A systematic review study on different kinds of interlocking concrete blocks designs and properties

Abstract

Interlocking concrete blocks (ICBs) have been recently used worldwide to be alternative conventional blocks. ICBs are more sustainable, low involve low production cost, and environment-friendly as they emit less carbon dioxide than normal ones. ICBs have been used particularly in war zones and places affected by natural disasters where the need for quick, sustainable, low-cost buildings and earthquake-resistant buildings is indispensable. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review about different types of ICBs. It aims to demonstrate different configurations of ICBs incorporated with recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) and other additive materials used for construction. To achieve this, the compares different related studies which analyse the compressive strength results of RCA mixtures with different RCA replacements, w/c ratio, and mix proportions. Additionally, the paper discusses several techniques and methods to improve the behaviour of ICBs.

Keywords

• Compressive strength
• Recycled aggregate
• Concrete block
• Interlocking.

References

1. Abdel-Hay A S (2017). Properties of recycled concrete aggregate under different curing conditions. HBRC Journal, 13(3), 271–276.
2. Ajmani H Al, Suleiman F, Abuzayed I & Tamimi A (2019). Evaluation of concrete strength made with recycled aggregate. Buildings, 9, 1–14.
3. Akhtar A & Sarmah A K (2018). Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production.
4. Ali M, Gultom R J & Chouw N (2012). Capacity of innovative interlocking blocks under monotonic loading. Construction and Building Materials, 37, 812–821. 002
5. Deepak B (2012). Sustainable Dry Interlocking Block Masonry Construction. 15th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference. Brazil, 1–11.
6. Ferriz-Papi J A & Thomas S (2020). Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition Waste in the Production of Concrete Blocks. Journal of Construction Materials, 2(1).
7. Ganesh S Jai & Lokeshwaran N (2017). Experimental investigation on behavior of shear wall assembled with interlocking concrete block. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(3), 111–117.
8. Guo Z, Tu A, Chen C & Lehman D E (2018). Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of concrete building blocks incorporating recycled concrete aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production.

9. Haener J A (2005). Two piece interlocking block system (Patent No. 20060150559).
10. Hamad B S & Dawi A H (2017). Sustainable normal and high strength recycled aggregate concretes using crushed tested cylinders as coarse aggregates. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 7(August 2017), 228–239.
11. Huang Q, Lin L, Tan E L & Singh B (2017). Mix Design of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Using Packing Density Method. 1st International Conference on Structural Engineering Research (ICSER 2017), 8.
12. Kintingu S H (2009). Design of interlocking bricks for enhanced wall construction, flexibility, alignment accuracy and load bearing [Warwick university].
13. Kong D, Lei T, Zheng J, Ma C, Jiang J & Jiang J (2010). Effect and mechanism of surface-coating pozzalanics materials around aggregate on properties and ITZ microstructure of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 24(5), 701–708.
14. Kumar T P & Vigneshvar R (2014). Development of an Innovative Interlock Blocks. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology Print, 1(5), 114–118.
15. Lee Y H, Shek P N & Mohammad S (2017). Structural performance of reinforced interlocking blocks column. Construction and Building Materials, 142, 469–481.
16. Manasa S, Udaybhaskar M & Kumar G N (2019). Performance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete for M25 Grade Concrete. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 9(2).
17. Mirasa A K & Chong C-S (2020). The Construction of Green Building Using Interlocking Brick System. In A. Z. Yaser (Ed.), Green Engineering for Campus Sustainability (pp. 35–49). Springer Nature Singapore.
18. Nagaraja Ba, Vinay K V A, Keerthi Gowda B S, & Karisiddappa B. (2017). A study on slump and compressive strength of recycled aggregates embedded concrete. Innovations & Advances in Civil Engineering and Earth Science At: Chamarajanagar, Karnataka, India.
19. Onyeakpa C & Onundi L (2014). Improvement on the Design and Construction of Interlocking Blocks and its Moulding Machine. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 11(2), 49–66.
20. Opara H E, Eziefula U G & Ugwuegbu C C (2016). Experimental Study of Pervious Concrete Using Recycled Coarse Aggregate. International Journal of Materials and Structural Integrity, 10(4), 123–132.
21. Ozalp F, Yilmaz H D, Aydin O F, Kara M & Kilic Y (2017). Effects of using recycled concrete as aggregate on the engineering properties of concrete. National Symposium on the Use of Recycled Materials in Engineering Construction Journal, 9.
22. Ozbakkaloglu T, Gholampour A & Xie T (2018). Mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete: Effect of recycled aggregate properties and content. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(2), 13.
23. Pacheco J & de Brito J (2019). Structural reliability of recycled aggregate concrete. In New Trends in Eco-efficient and Recycled Concrete. Woodhead Publishing.
24. Pavlu T, Fortova K, Divis J & Hajek P (2019). The utilization of recycled masonry aggregate and recycled EPS for concrete blocks for mortarless masonry. Materials, 12, 1923.
25. Purushothaman R, Amirthavalli R R & Karan L (2015). Influence of treatment methods on the strength and performance characteristics of recycled aggregate concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(5).
26. Pavan P S, Babitha Rani H, Deepika Girish, Raghavendra K M, Vinod P N, Dushyanth.V.Babu.R ,& Shaik Numan (2018). A study on recycled concrete aggregates. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(18), 3239–3263.
27. Sabai M M, Cox M G D M, Mato R R, Egmond E L C & Lichtenberg J J N (2013). Concrete block production from construction and demolition waste in Tanzania. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 72, 9–19.
28. Safiee N A, Nasir M, N A, A, & A F, & Abu Bakar N (2018). Behaviour of interlocking mortarless hollow block walls under in-plane loading. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 19(2), 87–95.
29. Sarath P, Pradeep P, & Shemy S. Babu. (2015a). Investigation on Strength Parameters of Interlocking Hollow Block Strengthened with Steel Fibres. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 5(8), 111– 117
30. Sarath P, Pradeep P & Shemy S B (2015a). Performance of Steel Fibre Reinforced Interlocking Hollow Block as Load Bearing Wall. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 12(5), 38–46.
31. Sayanthan R, Ilamaran S, Rafiudeen M R & Nanayakkara S M A (2013). Development of Interlocking Lightweight Cement Blocks. In Special Session on Construction Materials & Systems, 4th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management 2013, Kandy, Sri Lanka, December, 194–202.
32. Shaban W M, Yang J, Su H, Mo K H, Li L & Xie J (2019). Quality improvement techniques for recycled concrete aggregate: A review. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 17, 151–167.
33. Taffese W Z (2018). Suitability Investigation of Recycled Concrete Aggregates for Concrete Production: An Experimental Case Study. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 11.
34. Tembhurne R S, Makwana M M & Kulkarni M S (2018). Strength & Durability Parameter of Recycled Concrete Aggregate. International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 5(3), 1–10.
35. Wani M V & Kumar C (2018). Behaviour of Interlocking Hollow Concrete Blocks. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), 2(4).
36. Watile R K, Deshmukh S K & Muley H C (2014). Interlocking brick for sustainable housing development. International Journal of Science, Spirituality, Business and Technology (Ijssbt), 2(2), 58–64.
37. Zahra T (2017). Strategies for Improving the Response of Drystack Masonry to Compression. Queenland University of Technology.
38. Zahra T & Dhanasekar M (2018). Characterisation and strategies for mitigation of the contact surface unevenness in dry-stack masonry. Construction and Building Materials, 169, 612–628.
39. Zheng C, Lou C, Du G, Li X, Liu Z & Li L (2018). Mechanical properties of recycled concrete with demolished waste concrete aggregate and clay brick aggregate. Results in Physics, 9, 1317–1322.