Shah, H. A., & Gauswami, A. R. (2024). Design and simulation of SEPIC converter for EV battery charger. SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 11(11), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V11I11P110
  • Abdalla, A., & Ali, I. (2024). Analysis of SEPIC converter at different switching frequencies. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research, 12, 1374–1381. https://doi.org/10.37391/ijeer.120431
  • Karthikeyan, B., Shanmugasundaram, V., Palanisamy, R., Alam, M., & Al-Mdallal, Q. (2025). A sunflower optimization–based modified high step-up SEPIC converter for electric vehicle applications. Scientific Reports, 15, 17384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99994-7
  • Vendoti, S., Sekhar, A. H., Bharadwaja, A. V., Kommula, B. N., Sateesh, R., Prabhakar, S., Arunkumar, M., & Cui, Y. (2025). Grid-connected improved SEPIC converter with intelligent MPPT for railway applications. Scientific Reports, 15, 13192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96704-1
  • Çakmak, R., & Dündar, A. (2023). Design and implementation of a real-time demonstration setup for dynamic highway tunnel lighting control research studies. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 7(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1013374
  • Çiçek, M., Gençtürk, M., Balcı, S., & Sabancı, K. (2022). The modelling, simulation, and implementation of wireless power transfer for an electric vehicle charging station. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 6(3), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.930933
  • Çetin, E., & Yaz, M. (2021). Built-in isolated level 1 unidirectional battery charger design aspects for a small-scale electric vehicle. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, 5(4), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..984760
  • Lyu, D., Soeiro, T. B., & Bauer, P. (2023). Design and implementation of a reconfigurable phase-shift full-bridge converter for wide voltage range EV charging application. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 9(1), 1200–1214. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2022.3176826
  • Jeong, S.-W., Lee, S.-H., Kwon, D.-H., Kim, J.-Y., & Kim, J.-K. (2023). Two-transformer phase-shift full-bridge converter with new rectifier for reducing conduction loss. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38(12), 15634-15644. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2023.3303917
  • Krismer, F. (2010). Accurate small-signal model for the digital control of an automotive bidirectional dual active bridge. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 24, 2756–2768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2009.2027904
  • Rao, K. V. G., Kumar, M. K., Goud, B. S., Bajaj, M., Houran, M. A., & Kamel, S. (2022). Design of a bidirectional DC/DC converter for hybrid electric drive system with dual-battery storing energy. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 972089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.972089
  • Fan, H., & Li, H. (2010). High-frequency high-efficiency bidirectional DC–DC converter module design for 10 kVA solid-state transformer. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2010.5433670
  • Kamalakar, P., Kumar, B. S., & Upendar, J. (2024). Performance enhancement of hybrid-type full-bridge DC/DC converter with fuzzy MPPT for PV power extraction. SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 11(7), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V11I7P126
  • Elangovan, D., Reddy, M. S. K., Tania, H. M., & Saravana Kumar, R. (2016). Design, simulation and implementation of current fed isolated full bridge DC–DC with voltage multiplier for fuel cell grid applications. Energy Procedia, 90, 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.226
  • Sharma, A., & Agarwal, V. (2021). Performance analysis of full-bridge DC–DC converter for EV applications. RARES 2021 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3808509
  • Mohan, N., Undeland, T. M., & Robbins, W. P. (2003). Power electronics: Converters, applications, and design (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • Erickson, R. W., & Maksimović, D. (2020). Fundamentals of power electronics (3rd ed.). Springer.
  • Adewuyi, P., & Adebajo, G. (2025). Power factor correction: performance comparison between microcontroller-based and neuro-fuzzy systems. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(3), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1593597
  • Truong, N.-V. (2012). Hardware-in-the-loop approach to controller design and testing of motion control systems using xPC Target. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (ICIAS), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAS.2012.6306171
  • Kumar, P. (2025). An ANFIS-based grid-connected renewable source bidirectional SEPIC converter multifunctional EV charger with reduced peak and disturbances. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10, 1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i29s.4769
  • Kumar, M., Choudhury, B., & Pathak, M. (2025). A modified bridgeless SEPIC-assisted improved power quality EV charger. IEEE ICEPE 2025, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE65965.2025.11139564
  • Texas Instruments. (2022). UCC28950/UCC28951 600-W, phase-shifted, full-bridge application report (SLUA560D, Revised March 2022). Texas Instruments. https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slua560
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Circuits and Systems, Electrical Engineering (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Alpeshbharathi Gauswami 0009-0002-2082-6531

Hardik Shah 0000-0001-8997-5426

Submission Date November 24, 2025
Acceptance Date February 10, 2026
Publication Date May 1, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1828170
IZ https://izlik.org/JA28SY55HM
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gauswami, A., & Shah, H. (2026). A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via dSPACE DS1104. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 10(2), 534-547. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1828170
AMA 1.Gauswami A, Shah H. A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via dSPACE DS1104. TUJE. 2026;10(2):534-547. doi:10.31127/tuje.1828170
Chicago Gauswami, Alpeshbharathi, and Hardik Shah. 2026. “A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via DSPACE DS1104”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 10 (2): 534-47. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1828170.
EndNote Gauswami A, Shah H (May 1, 2026) A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via dSPACE DS1104. Turkish Journal of Engineering 10 2 534–547.
IEEE [1]A. Gauswami and H. Shah, “A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via dSPACE DS1104”, TUJE, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 534–547, May 2026, doi: 10.31127/tuje.1828170.
ISNAD Gauswami, Alpeshbharathi - Shah, Hardik. “A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via DSPACE DS1104”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 10/2 (May 1, 2026): 534-547. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1828170.
JAMA 1.Gauswami A, Shah H. A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via dSPACE DS1104. TUJE. 2026;10:534–547.
MLA Gauswami, Alpeshbharathi, and Hardik Shah. “A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via DSPACE DS1104”. Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, May 2026, pp. 534-47, doi:10.31127/tuje.1828170.
Vancouver 1.Alpeshbharathi Gauswami, Hardik Shah. A Comparative Simulation–Hardware Co-Validation Framework for SEPIC and Full-Bridge DC–DC Converters in Electric Vehicle Battery Charging via dSPACE DS1104. TUJE. 2026 May 1;10(2):534-47. doi:10.31127/tuje.1828170
Flag Counter