Design Sustainability of Rollover Protective Structure in Tractors

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 402 - 408

Sakthivel M , Elamvazhudi B , Kulothungan S

https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1523230

Abstract

TRollover Protective Structure (ROPS) design is becoming more important in tractors. Static analysis in accordance with the SAE J2194 standard is necessary for the designing ROPS prototypes that maximize safety while minimizing environmental impact. Using renewable and recyclable materials, energy-efficient production techniques, and sound design concepts to increase lifetime and durability are important tactics. In order to promote cradle-to-cradle design principles, the lifecycle assessment approach is utilized to examine environmental implications from material extraction to end-of-life disposal. The study shows how sustainable ROPS can be achieved by maximizing material consumption, putting modular designs into practice, and making sure that regulations are followed. To promote economic and social sustainability, factors like worker safety, local production, and recyclability are also taken into account. This analysis is a framework for designing ROPS that not only ensure operator safety but also contribute to broader sustainability goals, supporting a more sustainable agricultural sector. In this study, static load analysis on ROPS frame with different cross sections and loading conditions was performed using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Three different cross sections were investigated: square, circular, and hollow circular. The produced stress, strain, and deformations under combined loading circumstances can be used to assess ROPS performance. The post-processing results reveal that the material qualities, shape, and loading conditions have a direct impact on the static load behaviour of ROPS. In comparison to other cross sections, the circular cross section has a high load bearing capacity and minimum deformation

Keywords

ROPS, Tractor, Prototype; static analysis, Finite Element Analysis

References

• Improving ROPS designs for agricultural tractors. International Conference on Safety, Health and Welfare in Agriculture and Agro-Food Systems, 111–117.
• Fritz, E. A., Case, J. I., & Switalski, W. G. (1992). Small agricultural tractor ROPS – New operator protective zone. SAE Technical Paper Series, 911782.
• Chennuri, V., Kothagadi, H., & Mohammad, R. (2015). Design and stress analysis of four-post rollover protective structure of agricultural-wheeled tractor. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 4(1).
• Sardar, S. K., Narkar, K., & Panchagade, D. R. (2014). Optimization of rollover protection structure. International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 2(4).
• Kumar, R., Haridass, D., Dhandapani, N., & Dinakar, M. (2018). Non-linear static analysis of off-road vehicle cabin ROPS structure using finite element method. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7, 411–414.
• Hoy, R. M. (2009). Farm tractor rollover protection: Why simply getting rollover protective structures installed on all tractors is not sufficient. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 15(1), 3–4.
• Kim, K. U., & Rehkugler, G. E. (1987). A review of tractor dynamics and stability. Transactions of the ASAE – American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 30(3), 615–623.
• Wang, X., Ayers, P., & Womac, A. R. (2009). Static simulation and analyses of mower ROPS behavior in a finite element model. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 15(4), 335–351.
• Sakthivel, M., & Dhandapani, N. V. (2020). A study of literature review on explicit analysis of rollover protective structure for on-road vehicle by finite element technique. International Journal of Sciences & Research, 9, 387–389.
• Sonawane, S. R., & Kurkute, V. K. (2015). Experimental and analytical investigation of rollover protection structure for agricultural wheeled tractor. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 4(10).
• B. Elamvazhudi, and D. Boodala (2018) Ballistic impact study on fibre reinforced polymer composites using FEA, Mater. Today Proc., pp. 2–9.
• Elamvazhudi, B., & Gopalakannan, S. (2018). Stress intensity factor calculations for semi-elliptical cracked joints using finite element analysis in 3D. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5, 11808–11818.
• Selvakumar, P., Mahajan, A., Murasolimaran, R., & Elango, C. (2015). CAE prediction and test correlation for tractor rollover protective structure (ROPS). SAE Technical Paper Series.
• Anas, S. M., Alam, M., & Umair, M. (2023). Performance of concrete-filled double-skin steel tube with and without core concrete, and concrete-filled steel tubular axially loaded composite columns under close-in blast. International Journal of Protective Structures, 14(3), 299–334.
• De Domenico, D., Losanno, D., & Vaiana, N. (2023). Experimental tests and numerical modeling of full-scale unbonded fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators (UFREIs) under bidirectional excitation. Engineering Structures, 274, 115118.
• Lv, X., Xiao, Z., Fang, J., Li, Q., Lei, F., & Sun, G. (2023). On safety design of vehicle for protection of vulnerable road users: A review. Thin-Walled Structures, 182, 109990.
• Fan, W., Shen, D., Zhang, Z., Huang, X., & Shao, X. (2020). A novel UHPFRC-based protective structure for bridge columns against vehicle collisions: Experiment, simulation, and optimization. Engineering Structures, 207, 110247.
• Wang, J. J., Song, Y. C., Wang, W., & Tu, L. F. (2018). Evaluation of composite crashworthy device for pier protection against barge impact. Ocean Engineering, 169, 144–158.
• Jiga, G., Stamin, Ş., Dinu, G., Dobrescu, T., & Popovici, D. (2015). Comparative studies on the impact behavior of two sandwich structures. Procedia Engineering, 100, 418–427.
• Georgantzia, E., Gkantou, M., & Kamaris, G. S. (2021). Aluminium alloys as structural material: A review of research. Engineering Structures, 227, 111372.
• Kim, D. H., & Kim, S. W. (2019). Numerical investigation of impact-induced damage of auxiliary composite fuel tanks on Korean utility helicopter. Composites Part B: Engineering, 165.
• Kim, M. G., & Kim, S. W. (2021). Impact localization for composite plate using the modified error-outlier algorithm with Pugh’s concept selection under various temperatures. Composite Structures, 272, 114226.
• Gezer, U., Demir, B., Kepir, Y., & Günöz, A. (2023). A numerical study on the low-velocity impact response of hybrid composite materials. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 7(4), 314–321.
• Saleh, S. M., & Al-Abboodi, İ. (2021). Strength and behavior assessment of axially loaded concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 5(4), 154–164.
• Harris, J. R., Winn, G. L., Ayers, P. D., & McKenzie, E. A. (2011). Predicting the performance of cost-effective rollover protective structure designs. Safety Science, 49(8–9), 1252–1261. Cesa, T. R., & Oliveira, B. F. (2013). Finite element simulation of a rollover protective structure. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 4(2), 165–190.
• Kumar, V., Mallesh, G., & Radhakrishna, K. R. (2021). Finite element analysis of a two-post rollover protective structure of an off-highway motor grader. In E. Akinlabi, P. Ramkumar, & M. Selvaraj (Eds.), Trends in Mechanical and Biomedical Design. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer.
• Karaca, E. O. ., Tanyıldızı, M. ., & Bozkurt, N. . (2022). Investigation of seismic base isolation systems and their properties. Engineering Applications, 1(1), 63–71.
• Eser, M. M., & Can, H. (2022). Investigation of the effects of using steel cross and reinforced concrete shears earthquake performance in building. Engineering Applications, 1(2), 157–162.
• Al-Hagri, M. G., Nakipoglu, A., & Döndüren, M. S. (2023). Effect of arrangement of masonry infill walls, shear walls and steel bracings on the story drift and stiffness irregularity. Advanced Engineering Science, 3, 85–97.