Research Article

Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR

Volume: 6 Number: 1 January 30, 2022
EN

Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR

Abstract

Multipath, which is a major source of error for precise positioning, is the effect that occurs when Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signals reach the receiver by reflecting from one or more surfaces. Reflected signals affect the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) data provided by the receiver, indicating the signal strength. The structure of the antenna of the receiver and the direction in which it is oriented also change the strength of the received signal. In this study, the effect of antenna orientation and polarization on SNR data was demonstrated by using the method called GNSS-Interferometric Reflectometry (GNSS-IR), in terms of reflector height estimates. A geodetic GNSS receiver (CHC i50) and two different smartphones (Xiaomi Mi8 and Xiaomi Mi8 Lite) were used in the four-day experiments. The geodetic receiver was established as zenith-looking (ZL) in the first two days and as horizon-looking (HL) in the last two days. Smartphones were placed on the same mast with the HL receiver in the last two days. It was seen that it is more appropriate to use a 0°-60° satellite elevation angle range in the common use of all receivers’ data. In the 30°-60° range where the ZL installation receives the multipath signals weakly, it has been found that the HL receiver and smartphones have reflector height estimation accuracies with values ranging from 1.9 cm to 2.5 cm. In short, for different elevation angle ranges, accuracies below 2 cm could be obtained with each receiver. Thus, different antenna configurations may be used in GNSS-IR studies, depending on the characteristics of the study area and the surface feature to be determined.

Keywords

References

  1. Altuntas C & Tunalioglu N (2020a). Estimation performance of soil moisture with GPS-IR method. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 38(4), 2217-2230.
  2. Altuntas C & Tunalioglu N (2020b). An experimental study on the effect of antenna orientation on GNSS-IR. 1st Intercontinental Geoinformation Days, pp. 244-247.
  3. Anderson K D (2000). Determination of water level and tides using interferometric observations of GPS signals. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 17(8), 1118-1127, doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1118:DOWLAT>2.0.CO;2.
  4. Bilich A, Larson K M & Axelrad P (2008). Modeling GPS phase multipath with SNR: Case study from the Salar de Uyuni, Boliva, Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, B04401, doi:10.1029/2007JB005194.
  5. Chen Q, Won D & Akos D M (2014). Snow depth sensing using the GPS L2C signal with a dipole antenna. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 1(106). doi:10.1186/1687-6180-2014-106.
  6. Gutmann E D, Larson K M, Williams M W, Nievinski F G & Zavorotny V (2012). Snow measurement by GPS interferometric reflectometry: an evaluation at Niwot Ridge, Colorado. Hydrological Processes, 26(19), 2951-2961, doi:10.1002/hyp.8329.
  7. Han M, Zhu Y, Yang D, Chang Q, Hong X & Song S (2020). Soil moisture monitoring using GNSS interference signal: proposing a signal reconstruction method. Remote Sensing Letters, 11(4), 373-382. DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2020.1718235.
  8. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H & Wasle E (2007). GNSS–global navigation satellite systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more. Springer Science & Business Media.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 30, 2022

Submission Date

January 29, 2021

Acceptance Date

March 28, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Altuntaş, C., & Tunalıoğlu, N. (2022). Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 6(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.870620
AMA
1.Altuntaş C, Tunalıoğlu N. Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR. TUJE. 2022;6(1):87-94. doi:10.31127/tuje.870620
Chicago
Altuntaş, Cemali, and Nursu Tunalıoğlu. 2022. “Retrieving the SNR Metrics With Different Antenna Configurations for GNSS-IR”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 6 (1): 87-94. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.870620.
EndNote
Altuntaş C, Tunalıoğlu N (January 1, 2022) Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR. Turkish Journal of Engineering 6 1 87–94.
IEEE
[1]C. Altuntaş and N. Tunalıoğlu, “Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR”, TUJE, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 87–94, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.31127/tuje.870620.
ISNAD
Altuntaş, Cemali - Tunalıoğlu, Nursu. “Retrieving the SNR Metrics With Different Antenna Configurations for GNSS-IR”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 6/1 (January 1, 2022): 87-94. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.870620.
JAMA
1.Altuntaş C, Tunalıoğlu N. Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR. TUJE. 2022;6:87–94.
MLA
Altuntaş, Cemali, and Nursu Tunalıoğlu. “Retrieving the SNR Metrics With Different Antenna Configurations for GNSS-IR”. Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 87-94, doi:10.31127/tuje.870620.
Vancouver
1.Cemali Altuntaş, Nursu Tunalıoğlu. Retrieving the SNR metrics with different antenna configurations for GNSS-IR. TUJE. 2022 Jan. 1;6(1):87-94. doi:10.31127/tuje.870620

Cited By

Flag Counter