Research Article

Examination of the curriculum and instructional PhD dissertations in the field of educational sciences concerning theoretical framework, method and contributions of research dimensions

Volume: 9 Number: 4 October 31, 2020
EN TR

Examination of the curriculum and instructional PhD dissertations in the field of educational sciences concerning theoretical framework, method and contributions of research dimensions

Abstract

This study focused on the doctoral program in Curriculum and Instruction (CIPP) due to its crucial role in training qualified human capital and in creating solutions for economic and social problems. It investigated to what extent CIPP contributes to training innovative and creative Turkish PhD holders evaluating their dissertations through a rubric. Two expert raters in educational sciences evaluated seventy dissertations completed by the Turkish PhD holders in Turkey and abroad between 2013 and 2019 according to the cutoff scores in the rubric. Twenty-nine dissertations were rated at Below Level 1, forty-one dissertations at Level 1 and no dissertations at Level 2. No significant difference was observed among the dissertations despite significant differences in theoretical framework, method and contributions of research dimensions. The dissertations completed in Turkey and abroad do not contribute an innovative perspective to education. It is understood that the programs are not effective to train innovative and creative the PhD holders. Several implications were discussed to improve the doctoral programs.

Keywords

References

  1. * (References with an asterisk (*) indicate the PhD dissertations examined in the study.)
  2. Bayrak Karsli, M., Karabey, S., Cagiltay, N. E., & Göktaş, Y. (2018). Comparison of the discussion sections of PhD disserations in educational technology: the case of Turkey and the USA. Scientometrics, 117, 1381-1403. DOI:10.1007/s11192-018-2955-8
  3. Bıkmaz, F. H., Aksoy, E., Tatar, Ö., & Altınyüzük, C. A. (2013). Eğitim programları ve öğretim alanında yapılan doktora tezlerine ait içerik çözümlemesi (1974-2009) [The content analysis of PhD theses completed in the field of curriculum and instruction]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(168), 280-303.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretations]. Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
  5. Can, A. (2019). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process through SPSS]. (7. Edition). Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
  6. Crocker, A., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Ohio: Cengage Learning.
  7. Çapuk, S. (2014). Comparative analysis of curriculum and instruction master and doctorate programs between Turkey and the U.S. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). İnönü University, Malatya.
  8. Çeri, B. K. (2013). The evaluation of curriculum and instruction graduate programme according to faculty members’ opinions. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yildiz Technical University, İstanbul.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 31, 2020

Submission Date

May 14, 2020

Acceptance Date

October 22, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 9 Number: 4

APA
Aslan, A., Açıkgöz, Ö., Günay, A., & Koçak, K. (2020). Examination of the curriculum and instructional PhD dissertations in the field of educational sciences concerning theoretical framework, method and contributions of research dimensions. Turkish Journal of Education, 9(4), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.737423

Cited By

Turkish Journal of Education is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0